Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/907,011

Hybrid Wired Communication System Combining Controller Area Network (CAN) and Other High Speed Communication Technologies

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 04, 2024
Priority
Oct 06, 2023 — TW 112138625 +1 more
Examiner
RENNER, BRANDON M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hk Oceancomm Technology Co. Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
774 granted / 952 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1006
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 952 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 10/4/2024 fails to comply with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97, 1.98 and MPEP § 609 because the USPUB number for the Mutter reference is incorrect. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered as to the merits. Applicant is advised that the date of any re-submission of any item of information contained in this information disclosure statement or the submission of any missing element(s) will be the date of submission for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements based on the time of filing the statement, including all certification requirements for statements under 37 CFR 1.97(e). See MPEP § 609.05(a). Appropriate correction required. Claim Objections Claims 1-12 are objected to because of the following informalities: The claims do not spell out the first recitation of various acronyms such as CAN, CAN FD, MCU, CRC, ID. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kishigami et al. “Kishigami” US 2018/0205572. Regarding claim 1, Kishigami teaches a wired communication system having a communication medium consisting of two wires, and comprising at least two high-speed communication units compatible with a CAN protocol (Figures 1 and 4 show multiple high speed communication units (14) which can operate on CAN/CAN-FD; Paragraph 12), wherein each of the high-speed communication units comprises: a first CAN transceiver for modulating and transmitting, or receiving and demodulating CAN protocol signals (low speed transceiver (12) of Figure 1 constructs CAN or CAN-FD; Paragraph 43); wherein the first CAN transceiver does not transmit dominant signals in order not to interfere with high-speed signals when the wired communication system is transmitting the high-speed signals (when high speed transmissions are being performed, the low-speed transceiver is in a sleep mode so as not to affect the high-speed communications; Paragraph 56. Sleep mode suspends the transmission/reception of data; Paragraph 53. Thus, one can see the low-power transceiver does not transmit a dominant signal); the first CAN transceiver can transmit signals only after a predetermined time period has elapsed since dominant signaling ceased (after the low power transceiver goes to sleep mode (S2 od Figure 4), the low-power transceiver will receive a wakeup command and return to normal mode to send data (S4); Paragraph 71. The time between going to sleep (i.e. dominant signaling ceased) to wakeup up and transmitting in normal mode is viewed as the predetermined time period); the wired communication system has a default mechanism that allows all the high-speed communication units connected to the same communication medium to know start and end times of transmissions of the high-speed signals for reception and demodulation (Paragraphs 68-69 teaches the high-speed transceivers (which are connected to the same communication medium (See Figure 1)) start transmitting at time S2 and cease transmission at time S3); and all of the high-speed communication units return to an original CAN mode for the start of frame and arbitration of the next transmission (At S4, all the transceivers return to the normal mode; Paragraph 71. As discussed above, this includes CAN/CAN-FD). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDON M RENNER whose telephone number is (571)270-3621. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached at (571)-272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDON M RENNER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707464
COMMUNICATION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696183
UE RACH RESOURCE CONFIGURATION SELECTION FUNCTION AND RESOURCE PRIORITIZATION TO SUPPORT SLICING
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696297
RADIO (NR) MULTICAST FEEDBACK SWITCHING
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689928
INTER-CELL BEAM MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689477
UPLINK (UL) SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL (SRS) RESOURCE CONFIGURATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
3y 1m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 952 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month