Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/912,704

MODULAR POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Examiner
CHOWDHURI, SWARNA N
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
258 granted / 340 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
371
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.6%
+19.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 340 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
4DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 5 is objected to because of the following informalities: last line of claim 5 reads the limitation “the component”, however it should be “the power system component”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-11, 14, 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 2002/0085325 (Suzui). Regarding claim 1, Suzui teaches a method for determining when a connection of a power system to a grid has been disconnected (method for determining when a connection of a power system to a grid shown in Fig. 4 as system 4 has been disconnected) [0003-0004] comprising: detecting current values (Fig. 1 shows current detection type ground fault sensor 89 detecting current values) [0042]; summing the current values (ground fault sensor 89 detects the sum of currents) [0042]; if the sum of current values exceeds a predefined threshold (sum of current values exceeding zero i.e. predefined threshold) [0066-0067]; detecting a fault (detecting fault based on the current value detected by ground fault sensor 89) [0067-68]; and turning off the power system (power system is disconnected when there is a fault i.e. abnormal connection) [0070]. Regarding claim 2, Suzui teaches wherein shutting off the power system comprising turning off an inverter (inverter 9 is disconnected from system 4) [0060]. Regarding claim 3, Suzui teaches wherein shutting off the power system comprising shutting off at least one component connected to the grid (shutting off the power system comprising shutting off at least one component connected to system 4 i.e. grid) [0060, 0081]. Regarding claim 4, Suzui teaches wherein shutting off the power system comprising opening a relay (Fig. 4 shows switch 522 to be mechanical switch such as relay) [0081]. Regarding claim 5, Suzui teaches a method for determining a fault condition in a power system component (method for determining a fault condition of a power system to a grid shown in Fig. 4) [0003-0004], comprising: detecting current values of a sensor (Fig. 1 shows current detection type ground fault sensor 89 detecting current values) [0042]; summing the current values (ground fault sensor 89 detects the sum of currents) [0042]; reaching a threshold sum of current values (sum of current values exceeding zero i.e. predefined threshold) [0066-0067]; and shutting off the component (shutting off the component when there is a fault i.e. abnormal connection) [0070]. Regarding claim 6, Suzui teaches wherein shutting off the power system comprising turning off an inverter (inverter 9 is disconnected from system 4) [0060]. Regarding claim 7, Suzui teaches wherein shutting off the power system comprising shutting off at least one component connected to the grid (shutting off the power system comprising shutting off at least one component connected to system 4 i.e. grid) [0060, 0081]. Regarding claim 8, Suzui teaches wherein shutting off the power system comprising opening a relay (Fig. 4 shows switch 522 to be mechanical switch such as relay) [0060, 0081]. Regarding claim 9, Suzui teaches wherein shutting off the power system comprising at least two of the following actions, turning off an inverter, opening a relay, shutting off one component connected to the grid (Fig. 9 shows shutting off the power system method comprising disconnecting inverter 9 from system 4, opening switch 522) [0075-79]. Regarding claim 10, Suzui teaches wherein the predefined threshold is defined by the user [0009]. Regarding claim 11, Suzui teaches wherein the components in the power system include at least one of the following: motor driven permanent generator, photovoltaic array, fuel-cell system, battery, invertor supplying AC power, Buck/boost converter supplying DC power (Fig. 1 shows solar battery from photovoltage array and inverter supplying AC power) [0030]. Regarding claim 14, Suzui teaches wherein the components includes a resistor to dissipate electrical energy (Fig. 4 shows line 12 which includes a resistor to dissipate electrical energy) [0052]. Regarding claim 16, Suzui teaches wherein each component comprises a current sensor (Fig. 4 shows ground fault current sensor 89 to be sensing current) [0054]. Regarding claim 17, Suzui teaches wherein the steps of detecting current values, summing current values and comparing the summed current values to a threshold are repeated at a predetermined time frames or continuously [0011, 0042]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 12-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2002/0085325 (Suzui) in view of US 2005/0047035 (Vallinmaki). Regarding claim 12, Suzui teaches wherein the components include a motor/generator [0030]. However, Suzui does not teach generator to be three-phase. However, Vallinmaki teaches generator to be three-phase [0012]. It would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have generator to be three-phase in order to have a more compact size of the system having the same output rating. Regarding claim 13, Suzui teaches wherein the components include a three-phase inverter supplying AC power [0054]. However, Suzui does not teach the inverter being three-phase. However, Vallinmaki teaches the inverter being three-phase [0010]. It would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the inverter being three-phase in order to have a more compact size of the system having the same output rating. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2002/0085325 (Suzui) in view of US 2004/0008010 (Ebrahim). Regarding claim 15, Suzui teaches wherein the resistor [0052]. However, Suzui does not teach resistor disposed in a water heater. However, Ebrahim teaches resistor disposed in a water heater [0097]. It would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have resistor disposed in a water heater in order to allow a portion of the resistor energy loss to be recovered and added to the energy recovered. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SWARNA N CHOWDHURI whose telephone number is (571)431-0696. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at 571-272-7496. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SWARNA N. CHOWDHURI Examiner Art Unit 2836 /S.N.C/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 /REXFORD N BARNIE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603519
EMERGENCY LIGHTING SYSTEM WITH BATTERY IDENTIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594839
ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE LOW-VOLTAGE (LV) BUS VOLTAGE CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589674
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587028
Battery Pack, Battery Pack System and Power Tool
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570150
POWER DISTRIBUTION DEVICE AND TRANSPORTATION DEVICE HAVING POWER DISTRIBUTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+21.9%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 340 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month