Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/907,823

SOLAR PANEL RECYCLING MECHANISM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 07, 2024
Priority
Jul 29, 2024 — TW 113128109
Examiner
ALAWADI, MOHAMMED S
Art Unit
3725
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Reverse Energy Solutions Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 718 resolved
+4.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
77 currently pending
Career history
773
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 718 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 3 objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 3, the phrase “exterior of said material picking unit” should be changed to “an exterior of said material picking unit” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the surface" in line 10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the surface" in line 10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the other side" in lines 11-12. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Regarding claim 1, in liens 11-12 the phrase “the other side" render the claim indefinite because it is unclear why having “the other side” without “a side”. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the power" in line 18. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 4-5 are rejected because they depend from claim 1. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the interior" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the closet prior art is FU (US20240304745A1), however in the opinion of the Examiner that the arts of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitations of the claim as recited. Claims 2-5 are depended from claim 1. Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED S ALAWADI whose telephone number is (571)272-2224. The examiner can normally be reached 08:00 am- 05:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHRISTOPHER TEMPLETON can be reached at (571)270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMED S. ALAWADI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678846
PLATE CROWN CONTROL DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673306
PULPING MACHINE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673327
FRETTING WEAR REDUCTION IN INTERFERENCE FIT OF CONE CRUSHER HEAD
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668539
ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR MIXING A PASTE AT A WASTE DISPOSAL SITE
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667226
BEAN GRINDING COFFEE MACHINE AND BEAN GRINDING COFFEE MACHINE CONTROL METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+23.8%)
2y 7m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 718 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month