Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/912,053

ACTIVE FEEDER-HOUSE POSITION CONTROL FOR TERRAIN FOLLOWING HEADERS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Examiner
HARCOURT, BRAD
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Deere & Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1203 granted / 1429 resolved
+32.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1444
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1429 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Drawings The drawings are objected to because Figs. 3 and 4 are in gray-scale rather than composed of solid line drawings. See 37 CFR 1.84(a)(1) and 37 CFR 1.84 (l). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Pickett et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0177449). In reference to claim 1, Pickett discloses an agricultural harvester 10 comprising: a header 16; a feeder-house 18; one or more processors 86; and memory (par. 0046) storing instructions, executable by the one or more processors 86, that, when executed by the one or more processors 86, cause the one or more processors 86 to: identify one or more topographic characteristics of upcoming terrain at a worksite based on data indicative of the one or more topographic characteristics of the upcoming terrain at the worksite (par. 0032, topographic database 76); identify a future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite based, at least, on the identified one or more topographic characteristics of the upcoming terrain at the worksite (Fig. 4, steps 126 and/or 128); identify one or more adjustments based on the identified future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite (Fig. 4, steps 130 and/or 132); and control one or more controllable subsystems of the agricultural harvester 10 based on the identified one or more adjustments (Fig. 4, step 134). In reference to claim 2, Pickett discloses an attachment frame 12 coupled to the feeder-house 18 and moveable control arms 68 coupled to the attachment frame 12 and the header 16, wherein the future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 comprises a future alignment between a reference point on the header 16 and a reference point on the attachment frame 12 (Fig. 1, any alignment between the header 16 and feeder-house 18 would result in an alignment between some arbitrary reference points on the header 16 and feeder-house 18). In reference to claim 3, Pickett discloses that the data indicative of the one or more topographic characteristics comprises one of: a map of the worksite (par. 0032); data generated during a historical operation at the worksite (par. 0032); or sensor data generated by an observation sensor system 74 on the agricultural harvester (par. 0045). In reference to claim 4, Pickett discloses that the one or more adjustments include a feeder-house 18 position adjustment (par. 0029, via lift cylinders 68), wherein the one or more controllable subsystems include one or more feeder-house position actuators 68, and wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors 86, cause the one or more processors 86 to control the one or more feeder-house position actuators 68 based on the feeder-house position adjustment (Fig. 3, steps 102-114). In reference to claim 5, Pickett discloses that the one or more adjustments include a header position adjustment (par. 0029, via tilt cylinder 69), wherein the one or more controllable subsystems include one or more header position actuators 69, and wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors 86, cause the one or more processors 86 to control the one or more header position actuators 69 based on the header position adjustment (Fig. 4, steps 122-134). In reference to claim 6, Pickett discloses that the one or more adjustments include a feeder-house position adjustment and a header position adjustment (par. 0029), wherein the one or more controllable subsystems include one or more feeder-house position actuators 68 and one or more header position actuators 69 (Fig. 1), and wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors 86, cause the one or more processors 86 to control the one or more feeder-house position actuators 68 based on the feeder-house position adjustment and to control the one or more header position actuators 69 based on the header position adjustment (Figs. 3 and 4). In reference to claim 7, Pickett discloses that the one or more adjustments include an alignment adjustment that indicates an adjusted target alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18, wherein the one or more controllable subsystems include one or more actuators 69 (par. 0029) operable to adjust alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18, and wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors 86, cause the one or more processors 86 to control the one or more actuators 69 based on the alignment adjustment (Fig. 4). In reference to claim 8, Pickett discloses that the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors 86, further cause the one or more processors 86 to: compare the identified future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite to a target alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 (Fig. 4, steps 124-128); and identify the one or more adjustments based on the comparison between the identified future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite and the target alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 (Fig. 4, steps 130 and 132). In reference to claim 9, Pickett discloses a computer implemented method of controlling an agricultural harvester 10, the computer implemented method comprising: obtaining data relative to upcoming terrain at a worksite (par. 0032, within database 76); identifying one or more topographic characteristics of upcoming terrain at the worksite based on the data (Fig. 4, step 126); identifying a future alignment between a header 16 of the agricultural harvester 10 and a feeder-house 18 of the agricultural harvester 10 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite based, at least, on the identified one or more topographic characteristics of the upcoming terrain at the worksite (Fig. 4, steps 126 and 128); identifying one or more adjustments based on the identified future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite (Fig. 4, steps 130 and 132) ; and controlling one or more controllable subsystems 69 of the agricultural harvester 10 based on the identified one or more adjustments (Fig. 4, step 134). In reference to claim 10, Pickett discloses that identifying the future alignment comprises identifying a future alignment between a reference point corresponding to the header 16 and a reference point corresponding to the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite based, at least, on the identified one or more topographic characteristics of the upcoming terrain at the worksite (Fig. 1, any identified alignment between the header 16 and feeder-house 18 would result in an identified alignment between arbitrary reference points on the header 16 and feeder-house 18). In reference to claim 11, Pickett discloses that obtaining data relative to the upcoming terrain at the worksite comprises obtaining a map of the worksite (par. 0032); obtaining data generated during a historical operation at the worksite (par. 0032); or obtaining sensor data generated by an observation sensor system 45 on the agricultural harvester 10 (par. 0045). In reference to claim 12, Pickett discloses that identifying the one or more adjustments includes identifying a feeder-house position adjustment (Fig. 3, step 110), wherein controlling one or more controllable subsystems includes controlling one or more feeder-house position actuators 68 (par. 0029) based on the identified feeder-house position adjustment (Fig. 4, step 114). In reference to claim 13, Pickett discloses that identifying the one or more adjustments includes identifying a header position adjustment (Fig. 4, steps 130 and 132), wherein controlling one or more controllable subsystems includes controlling one or more header position actuators 69 (par. 0029) based on the identified header position adjustment (Fig. 4, step 134). In reference to claim 14, Pickett discloses that identifying the one or more adjustments includes identifying an alignment adjustment that indicates an adjusted target alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 (Fig. 4, steps 130 and 132), wherein controlling one or more controllable subsystems includes controlling one or more actuators 69 (par. 0029) to adjust alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 based on the alignment adjustment (Fig. 4, step 134). In reference to claim 15, Pickett discloses comparing the identified future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite to a target alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 (Fig. 4, steps 124-128); and wherein identifying the one or more adjustments comprises identifying the one or more adjustments based on the comparison between the identified future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite and the target alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 (Fig. 4, steps 130 and 132). In reference to claim 16, Pickett discloses an agricultural system comprising: one or more processors 86; and memory (par. 0046) storing instructions, executable by the one or more processors 86, that, when executed by the one or more processors 86, cause the one or more processors to: identify one or more topographic characteristics of upcoming terrain at a worksite based on data indicative of the one or more topographic characteristics of the upcoming terrain at the worksite (par. 0032, topographic database 76); identify a future alignment between a header 16 of an agricultural harvester 10 and a feeder-house 18 of the agricultural harvester 10 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite based, at least, on the identified one or more topographic characteristics of the upcoming terrain at the worksite (Fig. 4, steps 126 and/or 128); identify one or more adjustments based on the identified future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite (Fig. 4, steps 130 and 132); and control one or more controllable subsystems of the agricultural harvester based on the identified one or more adjustments (Fig. 4, step 134). In reference to claim 17, Pickett discloses that the one or more adjustments include a feeder-house position adjustment (Fig. 3), wherein the one or more controllable subsystems include one or more feeder-house position actuators 68 (par. 0029), and wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors 86, cause the one or more processors 86 to control the one or more feeder-house position actuators 68 based on the feeder-house position adjustment (Fig. 3, step 114). In reference to claim 18, Pickett discloses that the one or more alignment adjustments include a header position adjustment (Fig. 4), wherein the one or more controllable subsystems include one or more header position actuators 69 (par. 0029), and wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors 86, cause the one or more processors 86 to control the one or more header position actuators 69 based on the header position adjustment (Fig. 4, step 134). In reference to claim 19, Pickett discloses that the one or more adjustments include an alignment adjustment that indicates an adjusted target alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 (Fig. 4, steps 130 and 132), wherein the one or more controllable subsystems include one or more actuators 69 operable to adjust alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18, and wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors 86, cause the one or more processors 86 to control the one or more actuators 69 based on the alignment adjustment (fig. 4, step 134). In reference to claim 20, Pickett discloses that the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors 86, further cause the one or more processors 86 to: compare the identified future alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite to a target alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 (Fig. 4, steps 124-128); and identify the one or more adjustments based on the comparison between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 at the upcoming terrain at the worksite and the target alignment between the header 16 and the feeder-house 18 (Fig. 4, steps 130 and 132). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Schlipf (US Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0000034) discloses controlling the alignment between a header 22 and a feeder-house 34 (Figs. 4-6); Vendeven et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2021/0100155) discloses controlling a header 1100 relative to a feeder-house 1102 (Figs. 11 and 12); Vandike et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2022/0110237) discloses a combine harvester 100 with a feeder-house 106 and header 102 controlled by an actuator 107 (Fig. 1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRAD HARCOURT whose telephone number is (571)272-7303. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at (571)272-4137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRAD HARCOURT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3674 7/09/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702091
CHEMICAL AGENT APPLICATION SYSTEM THAT IS REMOVABLY ATTACHABLE TO A LAWN MOWING TRACTOR
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12692767
DOWNHOLE POWER AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM(S) AND METHOD(S) OF USING SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12677743
MOWER FOLDING FLAIL CURTAIN
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680436
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING WITH MODULATING INJECTION FLOW RATE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669023
REAL TIME FLOW RATE AND RHEOLOGY MEASUREMENT
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+5.2%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1429 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month