Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 29, 2026
Application No. 18/914,383

METHOD FOR PRODUCING CULTURED MEAT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 14, 2024
Priority
Apr 15, 2022 — JP 2022-067537 +1 more
Examiner
LEE, JAE W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ajinomoto Co., Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
276 granted / 420 resolved
+5.7% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
453
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 420 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Application status Claims 1-8 are pending in this application. Priority It is acknowledged that the instant application is a CON of PCT/JP2023/015195 filed on 04/14/2023. Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) to a foreign patent application JAPAN JP2022-067537 filed on 04/15/2022. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/14/2024 and 05/28/2026 are acknowledged. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Objections to the Specification The disclosure is objected to because it contains an embedded hyperlink “http://” and/or other form of browser-executable code on paragraphs [0023] and [0146]. Applicant is required to delete the embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code. See MPEP § 608.01. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nagase et al. (WO2019/203368 A1) in view of Fiddes et al. (US Patent No. 5604293) and Stout et al. (“Simple and effective serum-free medium for sustained expansion of bovine satellite cells for cell cultured meat”, bioRxiv, publicly available since 05/29/2021, obtained from the Internet: <<https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.28.446057v1>>), obtained on 09/14/2026). The instant claims are drawn to a method of producing bovine basic fibroblast growth factor (bbFGF) for production of cultured meat, the method comprising: a step of culturing a coryneform bacterium having a gene construct for secretory expression of bbFGF to obtain a culture product containing bbFGF. Nagase et al. teach a method of producing human bFGF (hbFGF) comprising culturing Corynebacterium glutamicum having a gene construct, i.e., plasmid pPK6_T_bFGF comprising host-functional promoter + TorA signal peptide + hbFGF coding sequence, for secretory expression of hbFGF (as a fusion protein) to obtain a culture product containing hbFGF, and recovering the secreted hbFGF, without a step of purifying hbFGF, i.e., the secreted hbFGF appears in a clean supernatant thereby omitting a purification step optionally via chromatography (see para [0241]-[0250]). Nagase et al. do not teach bovine bFGF (bbFGF). Fiddes et al. teach a method of expressing bbFGF in CHO cells or in E. coli as a fusion with a signal sequence for secretory expression of bbFGF (see Examples 7-10). Fiddes et al. further teach complete DNA sequences encoding both bovine and human bFGFs with complete amino acid sequences (see Fig. 3-4, respectively), and expression vector, i.e., pkT52 vector comprising trc promoter for expression in E.coli. Stout et al. teach a method of culturing bovine satellite cells (animal cells) in medium containing FGF-2 to expand cells for cultured meat. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) prior to the effective filing date of the instant application to practice the method taught by Nagase et al. and Stout et al. while swapping the hbFGF with the bbFGF taught by Fiddes et al. A POSITA would have been motivated to practice such method because [1] putting bovine gene into the TorA expression construct taught by Nagase et al. is the obvious species-matched substitution so that secreted bbFGF can be used for culturing bovine satellite cells/myoblasts, which were standard methods for producing cultured meat as taught by Stout et al.; and [2] human and bovine bFGF are highly homologous and functionally interchangeable as mitogens. A POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success to practice such method all of the required biochemical reagents and techniques were readily available and rampantly used as evidenced by Nagase et al. Fiddes et al. and Stout et al. prior to the filing of the instant application. For the reasons provided herein, the invention as claimed is prima facie obvious over the combined teachings of the prior art. Conclusion Claims 1-8 are rejected for the reasons as stated above. Applicants must respond to the objections/rejections in this Office action to be fully responsive in prosecution. The instant Office action is non-final. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAE W LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-9949. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F between 9:00-6:00. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Manjunath Rao can be reached on (571)272-0939. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAE W LEE/ Examiner, Art Unit 1656 /MANJUNATH N RAO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1656
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 14, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734213
ANTIVIRAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735715
NOVEL PROMOTER AND USE THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735725
ALTERING TISSUE TROPISM OF ADENO-ASSOCIATED VIRUSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12703866
ENGINEERED MICROORGANISMS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698486
CASPASE-2 VARIANTS
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.0%)
3y 4m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 420 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month