Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/912,856

DISPLAY METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Apr 15, 2022 — CN 202210395816.3 +1 more
Examiner
BURKE, TIONNA M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
238 granted / 442 resolved
-6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 4m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
489
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§103
60.8%
+20.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 442 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/30/24 and 6/18/25 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jeong et al., United States Patent Publication 2017/014504 (hereinafter “Jeong”). Claim 1: Jeong discloses: A display method, wherein the display method comprises: generating, by an electronic device, a first page based on first page data corresponding to a to-be-displayed application interface, wherein the first page data comprises original element data, original layout data, and an original rendering size (see paragraph [0050] and [0056]). Jeong teaches generating a first page having a first display size and original element with the original layout; in response to determining that a size of a display of the electronic device does not match the original rendering size, generating, by the electronic device, a second page after proportionally zooming in or out a size of the first page, the original element data, and the original layout data based on a zoom-in/out ratio, wherein the zoom-in/out ratio is determined based on the size of the display and the original rendering size (see paragraph [0206]). Jeong teaches in response to having a change and the rendering size does not match, providing a zoom to the content to be displayed correctly, generating, by the electronic device, third page data based on the size of the display, a preset page rearrangement rule, and second page data comprised in the second page (see paragraphs [0010]-[0014], [0206] and [0207]). Jeong teaches generating a new page based on a preset size and the changing of the size of the screen; generating, by the electronic device, a third page based on the third page data; and displaying, by the electronic device, the third page on the display (see paragraphs [0014] and [0015]). Jeon teaches generating another display according to the changed sizes on the display. Claim 2: Jeong discloses: wherein a value of the original rendering size is a preset value (see paragraph [0056]). Jeong teaches a first preset size. Claim 3: Jeong discloses: wherein the display method further comprises: parsing preset code in a process of rendering the first page to obtain the preset value; and setting the value of the original rendering size to the preset value (see paragraphs [0056], [0057] and [0098]). Jeong teaches parsing the preset code to determine the configuration for displaying the first page. Claim 4: Jeong discloses: wherein after the displaying, by the electronic device, the third page on the display, the display method further comprises: determining, by the electronic device, that the size of the display changes from a first size to a second size, wherein the second size is greater than the first size (see paragraph [0205]-[0208]). Jeong teaches determining to the change to the display during the unrolling; generating, by the electronic device, a fourth page after proportionally zooming in, based on a zoom-in ratio, a size of the third page and the third page data comprised in the third page, wherein the zoom-in ratio is determined based on the second size and the first size (see paragraphs [0206]-[0208). Jeong teaches generating a new page data based on the increased size; generating, by the electronic device, fifth page data based on the second size, the preset page rearrangement rule, and fourth page data comprised in the fourth page (see paragraphs [0206]-[0208]). Jeong teaches generating layout data based on the rules and rendering based on the new size; generating, by the electronic device, a fifth page based on the fifth page data; and displaying, by the electronic device, the fifth page on the display (see paragraphs [0206]-[0209]). Jeong teaches generating and displaying new page data base on the new size information and displaying the new page. Claim 5: Jeong discloses: wherein the display of the electronic device is a foldable display (see paragraph [0051]). Jeong teaches a rollable display; and the determining, by the electronic device, that the size of the display changes from a first size to a second size comprises: determining, by the electronic device, that the display changes from a folded state to an expanded state, wherein a size of the display in the folded state is the first size, a size of the display in the expanded state is the second size, and the third page is a page displayed by the electronic device when the display is in the folded state (see paragraph [0052]). Jeong teaches determining the roll/unrolling of the display increases/decreases the size of the display. Claim 6: Jeong discloses: wherein after the displaying, by the electronic device, the third page on the display, the display method further comprises: determining, by the electronic device, that the size of the display changes from a first size to a second size, wherein the second size is less than the first size (see paragraph [00206]). Jeong teaches if the display area decreases according to a rolling interaction, the processor may provide the zoom-out function of zooming out the image displayed in the display area; determining, by the electronic device, the second page corresponding to the third page (see paragraph [0119]). Jeong teaches determining the second pages based on the rolling of the display; generating, by the electronic device, a fourth page after proportionally zooming out the second page and the second page data based on a zoom-out ratio, wherein the zoom-out ratio is determined based on the second size and the first size (see paragraph [0119]. [0205]-[0208]). Jeon teaches generating a new page based on the zooming out from the original and previous sizes; and displaying, by the electronic device, the fourth page on the display (see paragraphs [0206]-[0209]). Jeong teaches generating and displaying new page data base on the new size information and displaying the new page, Claim 7: Jeong discloses: the determining, by the electronic device, that the size of the display changes from a first size to a second size comprises: determining, by the electronic device, that the display changes from an expanded state to a folded state, wherein a size of the display in the expanded state is the first size, a size of the display in the folded state is the second size, and the third page is a page displayed by the electronic device when the display is in the expanded state (see paragraphs [0052] and [0200]-[0203]). Jeong teaches determining that the display changes from unrolled to rolled out state and the display size increases and the display is displayed in the unrolled/expanded state. Claim 8: Jeong discloses: wherein at least one of the following factors exists: the zoom-in/out ratio is a ratio of a width of the display to a width in the original rendering size; or the zoom-in/out ratio is a ratio of a height of the display to a height in the original rendering size (see paragraph [0205] and [0206]). Jeong teaches the zooming in/out changes the width/height of the rollable display. Claim 9: Jeong discloses: wherein that a size of a display of the electronic device does not match the original rendering size comprises at least one of the following: a width of the display of the electronic device is greater than a width in the original rendering size; or a height of the display of the electronic device is greater than a height in the original rendering size (see paragraph [0052]). Jeon teaches the height/width of the display change due to the unrolling of the display. Claims 10-18: Although Claims 10-18 are electronic device claims, they are interpreted and rejected for the same reasons as the method of Claims 1-9, respectively. Claims 19-20: Although Claims 19-20 are non-transitory computer readable storage medium claims, they are interpreted and rejected for the same as the method of Claims 1, 4, respectively. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIONNA M BURKE whose telephone number is (571)270-7259. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8a-4p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Hong can be reached at (571)272-4124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIONNA M BURKE/Examiner, Art Unit 2178 7/11/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699962
DIGITAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DUAL MODE EDITING IN COLLABORATIVE DOCUMENTS ENABLING PRIVATE CHANGES IN COLLABORATIVE WORK SYSTEMS
4y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12688324
DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS FOR WEBFORM CRAWLING TO MAP PROCESSING ACTIVITIES AND RELATED METHODS
5y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682213
IDENTIFYING MICROORGANISMS USING THREE-DIMENSIONAL QUANTITATIVE PHASE IMAGING
4y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12639509
EFFICIENT COPY PASTE IN A COLLABORATIVE SPREADSHEET
4y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12626054
USER INTERFACE(S) RELATED TO SYNTHESIZING PROGRAMS IN A SPREADSHEET PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
5y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+20.3%)
4y 4m (~2y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 442 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month