Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/907,133

CONVEYANCE APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 04, 2024
Priority
Oct 19, 2023 — JP 2023-180331
Examiner
CAMPBELL, KEITH
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ishida Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
538 granted / 599 resolved
+37.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 6m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
606
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
47.2%
+7.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
§112
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 599 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Multipond (DE 202007004721). Regarding claim 1, Multipond discloses a conveyance apparatus comprising: a conveyance unit (paragraph 0032 of the translation; fig 1) configured to convey an article (meat; paragraphs 0017, 0029 of the translation) that is charged from an outside and contains fat on at least a surface of the article, wherein a hydrophilic coating layer (36, paragraph 0029 of the translation) is formed on a conveyance front surface of the conveyance unit. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishikawa (US Pub 2022/0146301) in view of Multipond. Regarding claim 1, Kishikawa discloses a conveyance apparatus comprising: a conveyance unit (the louver processing is carried out on an any surface (flow path surface) on which an article slides down by its own weight, such as the inner side I of the dispersion feeder 2, the radiation feeders 3, the pool hoppers 4 (gates 4a), the weighing hoppers 5 (gates 5a and 5b), the booster hoppers 6 (gates 6a), the sorting chutes 7, or the like; paragraph 0052) configured to convey an article that is charged from an outside and contains fat on at least a surface of the article (capable of conveying an article with fat on the surface). Regarding claim 2, Kishikawa also discloses the conveyance front surface includes a plurality of protrusions (92). Regarding claim 3, Kishikawa also discloses an opening (91A) directed from the conveyance front surface to a back surface is formed at a downstream end of each of the plurality of protrusions (fig 4). Regarding claim 4, Kishikawa also discloses the plurality of protrusions is formed by shutter processing (louver processing; paragraphs 0051-0052; applicant equates shutter processing and louver processing in the instant specification paragraph 0023). Regarding claim 7, Kishikawa also discloses the conveyance unit includes a chute (9), and when the chute is viewed from a side, an angle formed by the chute and a horizontal direction is in a range of 40 to 60 degrees (fig 1). Kishikawa does not disclose (claim 1) a hydrophilic coating layer is formed on a conveyance front surface of the conveyance unit. Regarding claim 1, Multipond teaches a hydrophilic coating layer is formed on a conveyance front surface of a conveyance unit (36, paragraph 0029 of the translation). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the front surface of the conveyance apparatus of Kishikawa to include a hydrophilic coating layer as taught by Multipond in order to better transport meat by minimizing adhesion and friction forces (paragraph 0016-0017 of the translation). Claims 1, 2 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nagai ’033 (US Patent 11,261,033) in view of Multipond. Regarding claim 1, Nagai ’033 discloses a conveyance apparatus comprising: a conveyance unit (col 5, lines 59-64) configured to convey an article that is charged from an outside and contains fat on at least a surface of the article (col 1, lines 61-63). Regarding claim 2, Nagai ’033 also discloses the conveyance front surface includes a plurality of protrusions (col 5, lines 59-64). Regarding claim 5, Nagai ’033 also discloses a plurality of protrusions is formed by embossing (col 5, lines 59-64). Nagai ’033 does not disclose (claim 1) a hydrophilic coating layer is formed on a conveyance front surface of the conveyance unit. Regarding claim 1, Multipond teaches a hydrophilic coating layer is formed on a conveyance front surface of a conveyance unit (36, paragraph 0029 of the translation). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the front surface of the conveyance apparatus of Nagai ’033 to include a hydrophilic coating layer as taught by Multipond in order to better transport meat by minimizing adhesion and friction forces (paragraph 0016-0017 of the translation). Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishikawa in view of Multipond as applied to claim 2 and further in view of Nagai ‘127 (WO 2018/139127). Regarding claim 6, Kishikawa also discloses a trough (3; stated to be inclined in paragraph 0052). Kishikawa in view of Multipond disclose all of the limitations of claim 2, but do not explicitly disclose (claim 6) when the trough is viewed from a side, an angle formed by the trough and a horizontal direction is in a range of 9 to 12 degrees. Regarding claim 6, Nagai ‘127 teaches the conveyance unit includes a trough, and when the trough is viewed from a side, an angle formed by the trough and a horizontal direction is in a range of 9 to 12 degrees (paragraph 0058 of the translation). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the trough of the conveyance apparatus of Kishikawa to have an angle formed by the trough and a horizontal direction is in a range of 9 to 12 degrees in order to balance transport speed and ability to stop conveyed meat (paragraph 0058 of the translation). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 8 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Keith R Campbell whose telephone number is (571)270-1015. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am-5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at (571) 272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KRC/Examiner, Art Unit 3651 6/22/2026 /GENE O CRAWFORD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678673
VERTICAL DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR GOLF BALLS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673833
DEVICE FOR ORDERLY TRANSFER OF PRODUCTS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668435
SORTING CONVEYOR SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12600578
SUPPLY APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589947
CONTAINER TRANSPORT APPARATUS AND LOGISTICS TRANSPORT SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+0.8%)
1y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 599 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month