Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/911,550

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INCREASING CAPACITY OF COMMUNICATION CHANNELS IN A NETWORK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Priority
Oct 13, 2023 — IN 202341069101
Examiner
CHANG, KAI J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tejas Networks Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
310 granted / 422 resolved
+13.5% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
429
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§103
65.0%
+25.0% vs TC avg
§102
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 422 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55 with the benefit of a prior-filed application with the priority of Indian Patent Application No. 202341069101 filed on October 13, 2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 – 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Samuel Asangbeng Atungsiri (US Patent Application Publication 2023/0056886), and further in view of Zhang et al. (CN 107949065 A). Hereinafter Atungsiri and Zhang. Regarding claim 1, Atungsiri discloses a method for determining a combinatorial capacity of a communication channel, the method comprising: determining one or more waveforms associated with the one or more subcarriers based on the distributed power (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); and mapping a block of bits from a received bit stream with each of the one or more waveforms of a waveform combination, wherein the waveform combination is selected among predetermined waveform combinations and recording the mapping (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]). However, Atungsiri does not explicitly disclose “distributing power across one or more subcarriers by varying a phase and an amplitude of the one or more subcarriers over a predetermined period.” Zhang discloses the system targets initialization of the power distributing aspects to improve the greedy algorithm by selecting system modulation method with (0, BPSK, QAM, 16QAM, 64 QAM, 128QAM), where each time of allocating the selected subsystem total power increment to make NOMA (Non-OrthogonalMultiple Access) minimum until the system ends the allocation process until the system distributing the total power of one bit (page 3 paragraph 3 – 4). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Atungsiri and Zhang before him or her, to incorporate the power distribution system as taught by Zhang, to improve the dynamic and adaptive generation of waveforms of Atungsiri for the transmission of data in accordance with channel conditions. The motivation for doing so would have been to improve the transmission performance by overcoming the different existing technology (page 2 paragraph 4 of Zhang). Regarding claim 2, Atungsiri and Zhang disclose the method as claimed in claim 1, Atungsiri discloses wherein the method comprises: receiving the bit stream (the UE receives reference symbols from the eNodeB, paragraph [0129]); identifying the block of bits from the received bit stream (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); selecting, a waveform among the one or more waveforms to be transmitted based on the block of bits (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); matching, all the waveforms of the waveform combination with a received waveform (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); selecting, a waveform from a waveform combination (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); and determining a combinatorial capacity of the communication channel based on the selection of the waveform combination (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]). Regarding claim 3, Atungsiri and Zhang disclose the method as claimed in claim 1, Atungsiri discloses comprising modulating a subcarrier among the one or more subcarriers into an in-phase component and a quadrature-phase component and utilizing the in-phase component and the quadrature-phase component of the subcarrier over the predetermined period for generating the one or more waveforms (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]). Regarding claim 4, Atungsiri and Zhang disclose the method as claimed in claim 1, Atungsiri discloses comprising determining a capacity of the communication channel by determining a base two logarithmic value of the total number of waveforms in the waveform combination (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]). Regarding claim 5, Atungsiri discloses a system for determining a combinatorial capacity of a communication channel, the system comprising: a processor communicatively coupled to a transceiver of the system (the communications device includes controller connected to receiver and transmitter, paragraphs [0051] – [0052]); a memory operatively coupled with the processor, wherein said memory stores instructions which, when executed by the processor (the communications device includes controllers configured to carry out instructions which are stored on a computer readable medium, such as a non-volatile memory, i.e. the processing steps described herein is carried out by a microprocessor in conjunction with a random access memory, operating according to instructions stored on a computer readable medium, paragraph [0053]), cause the processor to: determine one or more waveforms associated with the one or more subcarriers to be transmitted based on the distributed power (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); map a block of bits received from a bit stream, with each of the one or more waveforms and record the mapping (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]). However, Atungsiri does not explicitly disclose “distribute power across one or more subcarriers by varying a phase and an amplitude of the one or more subcarriers over a predetermined period.” Zhang discloses the system targets initialization of the power distributing aspects to improve the greedy algorithm by selecting system modulation method with (0, BPSK, QAM, 16QAM, 64 QAM, 128QAM), where each time of allocating the selected subsystem total power increment to make NOMA (Non-OrthogonalMultiple Access) minimum until the system ends the allocation process until the system distributing the total power of one bit (page 3 paragraph 3 – 4). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Atungsiri and Zhang before him or her, to incorporate the power distribution system as taught by Zhang, to improve the dynamic and adaptive generation of waveforms of Atungsiri for the transmission of data in accordance with channel conditions. The motivation for doing so would have been to improve the transmission performance by overcoming the different existing technology (page 2 paragraph 4 of Zhang). Regarding claim 6, Atungsiri and Zhang disclose the system as claimed in claim 5, Atungsiri discloses wherein the processor is configured to: receive the bit stream via a transmitter configured with the transceiver (the UE receives reference symbols from the eNodeB, paragraph [0129]); identify the block of bits from the received bit stream (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); select, a waveform among the one or more waveforms to be transmitted based on the block of bits (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); match, via a receiver, all the waveforms of the one or more waveforms used at the transmitter with a received waveform (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); select, at the receiver configured with the transceiver, a waveform from a waveform combination (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); and determine a combinatorial capacity of the communication channel based on the selection of the waveform combination (the UE estimates the channel conditions then transmits to the eNodeB, where the channel conditions include multiple modulation schemes indicated for use over different portions of the resource allocation, paragraph [0129]; where the Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]). Regarding claim 7, Atungsiri and Zhang disclose the system as claimed in claim 5, Atungsiri discloses wherein the processor is configured to modulate a subcarrier among the one or more subcarriers into an in-phase component and a quadrature-phase component and utilize the in-phase component and the quadrature-phase component of the subcarrier over the predetermined period for generating the one or more waveforms (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]). Regarding claim 8, Atungsiri and Zhang disclose the system as claimed in claim 5, Atungsiri discloses wherein the processor is configured to determine a capacity of the communication channel in the transceiver by determining a base two logarithmic value of the total number of waveforms in the waveform combination (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]). Regarding claim 9, Atungsiri discloses a non-transitory computer readable medium comprising a processor with executable instructions (the communications device includes controllers configured to carry out instructions which are stored on a computer readable medium, such as a non-volatile memory, i.e. the processing steps described herein is carried out by a microprocessor in conjunction with a random access memory, operating according to instructions stored on a computer readable medium, paragraph [0053]), causing the processor to: determine one or more waveforms associated with the one or more subcarriers to be transmitted based on the distributed power (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]); and map a block of bits received from a bit stream, with each of the one or more waveforms and record the mapping (the propagation channel combined with transmitter and receiver degradation in multi-carrier transmission system is B k = H k e j ( W D + W o ) + N k , WD is the doppler frequency in radians per second due to relative movement between transmitter and the receiver, Wo is the combined transmitter and receiver frequency offsets in radians per second, and N(k) is the combined noise and interference from all source impinging on subcarrier k, where the channel transfer function H(k) is H k = H ( k | e j ∆ k + k ∅ , where ∆ k is the subcarrier phase shift due to the channel, ∅ is the phase slope due to any timing offset, and |H(k)| is the amplitude fading coefficient of sub-carrier k shaped by the frequency selectivity due to multi-path propagation, where Shannon capacity equation is used for determining the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k, the equation being b k = W l o g 2 1 + | H k | 2 ( N ( k ) | 2 , where W is the subcarrier bandwidth, and b(k) is the number of bits to carry in subcarrier k using a constellation of size 2b(k) , paragraphs [0068] – [0074]). However, Atungsiri does not explicitly disclose “distribute power across one or more subcarriers by varying a phase and an amplitude of the one or more subcarriers over a predetermined period.” Zhang discloses the system targets initialization of the power distributing aspects to improve the greedy algorithm by selecting system modulation method with (0, BPSK, QAM, 16QAM, 64 QAM, 128QAM), where each time of allocating the selected subsystem total power increment to make NOMA (Non-OrthogonalMultiple Access) minimum until the system ends the allocation process until the system distributing the total power of one bit (page 3 paragraph 3 – 4). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Atungsiri and Zhang before him or her, to incorporate the power distribution system as taught by Zhang, to improve the dynamic and adaptive generation of waveforms of Atungsiri for the transmission of data in accordance with channel conditions. The motivation for doing so would have been to improve the transmission performance by overcoming the different existing technology (page 2 paragraph 4 of Zhang). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Urbain Alfred VON DER EMBSE (US Patent Application Publication 2010/0205510) – the quadrature layered modulation (QLM) which supports data rates independent of Shannon bound, where Trellis symbol and bit demodulation algorithms recover QLM data symbols and bit algorithms offer computational efficiency at a cost of decisioning errors, and correlated bit decisioning error correction decoding and re-encoding are implemented in a bit demodulation algorithm, where Trellis demodulation and trellis decoding algorithms support parallel implementations, and concatenated implementations support turbo decoding, MAP decoding, convolutional decoding, and block decoding by using the decisioning metrics available from QLM demodulation in place of generating the decisioning metrics directly from the detected symbol measurements after the QLM demodulation Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAI J CHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-5448. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 10AM-6PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marcus Smith can be reached at (571)270-1096. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kai Chang/Examiner, Art Unit 2468 /Thomas R Cairns/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2468
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12719646
TECHNIQUES FOR CONFIGURING CONTROL CHANNEL MONITORING SKIP DURATIONS
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12690079
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684051
Data Transmission Method and Electronic Device
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677114
ACCESS NETWORK SIGNALING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION FOR MULTICAST/BROADCAST SESSIONS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677301
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.0%)
3y 8m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 422 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month