Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/912,205

MESSAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Priority
Apr 11, 2022 — CN 202210375326.7 +1 more
Examiner
LEE, GIL H
Art Unit
2446
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
362 granted / 436 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
453
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
72.1%
+32.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 436 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to the original application filed on 10/10/2024. Claims 1-20 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1 (and similarly claims 16 and 20), the claim recites “recall mode”, which renders the claim indefinite. It is unclear whether the term “recall” is related to taking back messages (e.g., deleting sent message, undo option) or remembering past messages (e.g., auto-complete, auto-correct, phrase suggestion). Moreover, it is indefinite as to whether “the target message recall mode comprises: a batch recall mode, a partial recall mode, or a partial user recall mode” is intended to show that the updating is based on a selection of various recall modes or simply state what the name of the recall mode is (due to alternative language), which makes the metes and bounds of the claim unclear. Examiner recommends Applicant to consider providing further context and details by clarifying the term “recall”, the distinctions between the listed recall modes, and the exact function of the recall mode, to show exactly what the updating entails in relation to the recall mode in order to clearly overcome the current rejection and advance prosecution without ambiguity. Regarding claims 2-15 and 17-19, which claim dependency from claims 1 and 16, they are rejected for the same reasons as set forth in the rejection of claims 1 and 16 above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: Donohue et al. (US 2017/0034106 A1: Automated Message Recall From a Sender’s Device), Sivaraman et al. (US 2014/0189532 A1: Editing Text-Based Communications), VanderBaan et al. (US 2006/0229883 A1: Methods and Apparatus for Providing Push to Talk Text Data), and Eren et al. (US 2012/0272161 A1: Caching Message Fragments During Real-Time Messaging Conversations). In the case of amendments, applicant is respectfully requested to indicate the portion(s) of the specification which dictate(s) the structure relied on for proper interpretation and support, for ascertaining the metes and bounds of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GIL H. LEE whose telephone number is 571-272-3408. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri: 9am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian J. Gillis can be reached on 571-272-7952. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GIL H. LEE/ Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2446
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640240
SINGLE SIGN-ON CLINICAL TRIAL MANAGEMENT PLATFORM
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12639426
A Method of Validating Defense Mechanism of an AI System
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634342
PHISHING SITE IDENTIFICATION AND SECURITY REMEDY
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627710
NETWORK SECURITY PROTECTION METHOD AND PROTECTION DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626161
DYNAMIC INFERENCING AT AN IOT EDGE
1y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.0%)
2y 3m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 436 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month