Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/910,327

MOLD AND INJECTION MOLDING METHOD

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Oct 09, 2024
Priority
Dec 07, 2023 — JP 2023-207112
Examiner
DANIELS, MATTHEW J
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
506 granted / 727 resolved
+4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
773
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 727 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Group I, claims 1-2, were elected without traverse in the March 25, 2026 response. Group II, claim 3 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zanella (US 4,584,155). As to claim 1, Zanella teaches a metal mold (4:51; Fig. 8) capable of the stated intended use of covering a side face of a battery with resin. Zanella provides a space (Fig. 8, item 15) in which a first end portion of an article (item 1 to left of 20 and 21) can be placed. Zanella teaches a fixing member (item 20) which can fix the first end portion of the article in the space (item 15). The Zanella article (item 1) has a second end portion (item 1 to right of 20 and 21) opposite the first end portion that protrudes from the space. Zanella teaches a fixed part (item 21) which supports a first end face of the article in a thickness direction and a movable part (item 20) movable in the thickness direction to press against a second end face of the article on an opposite side of the first end face. The Zanella article (item 1) can be fixed by sandwiching the first end face and second end face between the fixed and movable parts (as shown in Fig. 8). The pressure applied to the article by the movable part is established by the spring (22) and is therefore at most a threshold value established by the spring (and its spring constant). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zanella (US 4,584,155) in view of Sano (US 4,470,786). Zanella teaches the subject matter of claim 1 above under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). As to claim 2, Zanella is silent to the claimed movable part first inclined portion and auxiliary part with a second inclined portion and moving the movable part in the thickness direction by moving the movable auxiliary part and contact between the first and second inclined portions. Sano teaches a first inclined portion (item 23) with a retractable (movable) support pin (item 14) that moves in the thickness direction to contact a preform. Sano provides a movable auxiliary part (item 22) with a second inclined portion where contact between the first (item 23) and second (item 22) inclined portions causes movement of the movable part. In the combination with Zanella, one would have recognized that the inclined interface taught by Sano could be used to actuate the Zanella movable part. It would have been prima facie obvious to incorporate the Sano actuation device into Zanella because (a) Zanella teaches/suggests applying pressure to an article in the thickness direction and Sano teaches a device for applying pressure to an article in the thickness direction within the scope of the Zanella teaching/suggestion, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized there was a reasonable expectation of success in light of the fact that both references operate in the thickness direction. Alternatively, (b) Zanella teaches/suggests applying pressure to an article in the thickness direction and Sano teaches a device for applying pressure to an article in the thickness direction that one would have recognized to be an obvious interchangeable substitute device for applying pressure in a thickness direction. One of ordinary skill in the art could have substituted one pressure element for another to provide the predictable result that the Zanella seal would still apply pressure in the thickness direction. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Additional references are cited on the attached PTO-892. However, none of the references actually show the claimed fixing member with a fixed part and movable part as claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW J DANIELS whose telephone number is (313)446-4826. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW J DANIELS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 09, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 20, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702807
Methods For Making Microneedles Using Adjustment Of Component Solubility In Casting Formulations
4y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698364
GEL COMPOSITIONS WITH TUNABLE HARDNESS
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697791
MOULDING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691649
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PART, IN PARTICULAR A PART MADE FROM A COMPOSITE MATERIAL
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679006
EMBOSSED RELEASE FILM, VACUUM BAGGING SYSTEM, AND METHODS OF FABRICATING COMPOSITE PARTS USING THE SAME
5y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+25.3%)
3y 1m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 727 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month