Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/911,740

CURABLE POLYMER, CURABLE COMPOSITION, PREPREG, MULTILAYER BODY, METAL CLAD LAMINATE AND WIRING BOARD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Examiner
POLLEY, CHRISTOPHER M
Art Unit
1785
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Agc Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
446 granted / 613 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
643
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 613 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Arai et al (TW 202128424 A which has been machine translated). As to claim 1, 4 and 5, Arai discloses a composition for obtaining a cured article exhibiting excellent low dielectric characteristics and high adhesiveness to a metal foil (abs). The composition comprises an aromatic vinyl compound monomer, an aromatic polyene, a copolymer and olefin (abs). The aromatic polyene monomer is a polyene having a carbon of 5 or more and not more than 20 having a plurality of vinyl and/or vinylidene groups. The polyene can preferable be p-3-butenylstyrene (UX) (paragraph 20) which reads on applicant’s claimed formula I, with X being a single bond and n being 1. This is also the same material being used within the present invention examples as seen in table 1. However, this reference is silent to the use of this material in the examples. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Arai and used p-3-butenylstyrene for the polyene monomer as it is disclosed as a suitable material for the polyene monomer and therefore it would have been obvious to have chosen that material from the list of polyenes. See MPEP 2144.06. As to claim 2, Arai discloses that the composition can further contain an aromatic vinyl compound monomer which can be styrene (paragraph 19). As to claim 3, Arai discloses that the composition comprises 0-70 mass % of aromatic vinyl compound, the content of the aromatic vinyl compound, the aromatic polyene and the olefin monomer unit is 100 mass% (paragraph 16). The content of the olefin monomer unit is preferable 30 mass % or more (paragraph 24). However, this reference is silent to the amount of structural units UX based on the mol%. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Arai and made the mol % of the structural unit UX (the aromatic polyene) be from 1 to 90 mol% as Arai discloses one of ordinary skill in the art would know how to adjust the amount of these materials within the composition to form an improved article as Arai teaches that the polyene improves cure efficiency (paragraph 20) and improved dielectric properties (paragraph 23), the olefin monomer effects the toughness which results in no cracks and improved impact resistance (paragraph 24) and the aromatic vinyl effects peel strength (paragraph 22). As to claims 6-12, Arai discloses that the composition can contain other curable compounds having functional groups such as polyphenylene ether, maleimides (paragraphs 27-40). The composition can be prepreg (paragraph 40) and can also be used in the uncured or semi cured state to be adhered to a metal foil such as copper for wiring boards (paragraph 68-70). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER M POLLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-5734. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8am till 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Ruthkosky can be reached at 5712721291. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER M POLLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594689
METALLIC STONE SLABS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583966
CURABLE RESIN, CURED PRODUCT THEREOF, RESIN COMPOSITION, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CURABLE RESIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568161
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558864
GLASS ARTICLE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551307
STERILE ADAPTER DRIVE DISKS FOR USE IN A ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.8%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 613 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month