Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/915,230

APPLICATION INTERACTIVITY FOR HOSTED APPLICATIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 14, 2024
Priority
Jun 02, 2017 — provisional 62/514,742 +4 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, QUANG N
Art Unit
2441
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
452 granted / 515 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
548
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
65.6%
+25.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 515 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Detailed Action 1. This Office Action is responsive to the Amendment filed 04/23/2026. Claims 1-20 are presented for examination. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Terminal Disclaimer 2. The terminal disclaimer filed on 04/23/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of the full statutory term of prior patent number 10827319 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Response to Arguments 3. Applicant’s arguments filed 04/23/2026 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground of rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 5. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Alsina et al. (US 2017/0359282 A1), hereinafter “Alsina”. 6. As to claim 1, Alsina teaches a method comprising: displaying, by a first application and on a device, a view of a user interface of a second application within a view of the first application (Fig. 4B, 5B), the user interface comprising content corresponding to the second application ([0099]: the extension app is displayed by the messaging app with a particular view or style); receiving, by the first application, a request to change the view of the user interface of the second application within the view of the first application ([0099]: the extension app can request a change in the presentation view/style by providing a call to the messaging app to cause that change to occur); and responsive to receiving the request, changing, by the first application, the view of the user interface of the second application ([0099]: the messaging app changes the presentation style/view and displays the extension app within the requested view presentation view/style). 7. As to claim 2, Alsina teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the request is received via user input with respect to the view of the user interface of the second application ([0097]: the compact view icon 223A can be selected by the user to cause the system to change from the expanded view shown in FIG. 7B back to the compact view, such as the view shown in FIG. 5A). 8. As to claim 3, Alsina teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the request to change the view comprises a request to change from a compact view to an expanded view, a request to change from the expanded view to the compact view, or a request to close the view ([0097]: the compact view icon 223A can be selected by the user to cause the system to change from the expanded view shown in FIG. 7B back to the compact view, such as the view shown in FIG. 5A). 9. As to claim 4, Alsina teaches the method of claim 3, wherein the request comprises the request to change from the compact view to the expanded view ([0091]: an expanded view icon 223 which when selected can case the extension app to switch from its current compact view to an expended view) and the expanded view of the user interface overlaps at least a portion of the view of the first application ([0097]: FIG. 7B shows an example of an expanded view in which the drawing canvas 215A occupies most of the space of the touch screen). 10. As to claim 5, Alsina teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the content corresponding to the second application is received by the first application via an inter-process communication ([0091]: in the case of the extension app, this created content was communicated from the extension app through the IPC frame work to the messaging app and then presented within the message bubble). 11. As to claim 6, Alsina teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the second application comprises an extension application ([0095]: a messaging app can launch different types of extension apps). 12. As to claim 7, Alsina teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the view of the user interface of the second application is configured to provide output from the second application ([0091]: in the case of the extension app, this created content was communicated from the extension app through the IPC frame work to the messaging app and then presented within the message bubble 230). 13. Claims 8-20 are corresponding device and non-transitory machine-readable medium claims that recite similar limitations as of method claims 1-7 and do not contain any additional limitations with respect to novelty and/or inventive steps; therefore, they are rejected under the same rationale. 14. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Peterson et al. (US 2017/0359702 A1) Weinig et al. (US 2017/0359285 A1) 15. A shortened statutory period for reply to this action is set to expire THREE (3) months from the mailing date of this communication. See 37 CFR 1.134. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUANG N. NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571) 272-3886. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s SPE, KAMAL B. DIVECHA, can be reached at (571) 272-5863. The fax phone number for the organization is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from the Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUANG N NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2453
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 23, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598240
USER INTERACTION AND TASK MANAGEMENT USING MULTIPLE DEVICES
2y 3m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592881
IMPROVED SCALING EFFICIENCY FOR INTERNAL TRANSPORT SERVICES IN DISTRIBUTED NETWORK ELEMENTS
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587893
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMIZING SIGNALING WITH TRAFFIC DETECTION FUNCTION
1y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580990
CONNECTIVITY FRAMEWORK HAVING UNIFIED STACK AND MESSAGING PROTOCOL FOR EMBEDDED SECURE CONNECTIVITY
2y 0m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574447
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TENANT SPECIFIC DATA MODELING FOR FIELD VERSIONING AND DOMAIN INTERCONNECTION
1y 7m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.2%)
2y 6m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 515 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month