Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 07, 2026
Application No. 18/910,886

SYSTEM, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA RELATED TO CORRECTION OF VISION DEFECTS USING A VISUAL DISPLAY

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Oct 09, 2024
Priority
Mar 17, 2015 — provisional 62/134,422 +4 more
Examiner
SAHLE, MAHIDERE S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Raytrx LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
898 granted / 1131 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1178
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
64.9%
+24.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1131 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgment is made of receipt of Information Disclosure Statements (PTO-1449) filed 01/02/2025 and 04/02/2026. An initialed copy is attached to this Office Action. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,137,974. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Current Application USP No. 12,137,974 1. A system comprising: goggles or glasses housing technology capable of photon-on-retina projection; a display controller configured: to receive and to store a retinal map associated with a user identifying the user's usable field of vision, the retinal map including at least one boundary indicating an area to be modified within the patient's vision; to receive an image from a camera associated with the user; to generate an image distortion map including shifting image data located within the boundary outwardly along a plurality of rays starting at an estimated center point of the area to be modified within the patient's vision to outside the boundary such that the image data from the center point to an edge of the image is compressed from the boundary to the edge of the image; and to modulate the image based on the image distortion map to produce an intentionally distorted image, where the technology capable of photon-on-retina projection is capable of projecting the intentionally distorted image onto the user's retina in the user's usable field of vision. 1. A system comprising: goggles or glasses housing technology capable of photon-on-retina projection; a display controller configured: to receive and to store a retinal map associated with a user identifying the user's usable field of vision, the retinal map including at least one boundary indicating an area to be modified within the patient's vision; to receive an image from a camera associated with the user; to generate an image distortion map including shifting image data located within the boundary outwardly along a plurality of rays starting at an estimated center point of the area to be modified within the patient's vision to outside the boundary such that the image data from the center point to an edge of the image is compressed from the boundary to the edge of the image; and to modulate the image based on the image distortion map to produce an intentionally distorted image, where the technology capable of photon-on-retina projection is capable of projecting the intentionally distorted image onto the user's retina in the user's usable field of vision. Claim Objections Claim 1is objected to because of the following informalities: the preamble recites “a system”. It is recommended that the preamble refers to the invention as “a system for the correction of vision defects” or similar language presented in the specification in order to provide further context. Appropriate correction is required. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHIDERE S SAHLE whose telephone number is (571)270-3329. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached at 571 272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAHIDERE S SAHLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 7/23/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697024
METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED MACHINE-ASSISTED DETECTION OF OCULAR DISEASE CONDITIONS IN HUMAN EYES CAPTURED USING VISIBLE ILLUMINATION LIGHT SOURCES AND DIGITAL CAMERA SYSTEMS
5y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12685470
A DEVICE AND A COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR DETERMINING A BEHAVIOR OF A TARGET USER
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681277
IMAGING LENS ASSEMBLY MODULE, CAMERA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669672
LENS MECHANISM AND LENS DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12656572
OPTICAL SYSTEM
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.1%)
2y 7m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1131 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month