Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/916,601

PASSENGER DEVICE PAIRING VIA WIRELESS CHARGING PAD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Priority
Oct 16, 2023 — provisional 63/590,770
Examiner
HAN, CLEMENCE S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1026 granted / 1129 resolved
+30.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1152
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§103
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1129 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4-6, 8-11, 14-16 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Klassen (US Pub. 2015/0099462). Regarding claim 1, Klassen teaches a method of pairing a passenger electronic device (PED) and an inflight entertainment and communication (IFEC) network (see “mobile device 120 to connect with and/or otherwise communicate with any one or more wireless resources 110, 914, 912” in [0073] and “mobile device 120 can be engaged with a support 400, by means of supports 410, 411, 610, and NFC devices 423, etc., on a vehicle information system such as a plane, bus, train, etc” in [0100]), comprising: detecting a placement of the PED in a charging platform onboard a commercial passenger vehicle (“when the mobile device 120 and the support 400 engaged, their respective wireless charging elements 420a, 420b are brought into sufficient proximity, and/or are otherwise positioned, to enable wireless charging of batteries and/or other devices of a power system of the device 120” in [0070]); communicating, upon the detecting the placement, a first pairing information between the PED and the IFEC network via a first communication link, wherein the first pairing information comprises a unique identifier of the PED or an identification of a wireless access point (“when the mobile device 120 and the support 400 engaged, … cause the mobile device 120 to execute one or more wireless communication functions. Data stored in memory(ies) 430 can be configured for causing any of a wide variety of communication functions, in any of a wide variety of ways. For example, a persistent memory 430 can include data suitable for causing … a mobile device 120 to connect with and/or otherwise communicate with any one or more wireless resources 110, 914, 912, etc. For example, the data may include address information, such as a uniform resource locator or other address associated with a device communicatively linked to a local- and/or wide-area network, etc; a media access control (MAC) address, Bluetooth profile information, device ID or information, WiFi SSID, URL, security credentials, passcodes, and the like; … and establish one or more communication sessions therewith” in [0071]-[0073]); and using the first pairing information to facilitate communication between the PED and the IFEC network via a second communication link (“establish one or more communication sessions therewith” in [0073]). Regarding claims 4 and 14, Klassen teaches the first communication link comprises a low bandwidth communication over the charging platform (see “NFC” and “The releaseable engagement mechanisms on the mobile device 120 and/or support 400 can be configured and/or arranged such that when the mobile device 120 and the support 400 engaged, the persistent memory can be accessed by the mobile device 120 NFC system 8132. In various examples, persistent memory(ies) 430 can include data, which when read by an NFC system 8132 of the mobile device 120, can cause the mobile device 120 to execute one or more wireless communication functions” in [0071]). Regarding claims 5 and 15, Klassen teaches the second communication link comprises an inflight wireless link (“wireless communication” in [0075] and “mobile device 120 can be engaged with a support 400, by means of supports 410, 411, 610, and NFC devices 423, etc., on a vehicle information system such as a plane, bus, train, etc” in [0100]). Regarding claims 6 and 16, Klassen teaches disconnecting, upon detecting a break in the placement, at least a portion of the communication via the second communication link (“when the magnetic field is no longer detected and/or the persistent memory can no longer be accessed, the processor(s) can be configured to end, disconnect, or otherwise stop executing the wireless communication function” in [0080]). Regarding claims 8 and 18, Klassen teaches the first communication link is a near field communication (NFC) link [0071] and wherein the second communication link is a wireless local area communication (WLAN) link (see “WiFi” in [0075]). Regarding claims 9 and 19, Klassen teaches the using the first pairing information to facilitate communication between the PED and the IFEC network via a second communication link comprises: requesting a user confirmation to establish the second communication link (“allow a user to control when her/her device is connected/disconnected to a vehicle via Bluetooth” in [0056]). Regarding claims 10 and 20, Klassen teaches the using the first pairing information to facilitate communication between the PED and the IFEC network via a second communication link comprises: establishing the second communication link in absence of a user input ( “The releaseable engagement mechanisms on the mobile device 120 and/or support 400 can be configured and/or arranged such that when the mobile device 120 and the support 400 engaged, the persistent memory can be accessed by the mobile device 120 NFC system 8132. In various examples, persistent memory(ies) 430 can include data, which when read by an NFC system 8132 of the mobile device 120, can cause the mobile device 120 to execute one or more wireless communication functions” in [0071]). Regarding claim 11, Klassen teaches a system for secure pairing between a passenger electronic device (PED) and an inflight network (see “mobile device 120 to connect with and/or otherwise communicate with any one or more wireless resources 110, 914, 912” in [0073] and “mobile device 120 can be engaged with a support 400, by means of supports 410, 411, 610, and NFC devices 423, etc., on a vehicle information system such as a plane, bus, train, etc” in [0100]), comprising: a charging platform configured to establish a first network connection with a PED (“when the mobile device 120 and the support 400 engaged, their respective wireless charging elements 420a, 420b are brought into sufficient proximity, and/or are otherwise positioned, to enable wireless charging of batteries and/or other devices of a power system of the device 120” in [0070]); and a second network connection (“any one or more wireless resources 110, 914, 912, etc” in [0073]); wherein the system is configured to perform a method comprising: detecting a placement of a PED on the charging platform (“when the mobile device 120 and the support 400 engaged, their respective wireless charging elements 420a, 420b are brought into sufficient proximity, and/or are otherwise positioned, to enable wireless charging of batteries and/or other devices of a power system of the device 120” in [0070]); communicating, upon the detecting the placement, a first pairing information between the PED and the inflight network via a first communication link (“when the mobile device 120 and the support 400 engaged, … cause the mobile device 120 to execute one or more wireless communication functions. Data stored in memory(ies) 430 can be configured for causing any of a wide variety of communication functions, in any of a wide variety of ways. For example, a persistent memory 430 can include data suitable for causing … a mobile device 120 to connect with and/or otherwise communicate with any one or more wireless resources 110, 914, 912, etc. For example, the data may include address information, such as a uniform resource locator or other address associated with a device communicatively linked to a local- and/or wide-area network, etc; a media access control (MAC) address, Bluetooth profile information, device ID or information, WiFi SSID, URL, security credentials, passcodes, and the like; … and establish one or more communication sessions therewith” in [0071]-[0073]); and using the first pairing information to facilitate communication between the PED and the inflight network via a second communication link (“establish one or more communication sessions therewith” in [0073]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2, 3, 12 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Klassen in view of Daoura et al. (US Pub. 2024/0362994). Regarding claims 2 and 12, Klassen teaches the limitations in claims 1 and 11 as shown above. Klassen, however, does not teach the charging platform comprises a Qi wireless charging platform. Daoura teaches the charging platform comprises a Qi wireless charging platform (“Inductive charging is achieved with a Qi” in [0206]). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Klassen to have the charging platform comprises a Qi wireless charging platform. as taught by Daoura in order to achieve Inductive charging [0206]. Regarding claims 3 and 13, Daoura teaches the charging platform is a universal serial bus (USB) charging platform (“a USB port 1954 for charging” in [0208]). Claims 7 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Klassen in view of Weaver et al. (US 7,245,908). Regarding claims 7 and 17, Klassen teaches the limitations in claims 1 and 11 as shown above. Klassen, however, does not teach disconnecting the pairing upon occurrence of an event of the commercial passenger vehicle. Weaber teaches disconnecting the pairing upon occurrence of an event of the commercial passenger vehicle (“if a call is in progress between the mobile station 14 and another phone, and the user of the mobile station 14 travels above the allowable altitude level (e.g., the user boards a plane that departs), then the call may need to be disconnected” in Column 10 Line 65 – Column 11 Line 2). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Klassen to have disconnecting the pairing upon occurrence of an event of the commercial passenger vehicle as taught by Weaber in order to according to follow allowable altitude guidelines (Column 11 line 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CLEMENCE S HAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3158. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edan Orgad can be reached at (571)272-7884. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CLEMENCE S HAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2414
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707471
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BEAM MANAGEMENT FOR MULTI-STREAM TRANSMISSION
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707340
METHODS, APPARATUSES, RELATED COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT AND DATA STRUCTURE FOR DECIDING ON A SIGNALING SCHEME FOR HANDOVER
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701582
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL CAPACITY
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701461
REPORTING HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696271
SCHEDULING REQUEST RESOURCE CONFIGURATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+5.2%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1129 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month