Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/908,499

PROVIDING HEALTH URGENCY CONTEXT FOR INCOMING CALLS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 07, 2024
Priority
Oct 12, 2021 — continuation of 12/120,266
Examiner
GHULAMALI, QUTBUDDIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Optum Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
930 granted / 1092 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1109
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1092 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims The following is a non-final, first action on the merits, in response to continuation application filed October 07, 2024. Claims 1-20, are currently pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/21/2024, is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The non-statutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper time wise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A non-statutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1-20, are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1-18, of the issued U.S. Patent No. 12,120,266. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because, for instance, the limitations of claim 1, - A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving, by one or more processors of a first computing device, from one or more sensors, sensor data indicative of health information associated with a user of the first computing device; in response to determining to send a request to a second computing device to establish a communication, session, determining, by the one or more processors and based at least in part on the health information associated with the user, contextual information indicative of an urgency level of the communication session; and sending, by the one or more processors to the second computing device, the request to establish the communication session and an indication of the contextual information associated with the communication session. - recited in the instant application is broader and similar enough to be encompassed by the limitations presented in claim 1, of the issued patent No. 12,120,266. Similarly, the limitations of claim 11, - A system comprising: one or more sensors (output devices) configured to sense health information associated with a user of the system; one or more processors; and one or more memories storing processor-executable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving sensor data from the one or more sensors; in response to determining to send a request to a remote computing device to establish a communication session, determining, based at least in part on the health information associated with the user, contextual information indicative of an urgency level of the communication session; and sending, to the remote computing device, the request to establish the communication session and an indication of the contextual information associated with the communication session. - recited in the instant application is broader and similar enough to be encompassed by the limitations presented in claim 11, of the issued patent No. 12,120,266. Similarly, the limitations of claim 20, - One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing processor-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a computing device, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving, from one or more sensors, sensor data indicative of health information associated with a user of the computing device; in response to determining to send a request to a remote computing device to establish a communication session, determining, based at least in part on the health information associated with the user, contextual information indicative of an urgency level of the communication session; and sending, to the remote computing device, the request to establish the communication session and an indication of the contextual information associated with the communication session. - recited in the instant application is broader and similar enough to be encompassed by the limitations presented in claim 18, of the issued patent No. 12,120,266. Similarly, the limitations of claims 2-10, 12-19, recited in the instant case are broadly recited to be encompassed by the claim 2-10, 12-17, of the issued patent No. 12,071,065. The claim 1, analyzed above, show limitations of the claim 1, in the instant application are broader having similar limitation to be encompassed by the limitations of claim 1, of the US Patent No. 12,071,065, as anticipation to all limitations considered is equivalent to obviousness and as such would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to implement the claims similarly recited in the instant application using the claims of US Patent 12,071,065, in order to implement vehicle image projection claimed in the instant application. Claims 2-10, show equivalency to claims 2-10, respectively, of the US Patent 12,071,065. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUTBUDDIN GHULAMALI whose telephone number is (571) 272-3014. The examiner can normally be reached on 7:30am to 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chieh Fan can be reached on 571 272 3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUTBUDDIN GHULAMALI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2632.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707379
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HANDLING REGISTERED PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK DURING DISASTER SITUATION IN WIRELESS NETWORK
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707378
TERMINAL, BASE STATION AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701192
SERVER APPARATUS, ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701534
METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE FOR LOCATION ACQUISITION, MEDIUM, CHIP, PRODUCT, AND PROGRAM
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701414
USER EQUIPMENT-TO-NETWORK RELAY SECURITY FOR PROXIMITY BASED SERVICES
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.1%)
2y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1092 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month