Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/910,539

Contact Bridge and Method for Manufacturing a Contact Bridge

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 09, 2024
Priority
Oct 09, 2023 — EU 23202410.9
Examiner
JIMENEZ, ANTHONY R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Te Connectivity Austria GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
975 granted / 1106 resolved
+28.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1122
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
43.1%
+3.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1106 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending in the current application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-14 and 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Uitto et al. (PCT Pat. No. WO 2012/168554 A1, hereinafter “Uitto”). Specifically, regarding Claim 1, Uitto discloses an electrical contact bridge for an electromechanical device (Abstract; see also, e.g., FIGS. 2 and 8A), comprising a bridge element (26, 27; FIG. 9A) having a first contacting portion (26A; FIG. 8B, reproduced and annotated below) engaging a first electrical terminal (11A; FIG. 8B) of the electromechanical device (FIGS. 3 and 8B), a second contacting portion (26B) engaging a second electrical terminal (11B) of the electromechanical device (FIGS. 3 and 8B), and a middle portion (MP) between the first contacting portion (26A; FIG. 9A) and the second contacting portion (26B), and a spring element (27) having a flat spring (27 itself) attached to the middle portion (MP). PNG media_image1.png 474 584 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 520 748 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 516 606 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2, Uitto discloses that the spring element (27) has an attaching portion (29; FIG. 8A, reproduced and annotated above) attached to the middle portion (MP), a first spring arm (SA1; FIG. 8A above) extending from the attaching portion (29) in a first direction (D1; FIG. 8A above), and a second spring arm (SA2; FIG. 8A below) extending from the attaching portion (29) in a second direction (D2) different from the first direction (D1; FIG. 8A above). Regarding Claim 3, Uitto discloses that the first contacting portion (26A) and the second contacting portion (26B) extend along a common contacting plane (CCP; FIG. 8A above). Regarding Claim 4, Uitto discloses that the first direction (D1) forms a first angle with the common contacting plane (CCP; FIG. 8B) and the second direction (D2) forms a second angle with the common contacting plane (CCP; FIG. 8B), the first angle and/or the second angle has a value of less than 60° (FIG. 8A). Regarding Claim 5, Uitto discloses that the first spring arm (SA1) has a first engagement portion (an inner surface of SA1 in contact with CCP) and the second spring arm (SA2) has a second engagement portion (an inner surface of SA2 in contact with CCP), the first engagement portion and the second engagement portion resiliently engage a movable part (26, 27; see, e.g., FIG. 8B) of the electromechanical device (p. 8, line 34 – p. 9, line 1). Regarding Claim 6, Uitto discloses that the first engagement portion and/or the second engagement portion extends along a direction parallel to the common contacting plane (CCP; FIG. 8A above). Regarding Claim 7, Uitto discloses that the first engagement portion and/or the second engagement portion has a recurved portion that is recurved toward the bridge element (26, 27; FIG. 8A above). Regarding Claim 8, Uitto discloses that the first engagement portion and/or the second engagement portion has a projection (P1, P2; FIG. 8A above) that projects in a direction away from the bridge element (26, 27). Regarding Claim 9, Uitto discloses that the projection is a circular embossment (each of P1 and P2 encircles a portion of 28 and is in a sectionalized or patterned structure; FIG. 8A. Regarding Claim 10, Uitto discloses that the middle portion (MP) has a U-shaped portion (USP; a half of USP is U-shaped, FIG. 8B) in a plane perpendicular to the common contacting plane (CCP; FIGS. 8A and 8B). Regarding Claim 11, Uitto discloses that the middle portion (MP) has a cam element (USP; FIG. 8B above) received in a matching groove (31) of a movable part (top surface of 27) of the electromechanical device (FIG. 8B). Regarding Claim 12, Uitto discloses that the cam element (USP) protrudes in a direction parallel to the common contacting plane (a width direction of USP; FIG. 8B). Regarding Claim 13, Uitto discloses that the cam element (USP) protrudes orthogonal to the first direction (D1) and/or the second direction (D2; FIG. 8B). Regarding Claim 14, Uitto discloses that the middle portion (MP) has a bridge groove (31) receiving a matching cam (USP) of a movable part (26, 27) of the electromechanical device. Regarding Claim 16, Uitto discloses that the flat spring (27) is press-fit or snap-fit to the middle portion (MP; p. 8, line 34 – p. 9, line 1). Claims 17 and 18 include language substantially similar to that of Claim 5 and are rejected for reasons at least similar to those discussed above. Regarding Claim 19, Uitto discloses an electromagnetically movable armature attached to the movable part. Claim 20 includes language substantially similar to that of Claim 16 and is rejected for reasons at least similar to those discussed above. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 15 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure. Swan (U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2,598,856 A) and Schwab (U.S. Pat. No. 5,555,972) each appear to disclose the limitations of Claim 1. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY R. JIMENEZ whose telephone number is 313-446-6518. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday, 1030am - 9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke, can be reached at (571) 272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY R JIMENEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 09, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738430
MOVABLE UNIT, SWITCHOVER SWITCH, AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR THE SWITCHOVER SWITCH
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725744
OPERATION APPARATUS FOR ROTARY SWITCH AND ROTARY SWITCH
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725742
SWITCH DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12712136
ON-LOAD TAP CHANGER AND TAP-CHANGING TRANSFORMER HAVING AN ON-LOAD TAP CHANGER
4y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12712138
DEVICE FOR REMOTELY ZEROIZING AN ADVANCED GROUND-AIR RADIO
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 2m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1106 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month