Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/915,099

LEAD ORIENTATION DETECTION

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Oct 14, 2024
Priority
Aug 31, 2020 — provisional 63/072,702 +1 more
Examiner
THOMAS, MIA M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Medtronic Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
617 granted / 715 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
725
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
§103
47.4%
+7.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Preliminary Amendment This Office Action is responsive to communications filed on 10/14/2021. Claims 1-20 were previously pending in the instant application. Claims 1-20 have been canceled and claims 21-40 are now pending. Claims 21, 32 and 40 are independent. An Office Action on the merits follows here below. Priority This application discloses and claims only subject matter disclosed in prior application number 17/463,009, filed 08/31/2021, and names the inventor or at least one joint inventor named in the prior application. Accordingly, this application has been examined as a continuation. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/14/2024, 04/14/2025 and 08/25/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. 35 U.S.C. 101 requires that a claimed invention must fall within one of the four eligible categories of invention (i.e. process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter) and must not be directed to subject matter encompassing a judicially recognized exception as interpreted by the courts. MPEP 2106. The four eligible categories of invention include: (1) process which is an act, or a series of acts or steps, (2) machine which is an concrete thing, consisting of parts, or of certain devices and combination of devices, (3) manufacture which is an article produced from raw or prepared materials by giving to these materials new forms, qualities, properties, or combinations, whether by hand labor or by machinery, and (4) composition of matter which is all compositions of two or more substances and all composite articles, whether they be the results of chemical union, or of mechanical mixture, or whether they be gases, fluids, powders or solids. MPEP 2106(I). Claim 40 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as not falling within one of the four statutory categories of invention because the broadest reasonable interpretation of the instant claims in light of the specification encompasses transitory signals. But, transitory signals are not within one of the four statutory categories (i.e. non-statutory subject matter). See MPEP 2106(I). However, claims directed toward a non-transitory computer readable medium could qualify as a manufacture and make the claim patent-eligible subject matter. MPEP 2106(I). Therefore, amending the claims to recite a “non-transitory computer-readable medium” could resolve this issue. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter There are no prior art rejections in view of independent claims 21, 32 or 40 and their subsequent dependent claims. Prior art reference Lee et al. (US 20100030063 A1) discloses “… tracking an instrument relative to an anatomical structure. The system can include an elongated flexible body, which can have a proximal end and a distal end for insertion into the anatomical structure. The system can also include at least one tracking device, which can be coupled to the proximal end, the distal end, a portion of the elongated flexible body between the proximal end and the distal end or combinations thereof. The system can include at least one optical fiber coupled to the elongated flexible body that includes a plurality of strain sensors, and a tracking system that can track a position of the tracking device relative to the anatomical structure. The system can further include an optical system that can read the plurality of strain sensors on the at least one optical fiber. The system can include a navigation system that can determine a position of the elongated flexible body based on the tracking of the first tracking device and a shape of the elongated flexible body based on the reading of the plurality of strain sensors. The system can also include a display that can display an image of the anatomical structure with the position and shape of the elongated flexible body superimposed on the anatomical structure.” Prior art reference Hartig (US 20170136238 A1) discloses “…implanting an implantable stimulator into a patient; implanting a lead into the patient, the lead having a MEMS film comprising: a plurality of electrodes; a plurality of periphery traces at least partially encircling each of the plurality of electrodes; and at least two connection points coupling each of the plurality of periphery traces with a respective one of the plurality of electrodes; driving the lead toward a first target location in the patient, wherein the first target location comprises one of a first, a second, a third, or a fourth gyms of an anterior insular cortex; a superior-anterior insula; an inferior-anterior insula; an anterior-anterior insula; a posterior-anterior insula; a large insular gyms of a posterior insula; a superior-posterior insula; or an inferior-posterior insula; generating, by the implantable stimulator, an electrical signal; and delivering the electrical signal to the first target location via at least one of the plurality of electrodes.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Related Applications/Similarly Assigned: Stevenson et al. US 20230120840 A1 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MIA M THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)270-1583. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8:30am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen (Steve) Koziol can be reached at (408) 918-7630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MIA M. THOMAS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2665 /MIA M THOMAS/Primary Examiner Art Unit 2665
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 14, 2024
Application Filed
May 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749279
IDENTIFYING ANOMALY LOCATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749578
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER AUTHENTICATION IN VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749284
REDUCING A SEARCH SPACE FOR ITEM IDENTIFICATION USING MACHINE LEARNING
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743783
GENERATING IMPROVED PANOPTIC SEGMENTED DIGITAL IMAGES BASED ON PANOPTIC SEGMENTATION NEURAL NETWORKS THAT UTILIZE EXEMPLAR UNKNOWN OBJECT CLASSES
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738085
PADDING SENSITIVE BATCH CONSTRUCTION FOR TEXT RECOGNITION
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month