Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/913,630

REFLECTION FILM, LAMINATE, WINDSHIELD GLASS, AND IMAGE DISPLAY SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Apr 15, 2022 — JP 2022-067813 +3 more
Examiner
DEAN, RAY ALEXANDER
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
105 granted / 133 resolved
+10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
189
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
57.0%
+17.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 133 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, 11, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tasaka (US 20140192286 A1). Re Claim 1, Tasaka discloses on Fig. 1 and 4, a reflection film comprising, in the following order: a hardcoat layer (glass substitute resin used in place of glass plates 4 and 4’, can contain hard coating layers) [Par 3, 235 and 359]; a reflective layer (Fig. 4: wavelength selective layers 16a-16 of liquid crystal layer 1) [Par 197] reflecting light in a wavelength-selective manner; and a heat seal layer (Fig 1 and 4: interlayer 3 and 3’ are thermal bonded to liqud crystal layer 1) [Par 248-249] laminated (“lamination”) [Par 247] on one side of the reflective layer (Fig. 4: wavelength selective layers 16a-16 of liquid crystal layer 1) [Par 197], wherein the reflective layer (Fig. 4: wavelength selective layers 16a-16 of liquid crystal layer 1) [Par 197] is formed of a composition containing a polymerizable liquid crystal compound (cholesteric liquid crystal 1 is made of a polymerizable group and polymerization initiator, and optically active compound) [Par 26-27 and 123], and the heat seal layer (Fig 1 and 4: interlayer 3 and 3’ are thermal bonded to liquid crystal layer 1) [Par 248-249] contains a thermoplastic resin (thermoplastic resin between cholesteric liquid crystal phase and second interlayer)[Par 211-212] or an elastomer. Re Claim 5, Tasaka discloses on Fig. 3, a reflection film comprising, in the following order: a hardcoat layer (glass substitute resin used in place of glass plates 4 and 4’, can contain hard coating layers) [Par 3, 235 and 359]; a reflective layer (Fig. 4: wavelength selective layers 16a-16 of liquid crystal layer 1) [Par 197] reflecting light in a wavelength-selective manner; a polarization conversion layer (reflection layers 15a-15b circularly polarize light) [Par 197]; and a heat seal layer (Fig 1 and 4: interlayer 3 and 3’ are thermal bonded to liquid crystal layer 1) [Par 248-249] laminated on one side of the polarization conversion layer, wherein the polarization conversion layer (15a-15b) is formed of a composition containing a polymerizable liquid crystal compound (Fig. 4: layers 15a-15b are part of liquid crystal layer 1 which is polymerizable, and optically active compound) [Par 27 and 123], and the heat seal layer (Fig 1 and 4: interlayer 3 and 3’ are thermal bonded to liqud crystal layer 1) [Par 248-249] contains a thermoplastic resin (thermoplastic resin between cholesteric liquid crystal phase and second interlayer)[Par 211-212] or an elastomer. Re Claim 11, Tasaka discloses, on Fig. 1, a windshield glass (windshield for automobiles) [Par 11] comprising: a glass plate (glass sheets 4 and 4’); and the reflection film according to claim 1 (Layers 3 through 3’), wherein the glass plate and the reflection film (liquid crystal layer 1) are bonded to each other through the heat seal layer (Fig 1 and 4: interlayer 3 and 3’ are thermal bonded to liquid crystal layer 1, and the glass sheet is bonded to the laminate, which includes the inter layer 3 and 3’ at its edges) [Par 248-249 and 280]. Re claim 12, Tasaka discloses, an image display system (the film can be used in a liquid crystal display device)[Par 223] comprising: the windshield glass according to claim 11; and a projector irradiating a projection image light onto the windshield glass on a side of the reflection film (this would be inherently taught because liquid crystal display device would require a back light or image light to project onto and illuminate the display)[Par 223]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-4, and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tasaka. Re Claim 2, Tasaka discloses, the reflection film according to claim 1. But Tasaka does not explicitly disclose, wherein the heat seal layer is a layer formed of a composition containing a polymerization initiator. However, Tasaka does teach a polymer based heat seal layer (Fig 1 and 4: interlayer 3 and 3’ are thermal bonded to liquid crystal layer 1, and are made of polyvinyl acetate) [Par 241 and 248-249] and the general use of thermal polymerization initiators (“Preferably, the fixation [of the liquid crystal] is attained by polymerization of the polymerizable group introduced into the liquid-crystal molecule. The polymerization includes thermal polymerization using a thermal polymerization initiator…”) [Par 128-129], to fix in place aligned polymers [Par 128-129]. One of ordinary skill in the art would have both been capable of using a thermal polymerization initiator in the heat seal layer, and would have been motivated to so in order to better keep the cholesteric liquid crystal phase (liquid crystal 1) in contact with the first or second interlayer (“…it is desirable that the liquid-crystal film in which the cholesteric liquid-crystal phase is fixed is kept in contact with the first interlayer to be mentioned below and that the liquid-crystal film in which the cholesteric liquid-crystal phase is fixed is also kept in contact with the second interlayer…”) [Par 212]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to modify the system of Tasaka such that, the heat seal layer is a layer formed of a composition containing a polymerization initiator, in order to fix in place the liquid crystal to the interlayer [Par 212]. Re claim 3, modified Tasaka teaches, the reflection film according to claim 2, and Tasaka further teaches, wherein the composition further contains a polymerizable compound (first and second interlayers contain the polymer, polyvinyl acetal resin, which is polymerized from ethylene vinyl acetate) [Par 241]. Re claim 4, modified Taksaka teaches, the reflection film according to claim 3, and Tasaka further teaches, wherein the polymerizable liquid crystal compound (optically active compound in cholesteric liquid crystal layer) has an ethylenically unsaturated polymerizable group (optically active compound is an ethylenically unsaturated polymerizable group) [Par 123], and the polymerizable compound has an ethylene polymerizable group (interlayers 3 and 3’ contain polymerizable ethylene vinyl acetate) [Par 241]. But Tasaka does not explicitly disclose, wherein the ethylene polymerizable group in the polymerizable compound is unsaturated. However, Tasaka teaches the polymerizable compound has an ethylene based polymerizable group (interlayers 3 and 3’ contain polymerizable ethylene vinyl acetate) [Par 241], and teaches the general use of ethylenically unsaturated polymerizable groups (optically active compound is an ethylenically unsaturated polymerizable group) [Par 123]. One of ordinary skill in the art would both be capable of and be motivated to use an unsaturated ethylene based polymerizable group in order to prevent precipitation of the resulting polymer layer, reduce haze, or broaden reflection width [Par 27]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to modify the system of Tasaka, such that the ethylene polymerizable group in the polymerizable compound is unsaturated, in order to prevent precipitation of the resulting polymer layer, reduce haze, or broaden reflection width [Par 27]. Re Claim 6, Tasaka discloses, the reflection film according to claim 5. But Tasaka does not explicitly disclose, wherein the heat seal layer is a layer formed of a composition containing a polymerization initiator. However, Tasaka does teach a polymer based heat seal layer (Fig 1 and 4: interlayer 3 and 3’ are thermal bonded to liquid crystal layer 1, and are made of polyvinyl acetate) [Par 241 and 248-249] and the general use of thermal polymerization initiators (“Preferably, the fixation [of the liquid crystal] is attained by polymerization of the polymerizable group introduced into the liquid-crystal molecule. The polymerization includes thermal polymerization using a thermal polymerization initiator…”) [Par 128-129], to fix in place aligned polymers [Par 128-129]. One of ordinary skill in the art would have both been capable of using a thermal polymerization initiator in the heat seal layer, and would have been motivated to so in order to better keep the cholesteric liquid crystal phase (liquid crystal 1) in contact with the first or second interlayer (“…it is desirable that the liquid-crystal film in which the cholesteric liquid-crystal phase is fixed is kept in contact with the first interlayer to be mentioned below and that the liquid-crystal film in which the cholesteric liquid-crystal phase is fixed is also kept in contact with the second interlayer…”) [Par 212]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to modify the system of Tasaka such that, the heat seal layer is a layer formed of a composition containing a polymerization initiator, in order to fix in place the liquid crystal to the interlayer [Par 212]. Re claim 7, modified Tasaka teaches, the reflection film according to claim 6, and Tasaka further teaches, wherein the composition further contains a polymerizable compound (first and second interlayers contain the polymer, polyvinyl acetal resin, which is polymerized from ethylene vinyl acetate) [Par 241]. Re claim 8, modified Tasaka discloses, the reflection film according to claim 3, and Tasaka further teaches on Fig. 4, wherein a content of the polymerizable compound (ethylene vinyl acetate) [Par 214] is 5% to 80% by mass with respect to a solid content of the composition (Ethylene vinyl acetate, is “…at least 50% by mass of the resin interlayer layer”) [Par 241]. Claim(s) 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tasaka as applied to claim 3 above, and further in view of Ito (DE 112005002043 T5, see attached Espacenet Machine Translation). Re claim 9, modified Tasaks teaches, the reflection film according to claim 3. But Tasaka does not explicitly teach wherein an I/O ratio of the polymerizable compound is 0.4 or more. However, within the same field of endeavor, teaches, on Fig. 1, that it is desirable in thermoplastic polymerized resins to include wherien, an I/O ratio of the polymerizable compound is 0.4 or more (“…yielding a mixture containing inorganic fine particles and an organic polymer in a ratio of 70:30.”, Or 2.33) [Par 273]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to modify the system of Tasaka with Ito in order to improve heat resistance, as taught by Ito [Par 52 and 105]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Tasaka does not teach, wherein a moisture content of the heat seal layer at 25° C. and 60% RH is 2.0% or less. Saito (WO 2014162864 A1, See Machine Translation), teaches after production storing the film at 25 ºC and 55 % humidity, and separately teaches that the average moisture content of the film can be 1% or less. But Saito does not explicitly disclose, wherein, the moisture content of the heat seal layer, measured at 25° C. and 60% RH is 2.0% or less. The prior art neither teaches nor suggests to combine these limitations such that, wherein a moisture content of the heat seal layer at 25° C. and 60% RH is 2.0% or less. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Saito (WO 2014162864 A1) teaches a thermoplastic resin adhesive with low moisture content. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAY ALEXANDER DEAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4027. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bumsuk Won can be reached at (571)-272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAY ALEXANDER DEAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2872 /BUMSUK WON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761501
CONTACT LENS
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12743003
FINDER AND IMAGING APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12699051
MICROSCOPE FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION AND SPECIFIC ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL SUBSTANCES, AND METHOD OF ANALYSIS
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699262
MEMS ACTUATOR, MEMS ACTUATOR DRIVE METHOD, AND MEMS ACTUATOR CONTROL PROGRAM
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699287
SAFETY GLASSES
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+17.4%)
3y 1m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 133 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month