Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/912,047

All-in-one gift packaging system

Non-Final OA §101§102§103§DP
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Examiner
GEHMAN, BRYON P
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Cruickshank LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
1435 granted / 1949 resolved
+3.6% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1995
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1949 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 4-6 and 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by EP 0220827. Disclosed is a greeting card system comprising a greeting card (defined package), wherein the greeting card comprises a planar greeting card portion (12 and/or 22), wherein the system further comprises a gift storage compartment (10) and wherein the gift storage compartment comprises a volume and depth for storing an item, and wherein the gift storage compartment further comprises a gift storage compartment surface (14), wherein the gift storage compartment surface comprises a window (20) covered by a transparent covering (see column 3, lines 23-25) to render a transparent window, wherein the greeting card further comprises a greeting card cover (16 or 18) coupled to the greeting card, and wherein the greeting card cover is movably coupled to the planar greeting card portion to move from an open position to a closed position adjacent the planar greeting card portion, and wherein the transparent window is visible when the greeting card cover is in the open position and when the greeting card cover is in the closed position. As to claim 4, EP 0220827 discloses a flap (outermost foldable portion of 16 or 18) located on the greeting card cover (16 or 18). As to claim 5, EP 0220827 discloses the greeting card cover (16 or 18) can be opened and closed relative to the planar greeting card portion (12) without moving the gift storage compartment (10). As to claim 6, in a disposition of the card system EP 0220827 discloses the gift storage compartment (10) coupled below the planar greeting card portion (12). As to claim 8, EP 0220827 is made of thin paper product, and accordingly of an inherently expandable nature to some degree. As to claim 9, EP 0220827 discloses the gift storage compartment (10) hingedly and releasably coupled to the planar greeting card portion (22). The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over EP 0220827 in view of either one of Pruett (8,899,413) and Pollock (6,070,719). EP 0220827 does not disclose a fastener to secure the greeting card cover to the greeting card portion. However, Pruett and Pollock each disclose a greeting card cover (6 or 11; 106) further comprising a fastener (15 or 16; 87) to secure the greeting card cover to a greeting card portion (5; 98 or 102). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the greeting card system of EP 0220827 with a fastener to secure the greeting card cover to a greeting card portion in the manner of either one of Pruett and Pollock as claimed, as such a modification would predictably provide a better closed condition of the greeting card system. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over EP 0220827 in view of Pruett (8,899,413). EP 0220827 does not disclose the greeting card comprising a hanger. However, Pruett discloses a hanger (31 or 32). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the greeting card system of EP 0220827 with a hanger in the manner of Pruett as claimed, as such a modification would predictably provide a suspension capability to the greeting card system. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-9, respectively, of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,116,200. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Prior Art not relied upon: Please refer to the additional references listed on the attached PTO-892, which, while not relied upon for the claim rejection, these references are deemed relevant to the claimed invention as a whole. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRYON P GEHMANEHMAN whose telephone number is (571) 272-4555. The examiner can normally be reached on Tuesday through Thursday from 7:30 am to 5:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, ORLANDO AVILES-BOSQUES, can be reached on (571) 270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRYON P GEHMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736 BRYON P. GEHMAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3736 BPG
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600545
TRAYS, PALLETIZED TRAY, BLANKS AND METHOD FOR FORMING A TRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595115
CIRCULAR SAW BLADE HOLDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594749
RECYCLABLE BAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595102
ARTICLE CARRIER AND BLANK THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583657
Tool Accessory Packaging and Tool Accessory Product
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.8%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1949 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month