Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/911,809

METHOD OF BLOCKING ACCESS OF THREATENING USER AND PROGRAM SECURITY APPLICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Priority
Apr 28, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTKR2020095079 +3 more
Examiner
DADA, BEEMNET W
Art Unit
2435
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Lock-In Company Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
778 granted / 922 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
938
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.1%
+2.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 922 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on August 28, 2025 has been considered. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Form PTO-1449 is signed and attached hereto. Drawings The drawings filed on October 10, 2024 are accepted. Specification The specification filed October 10, 2024 is accepted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ekambaram et al. US 2020/0074049 A1 [hereinafter Ekambaram]. As per claim 1, Ekambaram teaches a program security application method comprising: (A) uploading, by a user terminal, a file to a server unit [paragraphs 0043-0044]; (B) extracting, by the server unit, app information on the basis of the file [paragraphs 0044-0046]; (C) analyzing code in the app information to separate the code into an original source code and a driving code [paragraphs 0044-0046]; (D) combining, by the server unit, a security execution code, which replaces the original source code, with the driving code [paragraphs 0047-0050 and 0053-0055]; (E) executing, by a user client, the security execution code [paragraphs 0064-0066]; and (F) executing, by the user client, the original source code [paragraphs 0064-0066]. As per claim 2, Ekambaram further teaches the method wherein step (C) comprises: (C1) extracting, by the server unit, the code from the app information [paragraphs 0044-0046]; (C2) analyzing, by the server unit, the code [paragraphs 0044-0046]; and (C3) separating, by the server unit, the code into the original source code and the driving code [paragraphs 0044-0046]. As per claim 3, Ekambaram further teaches the method wherein step (D) comprises: (D1) replacing, by the server unit, the original source code with the security execution code [paragraphs 0047-0050]; and (D2) combining, by the server unit, the original source code and the security execution code [paragraphs 0047-0050]. As per claim 4, Ekambaram further teaches the method wherein, in step (D), the original source code replaced with the security execution code is subjected to security processing through obfuscation and encryption [paragraphs 0064-0066]. As per claim 5, Ekambaram further teaches the method further comprising, between steps (E) and (F): testing the user terminal after the security execution code is executed paragraphs 0064-0066]; and decrypting the security execution code [paragraphs 0064-0066]. As per claim 6, Ekambaram further teaches the method wherein, in step (C), the original source code is a code developed by a user, and the driving code is a code which is not developed by the user [paragraphs 0043-0046]. As per claim 7, Ekambaram further teaches the method wherein, in step (B), the app information includes at least one of package name information of an app, application information, activity information, service information, and listener information [paragraphs 0043-0046]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BEEMNET W DADA whose telephone number is (571)272-3847. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Hirl can be reached at 571-272-3685. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BEEMNET W. DADA Primary Examiner Art Unit 2435 /BEEMNET W DADA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2435
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639441
RANDOMIZED OR PROGRAM-ERASE-CYCLE- DEPENDENT PROGRAM VERIFY SCHEME
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632556
Methods and Systems for Implementing Automated Controls Assessment in Computer Systems
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634326
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLOUD SERVICE SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12615153
METHODS, SYSTEMS, ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE AND APPARATUS TO PROTECT DISTRIBUTED DATA
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12613966
ATTESTATION OF A DEVICE UNDER TEST
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.7%)
3y 0m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 922 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month