Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/913,801

SHIPPING COVER ASSEMBLY FOR A TRANSMISSION HOUSING

Non-Final OA §102§OTHER
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Oct 12, 2023 — DE 20 2023 105 896.5
Examiner
DIAZ, THOMAS C
Art Unit
3617
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Dana Italia S R L
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
718 granted / 1051 resolved
+16.3% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1068
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
69.7%
+29.7% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1051 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §OTHER
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4-13, 15-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wilcox et al. (USP 11859706). Regarding claim 1, Wilcox et al. discloses a shipping cover assembly for a transmission housing, comprising: a cover portion (40) having an inner side (side facing gearing seen in fig.2), and a stub shaft portion (inner portion of 40 and 25 read on a stub shaft portion) protruding from the inner side of the cover portion, the stub shaft portion configured to receive a gear thereon (the portion is capable of this as is evident in fig.2). Regarding claim 4, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 1, wherein the stub shaft portion forms a receptacle (see annotated figure below) for detachably receiving a fastening member therein. PNG media_image1.png 684 733 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 1, further comprising a sealing member disposed on the inner side of the cover portion (see annotated figure above). Regarding claim 6, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 5, wherein the sealing member extends circumferentially around the cover portion (it’s an o-ring and thus extends circumferentially). Regarding claim 7, in certain circumstances where appropriate, an examiner may take official notice of facts not in the record or rely on "common knowledge" in making a rejection. See MPEP § 2144.03. Official notice unsupported by documentary evidence should only be taken by the examiner where the facts asserted to be well-known, or to be common knowledge in the art are capable of instant and unquestionable demonstration as being well-known. In re Ahlert, 424 F.2d 1088, 1091, 165 USPQ 418, 420 (CCPA 1970). Here, the Examiner takes official notice that the attachment or formation of the seal on the cover is instantly and unquestionably well-known and common knowledge in the art. As such, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify how the seal is attached/formed, in Wilcox, so as to be moulded thereon or glued as such combination of elements are instantly and unquestionably well-known and common knowledge in the art. Regarding claim 8, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 1, wherein the cover portion comprises a flange portion (see annotated figure above). Regarding claim 9, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 8, wherein a sealing member is disposed on the inner side of the flange portion of the cover portion (seen in fig.2; the placement is considered to be on an inner side of the flange portion). Regarding claim 10, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 8, wherein the cover portion includes a fitting portion configured to be received in an opening of the transmission housing, wherein the flange portion protrudes outwardly from the fitting portion at a right angle (evident in annotated figure 2 above). Regarding claim 11, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 10, wherein the cover portion includes a tapered portion (area at the designation 40 can read on a tapered portion) connecting the stub shaft portion to the fitting portion. Regarding claim 12, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 1, wherein the cover portion features a plurality of through holes (holes for fasteners 42 seen in fig.3) for receiving connecting members configured to connect the cover portion to the transmission housing. Regarding claim 13, Wilcox et al. discloses a shipping assembly, comprising: a transmission housing (10) forming an open cavity (seen in fig.2 or 3), a shipping cover assembly, comprising: a cover portion (fig.2, 40) connected to the transmission housing and closing the open cavity of the transmission housing, an inner side of the cover portion facing the transmission housing, and a stub shaft portion (inner portion along with 25 read on a stub shaft portion) protruding from the inner side of the cover portion and into the open cavity of the transmission housing (seen in fig.2), and a gear (seen in annotated fig.2 above) received on the stub shaft portion of the shipping cover assembly. Regarding claim 15, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping assembly of claim 13, further comprising a fastening member (elements which are designed to engage 28 or 29 can read on this) detachably received in a receptacle (either 28 or 29 can read on this) formed by the stub shaft portion for limiting movement of the gear on the stub shaft portion (given BRI the fastening members as mentioned above are capable of providing this functionality. Furthermore, this functionality is very broad and is not limited to the structure Applicant’s disclose, which is a fastener that fixedly engages the gear to the stub shaft through the receptacle in the stub shaft). Regarding claim 16, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping assembly of claim 13, wherein the shipping cover assembly further includes a sealing member disposed on the inner side of the cover portion and in sealing contact with a sealing face of the transmission housing (see annotated fig.2 above). Regarding claim 17, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping assembly of claim 16, wherein the sealing member extends circumferentially around the cover portion, and the sealing face of the transmission housing extends circumferentially around an opening of the open cavity of the transmission housing (it’s an o-ring and thus extends circumferentially). Regarding claim 18, see rejection of claim 7 above. Regarding claim 19, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping assembly of claim 16, wherein the cover portion comprises a flange portion (see annotated fig.2 above) and the sealing member is disposed on the inner side of the flange portion of the cover portion (seen in fig.2; the placement is considered to be on an inner side of the flange portion). . Regarding claim 20, Wilcox et al. discloses the shipping assembly of claim 17, wherein the cover portion of the shipping cover assembly includes a fitting portion received in the opening of the open cavity of the transmission housing in a form-fit, wherein a flange portion of the cover portion protrudes outwardly from the fitting portion at a right angle, the flange portion of the cover portion thereby forming a mechanical stop which limits movement of the cover portion relative to the transmission housing (seen in annotated figure 2 above). Claim(s) 1-3, 13, 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Pietras (USP 8783133). Regarding claim 1, Pietras discloses a shipping cover assembly for a transmission housing, comprising: a cover portion (10 which is a combination of 32, 50, and 34) having an inner side (area formed so as to protrude into the gear as seen in fig.1), and a stub shaft portion (portion 36 as seen in fig.1 which protrudes into the gear) protruding from the inner side of the cover portion, the stub shaft portion configured to receive a gear thereon (the portion is capable of this as is evident in fig.1). Regarding claim 2, Pietras discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 1, wherein the cover portion and the stub shaft portion are formed in one piece (all of 10 is one piece; col.3, lines 51-52). Regarding claim 3, Pietras discloses the shipping cover assembly of claim 1, wherein one or both of the cover portion and the stub shaft portion are made of a plastic material (col.3, lines 51-52). Regarding claim 13, Pietras discloses a shipping assembly, comprising: a transmission housing (16) forming an open cavity (seen in fig.1), a shipping cover assembly, comprising: a cover portion (10 which is a combination of 32, 50, and 34) connected to the transmission housing and closing the open cavity of the transmission housing, an inner side of the cover portion facing the transmission housing (area formed so as to protrude into the gear as seen in fig.1), and a stub shaft portion (portion 36 as seen in fig.1 which protrudes into the gear) protruding from the inner side of the cover portion and into the open cavity of the transmission housing (seen in fig.1), and a gear (seen in fig.1, the portion into which the stub shaft portion is introduced reads on a gear since it is part of a gear assembly) received on the stub shaft portion of the shipping cover assembly. Regarding claim 14, Pietras discloses the shipping assembly of claim 13, wherein the cover portion and the stub shaft portion of the shipping cover assembly are formed in one piece (col.3, lines 51-52). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Prior art includes other examples of shipping covers or covers that read on shipping covers. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS C DIAZ whose telephone number is (571)270-5461. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Olszewski can be reached at 571-272-2706. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS C DIAZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3617
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §OTHER (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631240
Parabolic tooth trace gear mechanism with combined tooth profile of end face circular arc and parabola
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631246
INFLATABLE MOUNTING SEAL
1y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623641
BRAKE PEDAL DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618456
Roller-Mounted Motor Vehicle Drive Unit
1y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612964
GEARED MOTOR INCLUDING AN ELECTRIC MOTOR AND A GEARBOX
1y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+18.9%)
2y 8m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1051 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month