Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/909,890

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 08, 2024
Priority
Dec 09, 2021 — CN 202111500415.1 +1 more
Examiner
SHEN, YUZHEN
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Innolux Corporation
OA Round
4 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
524 granted / 740 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.4%
+14.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 740 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Detailed Action 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment 2. The Amendment filed on 06/08/2026 has been entered. Claims 1 and 5 have been amended. Claims 11-12 have been canceled. Claims 1, 3-6, and 8-10 remain pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 4. Claims 1, 3-5, and 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as unpatentable over Chen (US 20220198175 A1; Chen’175) in view of Chen (US 20200043400 A1; Chen’400) and further in view of Baek (US 20220190061 A1). Regarding claim 1, Chen’175 (e.g., Figs. 4-5 and 7-9) discloses an electronic device, comprising: a substrate (substrate 110) comprising a surface (surface 111); a first insulating layer (insulating layer B1) disposed on the surface (surface 111) of the substrate (substrate 110), wherein the first insulating layer (insulating layer B1) comprises a first hole (hole H13); a second insulating layer (insulating layer I7) disposed on the surface (surface 111) of the substrate (substrate 110) and the first insulating laver (insulating layer B1), wherein the second insulating laver (insulating layer I7) comprises a second hole (a hole for pad P1) and a third hole (a hole for pad P2), and the second hole (a hole for pad P1) and the third hole (a hole for pad P1) are separated; a first active element (transistor T1 a; [0051]) disposed on the surface (surface 111) of the substrate (substrate 110); a second active element (transistor T2; [0036]) disposed on the surface (surface 111) of the substrate (substrate 110); a photosensor (optical sensor 120A; [0048] and [0052]) disposed in the first hole (hole H13) of the first insulating layer (insulating layer B1) and electrically connected to the first active element (transistor T1 a; [0051]); a light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A; [0048]) and electrically connected to the second active element (transistor T2; [0036]); a first connecting element (pad P1; [0062]) electrically connected to and overlapped with the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A), wherein the first connecting element (pad P1) is disposed in the second hole (hole for pad P1) of the second insulating layer (insulating layer I7); and a second connecting element (pad P2; [0062]) electrically connected to and overlapped with the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A), wherein the second connecting element (pad P2) is disposed in the third hole (hole for pad P2) of the second insulating layer (insulating layer I7), wherein the first connecting element (pad P1) and the second connecting element (pad P2) are structurally separated along a direction parallel to the surface (surface 111) of the substrate (substrate 110). Chen’175 discloses a light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A; [0048]) disposed on the second insulating layer (insulating layer I7), but does not disclose a third insulating layer and the light-emitting unit disposed in a hole (fourth hole) of the third insulating layer. However, Chen’400 (e.g., Fig. 1) discloses a light-emitting unit (light-emitting element LD) and a third insulating layer (insulating layer OC) comprising a fourth hole (hole for to accommodate the light-emitting element LD), and the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element LD) disposed in the fourth hole of the third insulating layer (insulating layer OC), wherein the third insulating layer (insulating layer OC) disposed on the surface of the substrate (substrate 110) and the second insulating layer (insulating layer 160). In addition, Chen’400 (e.g., Fig. 1) also discloses a first connecting element (first pad BP) and a second connecting element (second pad BP) disposed in a second hole and a third hole of the second insulating layer (insulating layer 160) and electrically connected to and overlapped with the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element LD). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching from Chen’400 to the electronic device of Chen’175. The combination/motivation would be to provide a cover layer to protect the light-emitting element. Chen’175 (e.g., Figs. 4-5 and 7-9) discloses a substrate (substrate 110) comprising a surface (surface 111); and a first insulating layer disposed on the surface of the substrate (since the insulating layer B1 is directly disposed and resting on the bottom surface 111 of the substrate 110, the insulating layer B1 can be described as being on the surface 111 of the substrate 110). As pointed out by the applicant in the Remark, the difference of Chen’175 and the claimed invention is that the optical sensing element 120A and the light-emitting element 130A are not disposed on the same side of the surface 111 of the substrate 110. The examiner further cites Baek as a reference. Baek (e.g., Figs. 7 and 9) discloses a display device similar to that disclosed by Chen’175, comprising: a light-emitting unit (light-emitting unit LD) and a photosensor (optical sensor PD), comprising: PNG media_image1.png 709 1075 media_image1.png Greyscale a substrate (substrate BL) comprising a surface (surface BS); a first insulating layer (insulating layer INS1) disposed on the surface (surface BS) of the substrate (substrate BL), wherein the first insulating layer (insulating layer INS1) comprises a first hole (hole H1), and a photosensor (optical sensor PD) disposed in the first hole (hole H) of the first insulating layer (insulating layer INS1). Baek (e.g., Figs. 7 and 9) also discloses the electronic device comprising: a third insulating layer (insulating layer TEF) disposed on the surface (surface BS) of the substrate (substrate BL) and the first insulating layer (insulating layer INS1), wherein the third insulating layer comprises a fourth hole (hole H4), and the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element LD) disposed in the fourth hole (hole H4) of the third insulating layer (insulating layer OC). Therefore, Baek (e.g., Figs. 7 and 9) discloses both the optical sensing element PD and the light-emitting element LD are disposed on the same side of the surface of the substrate BL. It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching from Baek to the display device of Chen’175 for a rearrangement of the optical sensor and the light-emitting element. Specifically, it is merely a design choice to arrange the optical sensing element PD and the light-emitting element LD on the same side or on the opposite side of the substrate, and such a rearrangement does not modify the operation of the device and involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950) and In re Kuhle, 526 F.2d 553, 188 USPQ 7 (CCPA 1975). Chen’175 does not disclose a light-impermeable layer and a color filter as claimed. However, Baek (e.g., Figs. 7 and 9) further discloses the display device comprising: a light-impermeable layer (layer BM) comprising a first opening (opening corresponding to EA) and a second opening (opening corresponding to SA), wherein the light-emitting unit is (light-emitting unit LD) at least partially overlapped with the first opening (opening EA), and the photosensor (optical sensor PD) is at least partially overlapped with the second opening (opening SA); and a color filter (color filter CF1) disposed in the first opening (opening EA) of the light-impermeable layer (layer BM). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the color filter as taught from Baek to the electronic device of Chen’175. The combination/motivation would be to provide a color filter to cut off unwanted emission light and to improve detection sensitivity. Regarding claim 3, Chen’175 in view of Chen’400 and further in view of Baek discloses the electronic device of claim 1, Chen’175 (e.g., Figs. 4-5 and 7-9) discloses wherein the photosensor (optical sensor 120A) is not overlapped with the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A). Regarding claim 4, Chen’175 in view of Chen’400 and further in view of Baek discloses the electronic device of claim 1, Chen’175 (e.g., Figs. 4-5 and 7-9) discloses the electronic device further comprising: a semiconductor structure (transistor T2; [0036]) electrically connected to the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A) through the first connecting element (pad P1). Regarding claim 5, Chen’175 in view of Chen’400 and further in view of Baek discloses the electronic device of claim 1, Baek (e.g., Figs. 7 and 9) discloses wherein the color filter layer (color filter layer CF1) overlapped with at least a part of the light-emitting unit (light-emitting unit LD). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the color filter as taught from Baek to the electronic device of Chen’175 in view of Chen’400 for the same reason above. Regarding claim 8, Chen’175 in view of Chen’400 and further in view of Baek discloses the electronic device of claim 1, Chen’175 (e.g., Figs. 4-5 and 7-9) discloses wherein the first connecting element (pad P1) is connected with a first end of the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A), and the second connecting element (pad P2) is connected with a second end of the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A). Regarding claim 9, Chen’175 in view of Chen’400 and further in view of Baek discloses the electronic device of claim 8, Chen’175 (e.g., Figs. 4-5 and 7-9) discloses wherein the first end of the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A) is disposed opposite to the second end of the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 130A) along the direction parallel to the surface of the substrate (e.g., Fig. 5). Regarding claim 10, Chen’175 in view of Chen’400 and further in view of Baek discloses the electronic device of claim 1, Chen’175 (e.g., Figs. 4-5 and 7-9) discloses wherein the first connecting element (pad P1) and the second connecting element (pad P1) are disposed oppositely along the direction parallel to the surface of the substrate (e.g., Fig. 5), and the first connecting element (pad P1) and the second connecting element (pad P1) are not structurally contacted (e.g., Fig. 5). 5. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as unpatentable over Chen (US 20220198175 A1; Chen’175) in view of Chen (US 20200043400 A1; Chen’400) and Baek (US 20220190061 A1) and further in view of EMURA (US 20220173283 A1). Regarding claim 6, Chen’175 in view of Chen’400 and further in view of Baek discloses the electronic device of claim 1, but does not disclose a wavelength conversion layer overlapped with at least a part of the light-emitting unit. However, EMURA (e.g., Figs. 1A and 3) discloses a light-emitting unit same as that disclosed by Chen’175 and Chen’400, further comprising: a wavelength conversion layer (wavelength conversion layer 30; [0032]) overlapped with at least a part of the light-emitting unit (light-emitting element 10). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching from EMURA to the electronic device of Chen’175 in view of Chen’400 and Baek. The combination/motivation would be to provide an emission light with a desired color to improve detection sensitivity. Response to Arguments 6. Regarding claim 1, applicant’s arguments have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references being used in the current rejection. In view of amendments, the reference of Baek (US 20220190061 A1) has been used for new ground rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YUZHEN SHEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1407. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00-18:00. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh Nguyen can be reached on 571-272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YUZHEN SHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jun 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 18, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 16, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 08, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705008
CONTROL METHOD, APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704729
SYSTEM FOR AND METHOD OF PROJECTING AUGMENTATION IMAGERY IN A HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701923
VIBRATION DEVICE, TOUCH DISPLAY PANEL AND ELECTRONIC PRODUCT
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696671
DISPLAY PANEL HAVING FUNCTIONAL DEVICE SETTING REGION AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693204
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPTICALLY RECOGNIZING A DISCRETE ENTITY FROM A PLURALITY OF DISCRETE ENTITIES
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 740 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month