Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 18/914,701

MESSAGE PREVIEW IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Oct 14, 2024
Priority
Sep 14, 2022 — CN 202211113944.0 +1 more
Examiner
MCDOWELL, JR, MAURICE L
Art Unit
2612
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
813 granted / 939 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
969
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 939 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Claims 1-20 are pending and the examiner agrees that the prior art doesn’t teach: when the first virtual character moves in the virtual environment, move the message notification graphical element with the first virtual character such that the message notification graphical element remains at the target location that is relative to the location of the first virtual character; and in response to detecting a user input directed to the message notification graphical element, while the virtual environment is output for display, switch from the output of the message notification graphical element to output of content of the received message at the target location. The examiner doesn’t agree that the 101 rejection has been overcome, because the applicant has amended claim 1 to recite: the outputting is performed by processing circuitry, however the receiving, outputting, moving and switching haven’t been amended as the outputting mentioned supra. Therefore, the examiner is maintaining the 101 rejection to claims 1-17. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because: Claim 1 is directed to a method for previewing messages in a virtual environment comprising the steps of receiving, outputting, moving and switching which are nothing more than software instructions. Software instructions are non-statutory under 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 2-17 depend from claim 1 and comprise further steps, for example claims 2 comprises the steps of canceling and displaying, therefore claims 2-17 are rejected under the same rationale as claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 18, the prior art doesn’t teach: processing circuitry configured to: output for display a plurality of virtual characters in a virtual environment, each virtual character of the plurality of virtual characters being movable in the virtual environment; receive a message associated with a first virtual character of the plurality of virtual characters; when the message associated with the first virtual character is received output for display a message notification graphical element at a target location that is based on a location of the first virtual character in the virtual environment; when the first virtual character moves in the virtual environment, move the message notification graphical element with the first virtual character such that the message notification graphical element remains at the target location that is relative to the location of the first virtual character; and in response to detecting a user input directed to the message notification graphical element, while the virtual environment is output for display, switch from the output of the message notification graphical element to output of content of the received message at the target location. Regarding claim 20, the prior art doesn’t teach: outputting for display a plurality of virtual characters in a virtual environment, each virtual character of the plurality of virtual characters being movable in the virtual environment; receiving a message associated with a first virtual character of the plurality of virtual characters; when receiving the message associated with the first virtual character outputting for display a message notification graphical element at a target location that is based on a location of the first virtual character in the virtual environment; when the first virtual character moves in the virtual environment, moving the message notification graphical element with the first virtual character such that the message notification graphical element remains at the target location that is relative to the location of the first virtual character; and in response to detecting a user input directed to the message notification graphical element, while the virtual environment is output for display, switching from outputting the message notification graphical element for display to outputting content of the received message for display at the target location. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. HARRISON (US2008/0215994A1) discloses Abstract Methods and systems for rendering an interactive virtual environment for communication is provided. The interactive virtual environment is depicted from images to be displayed on a display and the interactive virtual environment is generated by a computer program that is executed on at least one computer of a computer network system. The interactive virtual environment includes one or more virtual user avatars controlled by real-world users. The method further includes controlling a virtual user avatar to move about a virtual space and generating an interface for composing a message to be displayed as a virtual message within the virtual space. The virtual message is posted to an interactive space within the virtual space. The method further includes associating permissions to the virtual message, such that the permissions define which of the one more virtual user avatars are able to view the virtual message that is posted to the interactive space. The virtual message is one of a plurality of virtual message posted to the interactive space, and the permissions prevent viewing of the virtual message by virtual user avatars that do not have permission to view the virtual message. The permissions may be based on one of buddy lists, game familiarity relative to other real-world users, skill level of other real-world users, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the avatars can be computer controlled bots, thus not requiring a real-world user to dictate control. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAURICE L MCDOWELL, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-3707. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 2pm-10pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Said A. Broome can be reached at 571-272-2931. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAURICE L. MCDOWELL, JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 14, 2024
Application Filed
May 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Aug 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 21, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770345
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUGMENTED REALITY USING HEAD-BASED WEARABLES TO INTEREACT WITH OBJECTS
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762786
IMAGE PRODUCTION SYSTEM, IMAGE PRODUCTION METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762761
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISPLAYING VIRTUAL LANDSCAPE PICTURE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762812
DEVICES, METHODS, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR DISPLAYING A REPRESENTATION OF A USER IN AN EXTENDED REALITY ENVIRONMENT
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762784
RAY TRACING HARDWARE ACCELERATION FOR SUPPORTING MOTION BLUR AND MOVING/DEFORMING GEOMETRY
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 11m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 939 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month