Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/908,060

ACOUSTIC PROCESSING METHOD, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND ACOUSTIC PROCESSING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 07, 2024
Priority
Apr 14, 2022 — provisional 63/330,925 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, SEAN H
Art Unit
2691
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
525 granted / 608 resolved
+24.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
623
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
79.3%
+39.3% vs TC avg
§102
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 608 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
CTNF 18/908,060 CTNF 89950 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 07-06 AIA 15-10-15 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 07-20-aia AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 07-21-aia AIA Claim (s) 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jeon et al. (US 2020/0037091) herein Jeon in view of Fielder et al. (EP 3257268) herein Fielder . Regarding claim 1, Jeon discloses an acoustic processing method (acoustic processing method in Jeon: [0007]) comprising: obtaining (i) sound information related to a sound including a predetermined sound and (ii) metadata including information related to a space in which the predetermined sound is reproduced (Jeon: fig. 2, [0058], [0145]) ; performing, based on the sound information and the metadata, acoustic processing of generating a sound signal expressing a sound including an early reflection that reaches a user after a direct sound that reaches the user directly from a sound source object (Jeon: [0055], [0061], [0062]) ; and outputting an output sound signal including the sound signal (Jeon: [0046]) , wherein the acoustic processing includes: determining parameters for generating the early reflection, the parameters including a position, in the space, of a virtual sound source object that generates the early reflection (‘virtual reflect sound source”, Jeon: fig. 8, [0062], [0112]) ; and generating the early reflection based on the parameters determined (Jeon: [0112]) , but lacks wherein the parameters include at least a parameter that varies over time according to a predetermined condition. Nevertheless, it is well known in the art to adjust parameters that varies over time according to a predetermined condition as demonstrated by Fielder (virtual reflect sound source processed to have specific directional patterns based on a wobbling function with a stochastic amplitude, Fielder: figs. 2, 4, [0023]-[0025], [0034]) . Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the parameters of Jeon to include at least a parameter that varies over time according to a predetermined conditioned as demonstrated by Fielder in order to adjust for fluctuations of direction and amplitude of the virtual reflect sound source from the user’s point of view to improve the sense of externalization. Regarding claim 2 , in the combination of Jeon and Fielding, Fielding discloses wherein the parameter that varies over time is the position, in the space, of the virtual sound source object that generates the early reflection (parameter varies over time in position and space of the virtual sound source object with a stochastic directional pattern, Fielding: [0023]-[0025], [0034]) . Regarding claim 3 , in the combination of Jeon and Fielding, Fielding discloses wherein the predetermined condition is a random number for determining the position of the virtual sound source object (stochastic directional pattern involves a random number for determining the position of virtual sound source objects, Fielding: [0023]-[0025], [0034]) . Regarding claim 4 , in the combination of Jeon and Fielding, Fielding discloses wherein the predetermined condition is a trajectory in the space for determining the position of the virtual sound source object (trajectory in the space is used for determining position of the virtual sound source object, Fielding: [0023]-[0025], [0034]) . Regarding claim 5, in the combination of Jeon and Fielding, Jeon discloses wherein a range over which the position of the virtual sound source object can vary is determined according to a positional relationship between the user and the virtual sound source object (Jeon: [0061], [0062]) . Regarding claim 6, in the combination of Jeon and Fielding, Jeon discloses wherein a range over which the position of the virtual sound source object can vary is determined according to an acoustic characteristic of the space (Jeon: [0061], [0062]) . Regarding claim 7, in the combination of Jeon and Fielding, Jeon discloses non-transitory computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for causing a computer to execute the acoustic processing method according to claim 1 (Jeon: [0023]) . Regarding claim 8, Jeon discloses an acoustic processing system (acoustic processing system in Jeon: [0007]) comprising: an obtainer that obtains (i) sound information related to a sound including a predetermined sound and (ii) metadata including information related to a space in which the predetermined sound is reproduced (Jeon: fig. 2, [0058]) ; an acoustic processor that performs, based on the sound information and the metadata, acoustic processing of generating a sound signal expressing a sound including an early reflection that reaches a user after a direct sound that reaches the user directly from a sound source object (Jeon: [0055], [0061], [0062]) ; and an outputter that outputs an output sound signal including the sound signal (Jeon: [0046]) , wherein the acoustic processor includes: a parameter determiner that determines parameters for generating the early reflection, the parameters including a position, in the space, of a virtual sound source object that generates the early reflection (‘virtual reflect sound source”, Jeon: fig. 8, [0062], [0112]) ; and an early reflection generation processor that generates the early reflection based on the parameters determined (Jeon: [0112]) , but lacks the parameters include at least a parameter that varies over time according to a predetermined condition. Nevertheless, it is well known in the art to adjust parameters that varies over time according to a predetermined condition as demonstrated by Fielder (virtual reflect sound source processed to have specific directional patterns based on a wobbling function with a stochastic amplitude, Fielder: figs. 2, 4, [0023]-[0025], [0034]) . Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the parameters of Jeon to include at least a parameter that varies over time according to a predetermined conditioned as demonstrated by Fielder in order to adjust for fluctuations of direction and amplitude of the virtual reflect sound source from the user’s point of view to improve the sense of externalization. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN H NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5728. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached at (571)272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN H NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2691 Application/Control Number: 18/908,060 Page 2 Art Unit: 2691 Application/Control Number: 18/908,060 Page 3 Art Unit: 2691 Application/Control Number: 18/908,060 Page 4 Art Unit: 2691 Application/Control Number: 18/908,060 Page 5 Art Unit: 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671945
PIEZOELECTRIC DEVICE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND APPARATUS INCLUDING THE PIEZOELECTRIC DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666202
LOUDSPEAKER AND TERMINAL DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666199
SPEAKER DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652497
BONE CONDUCTION SPEAKERS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647706
Speaker with Single Driver Force Cancellation
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+4.8%)
2y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 608 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month