Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/912,075

PACKAGE FILM AND PACKAGE MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Priority
Oct 10, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0134401
Examiner
SIMONE, CATHERINE A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Microworks Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
708 granted / 966 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1001
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§102
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 966 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 8/10/2026 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2), which requires a legible copy of each cited foreign patent document; each non-patent literature publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; and all other information or that portion which caused it to be listed. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein for JP2016-020085A has not been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al. (WO2023/080498A1) in view of Kim et al. (WO2023/068594A1). Regarding claim 1, Han discloses a package film comprising a laminate comprising a first layer, and a second layer disposed on the first layer, wherein the first layer comprises a polyester resin, wherein the second layer comprises a vinyl alcohol-based copolymer resin (BVOH or EVOH), and wherein the package film has an oxygen permeability of 10 cc/(m2∙day∙atm) or less at 23oC (see abstract; paragraph [0170]). Han fails to disclose the polyester resin comprising a diol residue and a dicarboxylic acid residue. Kim teaches a barrier film for packaging material that comprises polyester resin and the polyester resin comprises a diol residue and a dicarboxylic acid residue for the purpose of forming an eco-friendly biodegradable packaging material that has excellent heat resistance (abstract). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the polyester resin in Han to be a polyester resin comprising a diol residue and a dicarboxylic acid residue as suggested by Kim in order to form an eco-friendly biodegradable packaging material that provides excellent heat resistance. Regarding claim 2, the packaging film of Han, as modified by Kim, inherently has a moisture permeability of 50 g/(m2∙day) or less, since the materials of the packaging film are substantially identical to that of the claimed packaging film. Regarding claim 3, Han discloses the vinyl alcohol-based copolymer resin is a butenediol vinyl alcohol copolymer resin or an ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer resin (paragraphs [0035-0037]). Regarding claim 4, the vinyl alcohol-based copolymer resin of Han inherently has a pyrolysis temperature of 210oC to 230oC, since the vinyl alcohol-based copolymer resin is either EVOH or BVOH which is substantially identical to that of the claimed vinyl alcohol-based copolymer resin. Regarding claim 5, Han discloses the first layer is located in at least one of the two outermost layers of the laminate (paragraph [0157]). Regarding claim 6, Han discloses the laminate having a light transmittance of 80% or more in the visible light of wavelengths 380 nm to 780 nm (paragraph [0176]). Regarding claim 7, Han discloses the laminate has a haze of 30% or less (paragraph [0173]). Regarding claim 8, Han discloses the laminate comprising 3 to 225 alternating layers of the first layer and the second layer (paragraphs [0149-0151]). Regarding claim 10, Han discloses a packaging material for packaging a food product comprising the package film of claim 1 (paragraph [0228]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 9 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Han fails to teach or reasonably suggest the distinct feature of the package film has a maximum thickness deviation (MTD200) of 10 µm or less, as represented by the equation recited in claim 9. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CATHERINE A SIMONE whose telephone number is (571)272-1501. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frank Vineis can be reached at 571-270-1547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CATHERINE A. SIMONE Examiner Art Unit 1781 /Catherine A. Simone/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747535
Sanitary Tissue Product Rolls
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12735938
VACUUM INSULATED PANEL WITH EVACUATION TUBE MOUNTING STRUCTURE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729485
FLAME-PROOF CORRUGATED PAPERBOARD AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722361
COVER GLASS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING GLASS SHEET FOR COVER GLASS
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722462
SEALING LIP HAVING IMPROVED LOAD LOSS AND COMPRESSION SET PROPERTIES
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+22.8%)
2y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 966 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month