Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/908,283

ANTENNA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING SAME

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 07, 2024
Examiner
DUONG, DIEU HIEN
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Innotek Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
803 granted / 1028 resolved
+10.1% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1051
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1028 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 12-13 are objected to because of the following informalities: “Meander line shape” should be changed to “meander line shape”. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 9, 12-13 and 17 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 15 and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 12,142,855. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims 15 and 17 of the above Patent recite all the limitations of claims 1 and 17 as below: Examined Claims U.S. Patent No. 12,142,855 1.An antenna module comprising: -a first radiation part and a second radiation part configured to receive a current via at least one feeder line; -a first coupling radiation part coupled to the first radiation part while being spaced a predetermined distance apart from the first radiation part; and -a second coupling radiation part coupled to the second radiation part and spaced apart from the second radiation part in a predetermined interval, -wherein the first coupling radiation part is formed as a line patch having a predetermined width (see claim 17 for predetermined width), and -wherein the second coupling radiation part comprises: a square patch in a quadrangular shape; a first line patch extended from one end of the square patch (first line patch is second line patch in claim 17); and -a second line patch extended from another end of the square patch (third line patch in claim 17). 9. The antenna module according to claim 1, wherein the first radiation part and the second radiation part are formed on a substrate, and wherein the first coupling radiation part and the second coupling radiation part are formed on at least one outer side surface of a bracket covering the substrate. 12. The antenna module according to claim 1, wherein the line patch of the first coupling radiation part is formed in a Meander line shape. 13. The antenna module according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the first line patch and the second line patch is formed in a Meander line shape. 17. An electronic device comprising: -a substrate; -a first radiation part and a second radiation part connected to the substrate via at least one feeder line and configured to receive a current; -a bracket covering the substrate; -a first coupling radiation part spaced apart from the first radiation part in a predetermined interval, formed on at least one outer side surface of the bracket, and coupled to the first radiation part; and -a second coupling radiation part spaced apart from the second radiation part in a predetermined interval, formed on at least one outer side surface of the bracket, and coupled to the second radiation part, -wherein the first coupling radiation part is formed as a line patch having a predetermined width, and wherein the second coupling radiation part comprises: a square patch in a quadrangular shape; a first line patch extended from one end of the square patch; and a second line patch extended from another end of the square patch. 15. An electronic device comprising: a substrate; -a first radiation part and a second radiation part connected to the substrate via at least one feeder line and configured to receive a current; a bracket covering the substrate; -a first coupling radiation part spaced apart from the first radiation part in a predetermined interval, formed on at least one outer side surface of the bracket, and coupled to the first radiation part; and -a second coupling radiation part spaced apart from the second radiation part in a predetermined interval, formed on at least one outer side surface of the bracket, and coupled to the second radiation part, -wherein the first coupling radiation part is formed as a first line patch having a first meander line shape, and -wherein the second coupling radiation part comprises a quadrangular-shaped patch and a second line patch having a second meander shape. 17. The electronic device according to claim 15, wherein the first line patch has a predetermined width, and wherein the second coupling radiation part comprises: the second line patch extended from one end of the quadrangular-shaped patch; and a third line patch extended from another end of the quadrangular-shaped patch. 15. An electronic device comprising: -a substrate; -a first radiation part and a second radiation part connected to the substrate via at least one feeder line and configured to receive a current; -a bracket covering the substrate; -a first coupling radiation part spaced apart from the first radiation part in a predetermined interval, formed on at least one outer side surface of the bracket, and coupled to the first radiation part; and -a second coupling radiation part spaced apart from the second radiation part in a predetermined interval, formed on at least one outer side surface of the bracket, and coupled to the second radiation part, -wherein the first coupling radiation part is formed as a first line patch having a first meander line shape, and wherein the second coupling radiation part comprises a quadrangular-shaped patch and a second line patch having a second meander shape. 17. The electronic device according to claim 15, wherein the first line patch has a predetermined width, and wherein the second coupling radiation part comprises: the second line patch extended from one end of the quadrangular-shaped patch; and a third line patch extended from another end of the quadrangular-shaped patch. Claims 2, 4-5, 7, 10-11, 14-15, 18 and 20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 15 and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 12,142,855 in view of Shibata et al (US 2019/0157762). Regarding claims 2, 7, 14-15 and 18, the U.S. Patent No. 12,142,855 discloses every feature of claimed invention as expressly recited in claim 17 except for the first radiation part and the second radiation part radiating signals in different frequency bands; one of the first radiation part and the second radiation part is a radiation part for Wi-Fi, and the other one is a radiation part for Bluetooth. the first radiation part configured to cause resonance with the first coupling radiation part in at least one of a 2.4 to 2.5 GHz band or a 5.0 to 5.2 GHz band; the second radiation part configured to cause resonance with the second coupling radiation part in a band of 2.4 to 2.5 GHz. However, such difference is not patentable merit. It is a common practice and well known in the art that radiating elements with different sizes are used for different frequency bands. One of such examples is the teaching of Shibata in Figure 1 and par. 0043, the first radiation part (31) and the second radiation part (32) radiating signals in different frequency bands. Therefore, to employ having the radiation parts as claimed invention would have been obvious to persons kill in the art. Regarding claims 4-5, 10-11 and 20, the U.S. Patent No. 12,142,855 discloses every feature of claimed invention as expressly recited in claims 1 and 17, except for wherein a length of a radiation patch of the first radiation part is 17.5 to 17.7 mm; wherein the square patch is formed to have a length of 21.6 to 21.8 mm and a width of 4.9 to 5.1 mm, wherein a length of the first line patch is 24.25 to 24.45 mm, and wherein a length of the second line patch is 18.75 to 18.95 mm; wherein a length of a radiation patch of the second radiation part is 17.2 to 17.4 mm; wherein a length of the line patch of the first coupling radiation part is 31.3 to 31.5 mm. However, such difference is not patentable merit. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to set or select the lengths and width of the radiation patches, square patch, line patches of the radiation parts and coupling radiation parts at a desired values for desired operating frequencies assigned to the antenna module and since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only ordinary skill in the art. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 6, 8, 16 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIEU HIEN T DUONG whose telephone number is (571)272-8980. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DIMARY CRUZ LOPEZ can be reached at 571-270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIEU HIEN T DUONG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603433
ANTENNA ELEMENT AND ANTENNA ARRAY COMPRISING SUCH ANTENNA ELEMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586907
REACTANCE-LOADED SEQUENTIAL-PHASE FEED NETWORK FOR A HIGHLY COMPACT WIDEBAND ON-CHIP CIRCULARLY POLARIZED ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586909
MICROSTRIP ANTENNA AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586925
ANTENNAS WITH PERIODIC STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580305
LOW PROFILE DEVICE COMPRISING LAYERS OF COUPLED RESONANCE STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+17.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1028 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month