Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/909,829

Organic Light Emitting Diode Display Device and Head Mounted Display Device Comprising Same

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 08, 2024
Priority
Dec 04, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0173423
Examiner
WILLIAMS, JOSEPH L
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
789 granted / 953 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
962
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 953 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Baik et al. (US 2025/0176415) . The applied reference has a common assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. Regarding independent claim 1, Baik et al. (‘415) teaches in figure 2 and the corresponding text, an organic light emitting diode display device, comprising: a substrate (100) including a first sub-pixel (SP1), a second sub-pixel (SP2), and a third sub-pixel (SP3); a first insulating layer (150) on the substrate; a first reflective electrode (311) on the first insulating layer in the first sub-pixel; a second insulating layer (200) covering the first reflective electrode and on the first insulating layer; a second reflective electrode (323) on the second insulating layer in the second sub-pixel; a third insulating layer (250) covering the second reflective electrode and on the second insulating layer; a third reflective electrode (335) on the third insulating layer in the third sub-pixel; and at least one corrugation formation layer (160, paragraph 0068) under at least one of the first reflective electrode, the second reflective electrode, and the third reflective electrode, the at least one corrugation formation layer having a corrugated surface. Regarding dependent claim 4, Baik et al. (‘415) teaches a first anode electrode (317) on the third insulating layer in the first sub-pixel; a second anode electrode (327) on the third insulating layer in the second sub-pixel; a third anode electrode (337) on the third reflective electrode in the third sub-pixel; a light emitting layer (350) on the first anode electrode, the second anode electrode, and the third anode electrode; and a cathode electrode (370) on the light emitting layer, wherein each of a lower surface and an upper surface of the light emitting layer has corrugation, and wherein each of a lower surface and an upper surface of the cathode electrode has corrugation ( up and down steps). Regarding dependent claim 5, Baik et al. (‘415) teaches the at least one corrugation formation layer comprises a corrugation formation layer between the first insulating layer and the first reflective electrode (see paragraph 0068). Regarding dependent claim 15, Baik et al. (‘415) teaches in figures 16-17 a head mounted display device, comprising: a left-eye eyepiece (21); a right-eye eyepiece (22); a left-eye display device configured to provide a first image to the left-eye eyepiece, wherein the left-eye display device is the organic light emitting diode display device of claim 1; and a right-eye display device configured to provide a second image to the right-eye eyepiece, wherein the right-eye eyepiece is the organic light emitting diode display device of claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 3, and 6-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2025/0204202 teaches the state of the art for an organic display device. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH L WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-2465. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 6:30 AM- 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JAMES R. GREECE can be reached at (571) 272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JOSEPH L. WILLIAMS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2875 /JOSEPH L WILLIAMS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707863
ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707864
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701885
DISPLAY DEVICE FOR IMPROVING DISPLAYING QUALITY AND DISPLAY PANEL THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12702071
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696601
DRIVING BACKPLATE, DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 953 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month