Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/909,169

MULTIFUNCTIONAL BLANKET

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Oct 08, 2024
Examiner
EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT
Art Unit
3673
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Shenzhen Qingshan Orange Network Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
697 granted / 878 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
905
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 878 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: In paragraphs [0027] and [0053], “hoop and loop” should read –hook and loop--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claims 2 and 7 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 2, line 3, “hoop and loop” should read –hook and loop—and in claim 7, line 2, “proactive” should read --protective. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3, 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 discloses “a first protective pad” in line 2. Because “a first protective pad” is already disclosed in claim 1, from which claim 4 depends, it is not clear if the “first protective pad” disclosed in claim 4 is the same one from claim 1 or if claim 4 is introducing a new and different “first protective pad”, rendering claim 4 indefinite. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the first protective pads" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. With regard to claim 10, in that claim 10 depends from claim 9, claim 10 is similarly rejected. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the second protective pads" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over USP 4,484,362 (Asher hereinafter) in view of USPAP 2013/0239290 (Rossi hereinafter). With regard to claim 1, Asher discloses a multifunctional blanket, comprising a body (1) that is rectangular in shape; a first side edge (right side, Fig. 1); and a second side edge (left side, Fig. 1); wherein the first side edge (right side, Fig. 1) of the body (1) is provided with: a continuous flexible connecting structure (4); and wherein the second side edge (left side, Fig. 1) of the body (1) is provided with: a mating structure (4) which is used for mating with the continuous flexible connecting structure (4). Asher does not disclose wherein the first side edge is provided with a first connecting structure and a second connecting structure arranged at intervals, the first connecting structure and the second connecting structure being connected and then enclosing with the first side edge of the body to form a ring-shaped neck-hanging structure, and a first protective pad, and at least part of the first protective pad being located within the ring-shaped neck-hanging structure and covering the area where the continuous flexible connecting structure forms the ring-shaped neck-hanging structure after the first connecting structure is connected with the second connecting structure. Rossi teaches a body (22) that is rectangular in shape with a first side edge (28) wherein the first side edge (28) is provided with a first connecting structure (60, 70) and a second connecting structure (opposing strap, 60) arranged at intervals, the first connecting structure and the second connecting structure being connected (Fig.’s 11 and 12) and then enclosing with the first side edge (28) of the body (22) to form a ring-shaped neck-hanging structure, and a first protective pad, and at least part of the first protective pad being located within the ring-shaped neck-hanging structure (Fig. 11) and covering the area where the continuous flexible connecting structure forms the ring-shaped neck-hanging structure after the first connecting structure is connected with the second connecting structure. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the application was filed to modify the apparatus of Asher by providing wherein the first side edge is provided with a first connecting structure and a second connecting structure arranged at intervals, the first connecting structure and the second connecting structure being connected and then enclosing with the first side edge of the body to form a ring-shaped neck-hanging structure, and a first protective pad, and at least part of the first protective pad being located within the ring-shaped neck-hanging structure and covering the area where the continuous flexible connecting structure forms the ring-shaped neck-hanging structure after the first connecting structure is connected with the second connecting structure as taught in Rossi for the purposes of being able to wear the garment in a releasably secured manner, making it easy to remove, thereby safely securing the garment to the user (paragraph [0002] of Rossi). With regard to claim 2, the Asher modification with regard to claim 1 discloses the multifunctional blanket of claim 1, wherein the first connecting structure comprises a locking member (70), and the locking member (70) comprises a button, a hidden button, a plug-in buckle, a knot button, a tri-glide buckle, or a hoop and loop fastener. With regard to claim 3, the Asher modification with regard to claim 1 discloses the multifunctional blanket of claim 2, wherein the first connecting structure further comprises a connecting strap (60), and the connecting strap (60) connects the locking member (70) and the body (1). With regard to claim 4, insofar as claim 4 is definite, the Asher modification with regard to claim 1 discloses the multifunctional blanket of claim 1, wherein a side of a first protective pad (3) away from the body (1) is provided in a protrudent manner with respect to a side of the continuous flexible connecting structure (4) away from the body (1). With regard to claim 5, the Asher modification with regard to claim 1 discloses the multifunctional blanket of claim 1, wherein the first protective pad (3) is a deformable flexible structure. With regard to claim 6, the Asher modification with regard to claim 1 discloses the multifunctional blanket of claim 1, wherein an overall length of the first protective pad (3) is the same as or similar to a length of the first side edge (right side, Fig. 1) of the body (1). With regard to claim 7, the Asher modification with regard to claim 1 discloses the multifunctional blanket of claim 1, wherein the second side edge (left side, Fig. 1) of the body (1) is provided with a second proactive pad (2) which is used for covering the mating structure (4), and the second side edge (left side, Fig. 1) and the first side edge (right side, Fig. 1) are a set of opposite edges of the body (1). With regard to claim 8, the Asher modification with regard to claim 1 discloses the multifunctional blanket of claim 1, wherein corner parts of the body (1) are provided with limiting straps (16). With regard to claim 9, insofar as claim 9 is definite, the Asher modification with regard to claim 1 discloses the multifunctional blanket of claim 1, but does not disclose wherein two sides of the continuous flexible connecting structure (4) are respectively provided with the first protective pads (3). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to provide an additional first protective pad on the other side of the continuous flexible connecting structure, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378. With regard to claim 10, insofar as claim 10 is definite, the Asher modification with regard to claim 9 discloses the multifunctional blanket of claim 9, cut does not disclose wherein two sides of the mating structure (4) are respectively provided with the second protective pads (2). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to provide an additional second protective pad on the other side of the mating structure, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. USP’s 6,708,343, 6,341,379, 5,884,331, 11,986,117 and 9,763,485 as well as USPAP’s 2023/0255278, 2023/0090869, 2022/0273120, 2022/0175161, 2021/0298392, 2020/0077819, 2019/0246712, 2017/0258209, 2017/0049279, 2010/0256716 and 20050262613 all disclose garments similar to that claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON R EASTMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3132. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Justin C. Mikowski can be reached at (571) 272-8525. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON R EASTMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3673
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 08, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595767
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENGINE WEAR REDUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584423
TURBINE AND TURBOCHARGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577881
TURBINE SHROUD ASSEMBLIES WITH ANTI-MIGRATION SEALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571410
BRACE FOR CEILING DROP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571329
ALTERING STRUCTURAL RESPONSE OF TWO-PIECE HOLLOW-VANE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+18.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 878 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month