Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/911,428

MAGNETIC COUPLING FOR SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Priority
Oct 11, 2023 — provisional 63/589,618
Examiner
KUO, JONATHAN T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Medos International Sàrl
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
342 granted / 474 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
507
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
87.4%
+47.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 474 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 5-6, 20-21 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 6/18/2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of species A in the reply filed on 6/18/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 7-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kozak (US 20080041195 A9; 2/21/2008; cited in IDS). Regarding claim 1, Kozak teaches a surgical instrument driver, comprising: a non-magnetic body having a proximal end and a distal end with a distal-facing recess configured to receive a portion of a surgical instrument, the recess including a surface configured to contact the portion of the surgical instrument disposed in the recess to impart torque thereto (Fig. 1-2; [0050]); and a magnet disposed within the body such that the magnet is configured to extend proximal to a proximal end of a surgical instrument disposed within the recess and radially outward beyond the proximal end of the surgical instrument disposed within the recess (Fig. 1-3b). Note that while Kozak does not explicitly teach surgical instrument this is an intended use; for the purposes of examination, Applicant is reminded that this is a product claim. Intended use/functional language does not require that reference specifically teach the intended use of the element. A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Kozak’s structure/device is capable of being used as a surgical instrument. Regarding claim 2, Kozak teaches wherein the magnet is a cylindrical magnet and a central axis of the cylindrical magnet is substantially perpendicular to a central longitudinal axis of the body (Fig. 2-3c). Regarding claim 3, Kozak teaches wherein the magnet is magnetized such that a radially inward portion of the magnet relative to a central longitudinal axis of the body has a first polarity and a radially outward portion of the magnet relative to the central longitudinal axis of the body has a second polarity opposite the first polarity (Fig. 2-3c; [0044]). Regarding claim 4, Kozak teaches wherein the magnet is disposed such that a distal portion of the magnet relative to the central longitudinal axis of the body is distal to the proximal end of the surgical instrument disposed within the recess and a proximal portion of the magnet relative to the central longitudinal axis of the body is proximal to the proximal end of the surgical instrument disposed within the recess (interpreted in light of instant Fig. 8; Kozak Fig. 2-3c; [0038]). Regarding claim 7, Kozak teaches wherein the body includes a central lumen extending from the proximal end of the body to the recess (Fig. 1-3c). Regarding claim 8, Kozak teaches wherein the magnet is disposed outside the central lumen (Fig. 1-3c). Regarding claim 9, Kozak teaches wherein the magnet further comprises a plurality of magnets (Fig. 1-3c). Regarding claim 10, Kozak teaches wherein the plurality of magnets further comprises three magnets (Fig. 3c). Regarding claim 11, Kozak teaches wherein the plurality of magnets are disposed around a circumference of the body (Fig. 1-3c). Regarding claim 12, Kozak teaches wherein an outer surface of the body includes a feature to facilitate a user gripping the body (Fig. 1-2; Fig. 3c; [0029]; [0035]). Regarding claim 13, Kozak teaches wherein the surface of the recess is substantially planar (Fig. 2-3c; [0031] “hexagonal…octagonal shaped cross section”). Regarding claim 14, Kozak teaches wherein the recess is substantially hexagonal with a plurality of substantially planar surfaces forming a circumference thereof (Fig. 2-3c; [0031] “hexagonal channel…shaped cross section”). Regarding claim 15, Kozak teaches a surgical instrument driver, comprising: a modular handle body with a recess at a distal end of the body, the recess extending through a portion of a length of the body and configured to engage with a proximal end of a surgical instrument (Fig. 1-3c); and a plurality of cylindrical magnets fixed within the body and configured to produce a magnetic field that urges a portion of the surgical instrument into the opening (Fig. 1-3c). Note that while Kozak does not explicitly teach surgical instrument this is an intended use; for the purposes of examination, Applicant is reminded that this is a product claim. Intended use/functional language does not require that reference specifically teach the intended use of the element. A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Kozak’s structure/device is capable of being used as a surgical instrument. Regarding claim 16, Kozak teaches wherein each magnet is fixed within a bore formed in a distal portion of the modular handle body to locate the magnet in radially spaced-apart relation to a central longitudinal axis of the modular handle body (Fig. 2-3c; [0044]). Regarding claim 17, Kozak teaches wherein the recess includes a hex shaped portion at a distal end thereof (Fig. 2-3c; [0031] “hexagonal channel…shaped cross section”). Regarding claim 18, Kozak teaches wherein the plurality of cylindrical magnets are magnetized axially such that a first circular surface of each magnet contains a magnetic charge opposing the charge of an opposing second circular surface of each magnet (Fig. 2-3c; [0038]; [0044]). Regarding claim 19, Kozak teaches wherein a portion of the plurality of cylindrical magnets overlap the hex shaped portion of the recess along a central longitudinal axis of the modular handle body (Fig. 2-3c; [0031]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jonathan T Kuo whose telephone number is (408)918-7534. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10 a.m. - 6 p.m. PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niketa Patel can be reached at 571-272-4156. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JONATHAN T KUO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673216
INTERNAL ULTRAVIOLET THERAPY
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667263
METHOD OF MONITORING THE HYDRATION OF A LIVING BODY
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667726
ADAPTIVE ELECTRICAL NEUROSTIMULATION TREATMENT TO REDUCE PAIN PERCEPTION
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667423
LASER ABLATION SURGERY SYSTEM WITH SAFETY CONTROL OF TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE AT SURGICAL SITE AND METHOD OF USE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661051
ELECTROCARDIOGRAM INTERPRETATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.0%)
2y 11m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 474 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month