Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/911,197

SOUND SOURCE LOCALIZATION METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 09, 2024
Priority
Oct 18, 2023 — CN 202311350678.8
Examiner
SUTHERS, DOUGLAS JOHN
Art Unit
2695
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Ubtech Robotics Corp. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
607 granted / 794 resolved
+14.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
811
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 794 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION In the response to this office action, the examiner respectfully requests that support be shown for language added to any original claims on amendment and any new claims. That is, indicate support for newly added claim language by specifically pointing to page(s) and line numbers in the specification and/or drawing figure(s). This will assist the examiner in prosecuting this application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 6, 7, 13, 14, and 20 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 6 states “the first audio frame and the second audio frame” which should be “the first audio frame and the at least two second audio frames” to match the wording of claim 1. Claims 13 and 20 are objected in an analogous manner. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 8-9, and 15-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chu et al. (US 20040032796 A1). Regarding claim 8, Chu discloses an electronic device (see figure 1B for block diagram, 1A, 2A, and 2B for physical embodiments) comprising: one or more processors (160 of figure 1B); and a memory (155) coupled to the one or more processors, the memory storing programs that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause performance of operations (paragraph [0022]) comprising: obtaining a first audio frame and at least two second audio frames that are to be compared (Chu calls them blocks, 640 samples, paragraph [0023]), wherein the first audio frame and the at least two second audio frames are synchronously sampled (paragraph [0022]), the first audio frame is obtained by processing sound signals collected by the first microphone, the at least two second audio frames are obtained by processing sound signals collected by the second microphones (paragraph [0022]), and the first microphone is a reference microphone (see middle microphone of figure 1A); calculating a time delay estimation between the first audio frame and each of the at least two second audio frames (see abstract, paragraphs [0008], [0020] and [0040]); and determining a sound source orientation corresponding to the first audio frame and the at least two second audio frames through a preset time delay-orientation lookup table (see abstract, paragraphs [0008], paragraphs [0050] to [0051]) according to the time delay estimation between the first audio frame and each of the at least two second audio frames (paragraphs [0050] to [0051]). Regarding claim 9, Chu discloses wherein the time delay-orientation lookup table is constructed according to the following steps: constructing a plurality of virtual sound source points (such as candidate source positions 1, 2, and 3 of figure 1A) based on preset angle intervals and preset distance intervals in a microphone array coordinate system (x, y, z, see figure 1A), wherein the microphone array coordinate system is created with a center of the microphone array as an origin (see figure 2A, paragraph [0025]); for each virtual sound source point of the virtual sound source points, calculating a time delay combination corresponding to the virtual sound source point according to speed of sound, a distance from the virtual sound source point to each microphone of the microphone array and a sampling frequency of the microphone array, wherein the time delay combination is configured to store time delay information of each of the second microphones relative to the first microphone (paragraphs [0050] to [0051]); and constructing the time delay-orientation lookup table according to an orientation and the time delay combination corresponding to each virtual sound source point (paragraphs [0050] to [0051]). Claims 1 and 15 are rejected in an analogous manner to claim 8. Claims 2 and 16 are rejected in an analogous manner to claim 9. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 10-12, and 17-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 6, 7, 13, 14, and 20 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the claim objections set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS JOHN SUTHERS whose telephone number is (571)272-0563. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8 am -5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivian Chin can be reached at 571-272-7848. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOUGLAS J SUTHERS/ Examiner, Art Unit 2695 /PAUL KIM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12670893
AUDIO SIGNAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEM
1y 12m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671934
EARPHONE WITH BINAURAL BEATS FUNCTION
1y 12m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659683
REPRESENTATION AND RENDERING OF AUDIO OBJECTS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658170
NOISE REDUCTION SYSTEM HAVING A COMBINATION UNIT, METHOD OF OPERATING THE SYSTEM AND USE OF THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646399
SOUND DETECTION AND ALERT SYSTEM FOR A WORKSPACE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+11.1%)
3y 0m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 794 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month