Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/916,196

AVIATION CONNECTIVITY GATEWAY MODULE FOR REMOTE DATA OFFLOAD

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Priority
Nov 27, 2019 — provisional 62/941,443 +2 more
Examiner
HONG, DUNG
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
658 granted / 786 resolved
+21.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
807
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
61.2%
+21.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 786 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION This is in response to applicant's communication filed on 10/15/2024, wherein: Claim 1 is pending. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 15 of U.S. Patent No. US 11659490 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because their scope are overlapped. 18916196 US 11659490 B2 1. An aviation connectivity gateway module for remotely offloading aircraft data from avionics of an aircraft, the avionics including a plurality of sensors, the aviation connectivity gateway module comprising: a processor configured to receive a remote wake-up command indicating an invocation to wake up and power on the avionics to pull sensor readings from the sensors; a first communication element configured to communicatively couple the processor to the avionics when the processor receives the remote wake-up command; a second communication element configured to communicatively couple the processor to a remote computing device; and a memory configured to store the aircraft data obtained from the avionics, wherein the processor is further configured to: power on the avionics when the processor receives the remote wake-up command and the avionics are initially in a powered off state, obtain the aircraft data from the avionics and store the aircraft data on the memory when the avionics have been powered on, and transmit the aircraft data from the memory to the remote computing device via the second communication element so as to remotely acquire aircraft data when the avionics are initially in the powered off state, the aviation connectivity gateway module is configured to transmit the aircraft data via a backup transmission means if a primary transmission means is unavailable, the aviation connectivity gateway module being configured to operate in an airborne mode, a ground mode, a sleep mode, a deep sleep mode, and a pilot data request mode, the aviation connectivity gateway module being further configured to switch from the deep sleep mode to the pilot data request mode when the processor receives the remote wake-up command, the aviation connectivity gateway module being configured to generate aircraft data independently from the avionics. 15. An aviation connectivity gateway module for remotely offloading aircraft data from avionics of an aircraft, the avionics including a plurality of sensors, the aviation connectivity gateway module comprising: a processor configured to receive a remote wake-up command indicating an invocation to wake up and power on the avionics to pull sensor readings from the sensors; a first communication element configured to communicatively couple the processor to the avionics when the processor receives the remote wake-up command; a second communication element configured to communicatively couple the processor to a remote computing device; and a memory configured to store the aircraft data obtained from the avionics, wherein the processor is further configured to: power on the avionics when the processor receives the remote wake-up command and the avionics are initially in a powered off state, initialize an interface according to aircraft configurations in a configuration file, obtain the aircraft data from the avionics and store the aircraft data on the memory when the avionics have been powered on, and transmit the aircraft data from the memory to the remote computing device via the second communication element in reverse order so as to remotely acquire aircraft data when the avionics are initially in the powered off state, the aviation connectivity gateway module is configured to transmit the aircraft data via a backup transmission means if a primary transmission means is unavailable, the aviation connectivity gateway module being configured to operate in an airborne mode, a ground mode, a sleep mode, a deep sleep mode, and a pilot data request mode, the aviation connectivity gateway module being further configured to switch from the deep sleep mode to the pilot data request mode when the processor receives the remote wake-up command, the aviation connectivity gateway module being configured to generate aircraft data independently from the avionics. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1-2, 6, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. US 12150061 B2 in view of Baum et al. (US 20090077623 A1). Regarding claim 1, U.S. Patent No. US 12150061 B2 discloses an aviation connectivity gateway module for remotely offloading aircraft data from avionics of an aircraft, the avionics including a plurality of sensors, the aviation connectivity gateway module comprising (claim 1 – “An aviation connectivity gateway module for remotely offloading aircraft data from avionics of an aircraft, the avionics including a plurality of sensors, the aviation connectivity gateway module comprising”): a processor configured to receive a remote wake-up command indicating an invocation to wake up and power on the avionics to pull sensor readings from the sensors (claim 1 – “a processor configured to receive a remote wake-up command when the avionics are in a powered off state and the aircraft is not flying, the remote wake-up command indicating an invocation to wake up and power on the avionics to obtain sensor readings from the sensors”); a first communication element configured to communicatively couple the processor to the avionics when the processor receives the remote wake-up command (claim 1 – “a first communication element configured to communicatively couple the processor to the avionics when the processor receives the remote wake-up command”); a second communication element configured to communicatively couple the processor to a remote computing device (claim 1 – “a second communication element configured to communicatively couple the processor to a remote computing device”); and a memory configured to store the aircraft data obtained from the avionics (claim 2 – “a memory configured to store the aircraft data obtained from the avionics”), wherein the processor is further configured to: power on the avionics when the processor receives the remote wake-up command and the avionics are initially in a powered off state, obtain the aircraft data from the avionics and store the aircraft data on the memory when the avionics have been powered on (claim 1 – “wherein the processor is further configured to: power on the avionics when the processor receives the remote wake-up command; obtain the aircraft data from the avionics when the avionics have been powered on”), and transmit the aircraft data from the memory to the remote computing device via the second communication element so as to remotely acquire aircraft data when the avionics are initially in the powered off state (claim 1 – “transmit the aircraft data to the remote computing device via the second communication element so as to remotely acquire aircraft data when the avionics are in the powered off state and the aircraft is not flying”), the aviation connectivity gateway module being configured to operate in an airborne mode, a ground mode, a sleep mode, a deep sleep mode, and a pilot data request mode, the aviation connectivity gateway module being further configured to switch from the deep sleep mode to the pilot data request mode when the processor receives the remote wake-up command (claim 6 – “wherein the aviation connectivity gateway module is configured to operate in an airborne mode, a ground mode, a sleep mode, a deep sleep mode, and a pilot data request mode, the aviation connectivity gateway module being configured to switch from the deep sleep mode to the pilot data request mode when the processor receives the remote wake-up command”), the aviation connectivity gateway module being configured to generate aircraft data independently from the avionics (claim 10 – “wherein the aviation connectivity gateway module is configured to generate aircraft data independently from the avionics”). However, U.S. Patent No. US 12150061 B2 is silent on details about (1) the aviation connectivity gateway module is configured to transmit the aircraft data via a backup transmission means if a primary transmission means is unavailable. Baum discloses that the aviation connectivity gateway module is configured to transmit the aircraft data via a backup transmission means if a primary transmission means is unavailable (claim 24 – “wherein the gateway transmits event data of the security system to the central monitoring station over the secondary communication link when the primary communication link is unavailable”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before effective filing date of the claimed the invention, to modify the invention of U.S. Patent No. US 12150061 B2 to incorporate secondary communication link from Baum because doing so would apply a known technique to a known device (method, or product) ready for improvement to yield predictable results (MPEP §2141 -III) to improve the reliability of data connection. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DUNG HONG whose telephone number is (571)270-7928. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, JINSONG HU, can be reached on (571) 272-3965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /DUNG HONG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701387
LOCATION-SPECIFIC SERVICES PROVIDED VIA SHORT-RANGE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN BUSINESS BEACONS AND USER DEVICES ON A TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700917
SYSTEM FOR SATELLITE DATA TRAFFIC SHAPING
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696163
INFORMATION OBTAINING METHOD, PROCESSING METHOD, NODE, NETWORK DEVICE AND APPARATUS
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694769
GENERATING WATCH LISTS FOR RETAIL STORES BASED ON UNSTRUCTURED DATA AND SYSTEM-BASED INFERENCES
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684317
TARGET OBJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, TARGET OBJECT MANAGEMENT SERVER, AND TARGET OBJECT MANAGEMENT METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 786 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month