Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/913,666

METHOD FOR ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE AND DEVICE THEREFOR

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Examiner
PHAM, NAM D
Art Unit
2487
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
481 granted / 530 resolved
+32.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
564
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§103
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 530 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Summary This office action for US Patent application 18/913666 is responsive to communications filed on January 21th, 2026. Currently, claims 1-4 are pending are presented for examination while claim 3 was canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION-The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See M.P.E.P. § 2172.01. The omitted steps are: any steps for bitstream transmission in what is supposedly “a method of transmitting a bitstream’. The claim as a whole, directed substantially to a bitstream generated by an image encoding method, appears to be the latest tactic for sneaking a claim to a per se bitstream past the statutory category requirement. See In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346, 1356-57, 84 U.S.P.Q.2d 1495, 1501-03 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (encoded signal not within any of the four statutory categories of invention). It is suggested that Applicant amend claim 4E to recite a positive method step of “transmitting the bitstream to an image decoding apparatus”. Such an amendment would be a fig leaf actually big enough to cover the claim from the piercing gaze of Section 101. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2 is/are allowable New Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications form the examiner should be directed to Nam Pham, whose can be contacted by phone at (571)270-7352. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon—Thurs. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, CZEKAJ DAVID, can be reached on (571)272-7327. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) AT 866-217-9197 (too free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NAM D PHAM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Jan 21, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604031
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMBINED INTER AND INTRA PREDICTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598289
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587644
Transforms on Non-dyadic Blocks
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581058
GEOMETRIC PARTITION MODE WITH MOTION VECTOR REFINEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581056
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+1.2%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 530 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month