Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/908,664

RELEASABLE HOLDER FOR CABLES AND CONDUIT

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Oct 07, 2024
Priority
Aug 24, 2015 — provisional 62/209,213 +5 more
Examiner
WOOD, KIMBERLY T
Art Unit
3631
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sticnstac, LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
627 granted / 1145 resolved
+2.8% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1176
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1145 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
This is a Final office action for serial number 18908664. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-15 of prior U.S. Patent No.12113344. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. 12113344 and this application 19908664 disclose the same invention using the claims as disclosed below: 1. A releasable cable holder for securing a cable in a suspended ceiling environment to a structural wire in the suspended ceiling environment, the releasable cable holder comprising: a first cable-holding portion, a second structure-connecting portion, and a third portion coupling the first cable-holding portion and the second structure-connection portion, the first cable-holding portion including: a first planar base plate, formed with sidewalls extending upward from the first planar base plate; a first living hinge formed along one of the sidewalls, movably connecting a first planar top cover to the one of the sidewalls; a first latching lip formed on the first planar top cover, distal from the first living hinge; a corresponding lip formed on another of the sidewalls, distal from the first living hinge, the first latching lip and corresponding lip together defining a first pair of latching lips; a first base ridge jutting out from the first planar base plate and generally facing the top cover; a first impediment jutting out from the first planar top cover and generally facing the first planar base plate; and a release tab on the top cover adjacent the first latching lip; wherein the first base ridge, the first impediment, and the first latching lip are operable to secure the cable on the first planar base plate between the sidewalls by moving the first planar top cover about the first living hinge so that the first latching lip clasps the corresponding lip to latch the first planar top cover closed relative to the first planar base plate, and the cable is secured between the first base ridge and the impediment when the first planar top cover is closed relative to the first planar base plate; and the second structure-connecting portion including: a second base plate with a second ridge, and a second top cover with a second impediment, the second base plate and the second top cover connected by a second living hinge; a second pair of latching lips opposite the second hinge, wherein the second structure-connecting portion is operable to grip the structural wire between the second ridge and the second impediment. 2. The releasable cable holder of claim 1 wherein the first cable-holding portion further includes a hole formed in the first planar base plate. 3. The releasable cable holder of claim 2 wherein the third portion is a coupler on the second structure-connecting portion for connecting to the hole in the first planar base plate of the first cable-holding portion. 4. The releasable cable holder of claim 1 wherein the third portion is a coupler on a selected one of the second base plate and the second top cover of the second structure-connecting portion. 5. The releasable cable holder of claim 4 wherein the third portion is a coupler on the second base plate of the second structure-connecting portion. 6. The releasable cable holder of claim 4 wherein the third portion is a coupler on the second top cover of the second structure-connecting portion. 7. The releasable cable holder of claim 1 further including a span offsetting the third portion from the second structure-connecting portion. 8. The releasable cable holder of claim 7 wherein the span defines a proximal end adjacent the second structure-connecting portion and a distal end opposite the proximal end, and wherein the third portion includes a coupler at the distal end of the span. 9. The releasable holder of claim 1 wherein the third portion is integrally formed with the second structure-connecting portion. 10. The releasable holder of claim 9 wherein the third portion is on the second base plate of the second structure-connecting portion. 11. The releasable holder of claim 9 wherein the third portion is on the second top cover of the second structure-connecting portion. 12. The releasable holder of claim 9 wherein the third portion is on the second top cover of the second structure-connecting portion. 13. The releasable holder of claim 1 further including a span extending from the second structure-connecting portion to a distal end of the span. 14. The releasable cable holder of claim 13 wherein the third portion includes a coupler at the distal end of the span. 15. The releasable cable holder of claim 14 wherein the coupler and the span are formed integrally with the second structure-connecting portion. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed June 30, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive since The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLY T WOOD whose telephone number is (571)272-6826. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thur 9:00am-5:30pm flexible schedule. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached at (571) 272-8227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIMBERLY T WOOD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Jun 30, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747571
SUCTION CUP ARTICLE FOR A URINAL SCREEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12729744
ISOLATION BUSHINGS WITH CONFORMING MULTI-PART COVERS
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727699
Mounting Bracket
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722538
LOOP LATCH RELEASE SYSTEM FOR A LONG RAIL ASSEMBLY
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12696991
Mounting Bracket
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+27.6%)
2y 9m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1145 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month