Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/916,725

SETUP SUPPORT SYSTEM, SETUP SUPPORT METHOD, AND INFORMATION STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Examiner
SYED, FARHAN M
Art Unit
2161
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Cybozu Labs Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
621 granted / 829 resolved
+19.9% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
858
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 829 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims In response to communications filed on 25 November 2025, claims 1-16 are presently pending in the application, of which, claims 1, 14, and 15 are presented in independent form. The Examiner acknowledges amended claims 1, 3-5, and 14-15, and newly added claim 16. No claims were cancelled. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Japan on 06 November 2023. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the Japanese Patent Application JP 2023-189430 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Response to Remarks/Arguments All objections and/or rejections issued in the previous Office Action, mailed 26 August 2025, have been withdrawn, unless otherwise noted in this Office Action. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-16 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable by Sipe, Richard Vance, et al (U.S. 2025/0022028, filed 27 December 2023, claiming benefit from provisional application no. 63/513,346, filed 12 July 2023 and known hereinafter as Sipe) in view of Goyal, Gaurav, et al (U.S. 2024/0036835 and known hereinafter as Goyal)(newly presented). As per claim 1, Sipe teaches a setup support system for setting up a database comprising at least one processor, the at least one processor being configured to: identify a setting operation performed by a user in order to set a setting of a database to be created (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0038-0042], which discloses an artificial intelligence system that includes generative AI code lookup engine, training data, generative AI code lookup engine operations, etc, where the generative AI code lookup provides an operation state to create generative AI code in the generative AI application.); support setting up of the database by the user based on the setting operation and a machine learning model which has learned training data created based on a setting for training (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].); and generating the database (e.g. Sipe, see paragraph [0058] which discloses generated AI model us used to generate code lookup data, where the generative AI code lookup engine is associated with the machine learning engine. See further paragraph [0085], which discloses machine learning engine can include machine learning models generated using the machine learning engine workflow, where machine learning models can include generative AI models and traditional AI models that can be both employed, where generative AI models are designed to generate new data (e.g. database), often in the form of text, images, or other media, based on patterns and knowledge learned from existing data.). Sipe does not explicitly disclose low-code or no-code; the setting operation is performed by the user, wherein the user selects the setting operation from a pre-defined list of settings that are displayed to the user, each of the setting in the pre-defined list of settings further defines how the database is set up. Goyal teaches low-code or no-code (e.g. Goyal, see paragraph [0141], which discloses low-code and/or no-code users might be limited to developing web pages using only static UI components that are deployable using template-based web page editors.); the setting operation is performed by the user (e.g. Goyal, see Figure 8A, which discloses a client device requests creation of a web page. See further paragraph [0170], which discloses each of the client devices may be a user device through which a user (e.g. low-code/no-code developer) may interact with UI.), wherein the user selects the setting operation from a pre-defined list of settings that are displayed to the user (e.g. Goyal, see paragraphs [0157-0159], which discloses UI templates may be predefined UI component templates to be used in generating UI components, where the predefined UI component template may include one or more default values that define an appearance, behavior, and/or data sources of the UI components and where these default values may be overridden by a developer (e.g. user) at web page design time.), each of the setting in the pre-defined list of settings further defines how the database is set up (e.g. Goyal, see paragraph [0189-0190], which discloses based on and/or in response to reception of the web pages, the server may be configured to determine that the web page includes the runtime UI component, where the server may determine predefined UI components, runtime UI components, etc. to generate a partial representation of the web page.). Sipe is directed to generative AI code lookup engine. Goyal is directed to low-code/no-code generation containing predefined user interface component used to generate web pages to be populated by UI components. Both are analogous art because they are directed to code generation and therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the teachings of Sipe with the teachings of Goyal to include the claimed features with the motivation to improve generating low-code or no-code templates. As per claim 2, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 1, wherein the setting operation is an operation for the user to specify a setting, and wherein the at least one processor is configured to support the setting up based on the setting specified by the setting operation and the machine learning model (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0038-0042], which discloses an artificial intelligence system that includes generative AI code lookup engine, training data, generative AI code lookup engine operations, etc, where the generative AI code lookup provides an operation state to create generative AI code in the generative AI application.). As per claim 3, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 2, wherein the setting is a field setting which is a setting of a field in the database, wherein the machine learning model has learned the training data created based on a field setting for training, and wherein the at least one processor is configured to support the setting up by suggesting to the user the setting to be specified by the next setting operation based on the setting specified by the setting operations and the machine learning model (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].). As per claim 4, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 3, wherein the setting is a field type which is a type of the field, and wherein the at least one processor is configured to support the setting up by suggesting to the user the field type to be specified by the next setting operation based on the field type specified by the setting operation and the machine learning model (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0038-0042], which discloses an artificial intelligence system that includes generative AI code lookup engine, training data, generative AI code lookup engine operations, etc, where the generative AI code lookup provides an operation state to create generative AI code in the generative AI application.). As per claim 5, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 3, wherein the setting is a field layout which is a layout of the field, and wherein the at least one processor is configured to support the setting up by suggesting to the user the field layout to be specified by the next setting operation based on the field layout specified by the setting operation and the machine learning model (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].). As per claim 6, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 2, wherein the machine learning model has learned the training data created based on a database for training, and wherein the at least one processor is configured to support the setting up by suggesting the database for training to the user based on the setting specified by the setting operation and the machine learning model (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0038-0042], which discloses an artificial intelligence system that includes generative AI code lookup engine, training data, generative AI code lookup engine operations, etc, where the generative AI code lookup provides an operation state to create generative AI code in the generative AI application.). As per claim 7, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 2, wherein the machine learning model has learned the training data created based on a database for training, and wherein the at least one processor is configured to execute clustering of the database being set based on the setting specified by the setting operation and the machine learning model, and to support the setting up based on a result of execution of the clustering (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].). As per claim 8, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 2, wherein the machine learning model has learned the training data, which indicates settings specified by setting operations for training and an order in which the setting operations for training are performed, and wherein the at least one processor is configured to support the setting up based on the settings specified by the setting operations, the order in which the setting operations are performed, and the machine learning model (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0038-0042], which discloses an artificial intelligence system that includes generative AI code lookup engine, training data, generative AI code lookup engine operations, etc, where the generative AI code lookup provides an operation state to create generative AI code in the generative AI application.). As per claim 9, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 1, wherein the machine learning model is an interactive model, wherein the setting operation is an operation in which the user inputs a prompt to the machine learning model in order to set the setting, and wherein the at least one processor is configured to support the setting up by acquiring input data having a format inputtable to a database creation program for creating the database based on the prompt input by the setting operation and the machine learning model (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].). As per claim 10, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 9, wherein the at least one processor is configured to support the setting up by inputting output data output from the machine learning model to the database creation program as the input data, and causing the database creation program to output processing result data indicating a processing result of the database creation program (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0038-0042], which discloses an artificial intelligence system that includes generative AI code lookup engine, training data, generative AI code lookup engine operations, etc, where the generative AI code lookup provides an operation state to create generative AI code in the generative AI application.). As per claim 11, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 9, wherein the at least one processor is configured to: determine whether output data output from the machine learning model has the format (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].); support, when it is determined that the output data has the format, the setting up by acquiring the output data as the input data (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].); support, when it is not determined that the output data has the format, the setting up by presenting the user with a response to the prompt based on the output data (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].); and complete the setting through repeated interactions between the user and the machine learning model (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].). As per claim 12, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is configured to: acquire user attribute data indicating an attribute of the user; and support the setting up based on the setting operation, the machine learning model, and the user attribute data (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0038-0042], which discloses an artificial intelligence system that includes generative AI code lookup engine, training data, generative AI code lookup engine operations, etc, where the generative AI code lookup provides an operation state to create generative AI code in the generative AI application.). As per claim 13, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is configured to: acquire past setting data indicating a past setting which is a setting performed by the user in a past setting operation (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].); and support the setting up based on the setting operation, the machine learning model, and the past setting data (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].). As per claim 14, Sipe teaches a setup support method, comprising: identify a setting operation performed by a user in order to set a setting of a database to be created (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0038-0042], which discloses an artificial intelligence system that includes generative AI code lookup engine, training data, generative AI code lookup engine operations, etc, where the generative AI code lookup provides an operation state to create generative AI code in the generative AI application.); support setting up of the database by the user based on the setting operation and a machine learning model which has learned training data created based on a setting for training (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].); and generating the database (e.g. Sipe, see paragraph [0058] which discloses generated AI model us used to generate code lookup data, where the generative AI code lookup engine is associated with the machine learning engine. See further paragraph [0085], which discloses machine learning engine can include machine learning models generated using the machine learning engine workflow, where machine learning models can include generative AI models and traditional AI models that can be both employed, where generative AI models are designed to generate new data (e.g. database), often in the form of text, images, or other media, based on patterns and knowledge learned from existing data.). Sipe does not explicitly disclose low-code or no-code; the setting operation is performed by the user, wherein the user selects the setting operation from a pre-defined list of settings that are displayed to the user, each of the setting in the pre-defined list of settings further defines how the database is set up. Goyal teaches low-code or no-code (e.g. Goyal, see paragraph [0141], which discloses low-code and/or no-code users might be limited to developing web pages using only static UI components that are deployable using template-based web page editors.); the setting operation is performed by the user (e.g. Goyal, see Figure 8A, which discloses a client device requests creation of a web page. See further paragraph [0170], which discloses each of the client devices may be a user device through which a user (e.g. low-code/no-code developer) may interact with UI.), wherein the user selects the setting operation from a pre-defined list of settings that are displayed to the user (e.g. Goyal, see paragraphs [0157-0159], which discloses UI templates may be predefined UI component templates to be used in generating UI components, where the predefined UI component template may include one or more default values that define an appearance, behavior, and/or data sources of the UI components and where these default values may be overridden by a developer (e.g. user) at web page design time.), each of the setting in the pre-defined list of settings further defines how the database is set up (e.g. Goyal, see paragraph [0189-0190], which discloses based on and/or in response to reception of the web pages, the server may be configured to determine that the web page includes the runtime UI component, where the server may determine predefined UI components, runtime UI components, etc. to generate a partial representation of the web page.). Sipe is directed to generative AI code lookup engine. Goyal is directed to low-code/no-code generation containing predefined user interface component used to generate web pages to be populated by UI components. Both are analogous art because they are directed to code generation and therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the teachings of Sipe with the teachings of Goyal to include the claimed features with the motivation to improve generating low-code or no-code templates. As per claim 15, Sipe teaches a non-transitory information storage medium having stored thereon a program for causing a computer to: identify a setting operation performed by a user in order to set a setting of a database to be created (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0038-0042], which discloses an artificial intelligence system that includes generative AI code lookup engine, training data, generative AI code lookup engine operations, etc, where the generative AI code lookup provides an operation state to create generative AI code in the generative AI application.); support setting up of the database by the user based on the setting operation and a machine learning model which has learned training data created based on a setting for training (e.g. Sipe, see paragraphs [0027-0030, 0035-0045], which discloses providing configuration to generate personalized data including personalized copy, etc. in the generative AI model, where the code logic is implemented by generative AI machine learning models that employ collaborative filtering algorithms or deep learning models to make code data selections, as further described in paragraphs [0051-0054].); and generating the database (e.g. Sipe, see paragraph [0058] which discloses generated AI model us used to generate code lookup data, where the generative AI code lookup engine is associated with the machine learning engine. See further paragraph [0085], which discloses machine learning engine can include machine learning models generated using the machine learning engine workflow, where machine learning models can include generative AI models and traditional AI models that can be both employed, where generative AI models are designed to generate new data (e.g. database), often in the form of text, images, or other media, based on patterns and knowledge learned from existing data.). Sipe does not explicitly disclose low-code or no-code; the setting operation is performed by the user, wherein the user selects the setting operation from a pre-defined list of settings that are displayed to the user, each of the setting in the pre-defined list of settings further defines how the database is set up. Goyal teaches low-code or no-code (e.g. Goyal, see paragraph [0141], which discloses low-code and/or no-code users might be limited to developing web pages using only static UI components that are deployable using template-based web page editors.); the setting operation is performed by the user (e.g. Goyal, see Figure 8A, which discloses a client device requests creation of a web page. See further paragraph [0170], which discloses each of the client devices may be a user device through which a user (e.g. low-code/no-code developer) may interact with UI.), wherein the user selects the setting operation from a pre-defined list of settings that are displayed to the user (e.g. Goyal, see paragraphs [0157-0159], which discloses UI templates may be predefined UI component templates to be used in generating UI components, where the predefined UI component template may include one or more default values that define an appearance, behavior, and/or data sources of the UI components and where these default values may be overridden by a developer (e.g. user) at web page design time.), each of the setting in the pre-defined list of settings further defines how the database is set up (e.g. Goyal, see paragraph [0189-0190], which discloses based on and/or in response to reception of the web pages, the server may be configured to determine that the web page includes the runtime UI component, where the server may determine predefined UI components, runtime UI components, etc. to generate a partial representation of the web page.). Sipe is directed to generative AI code lookup engine. Goyal is directed to low-code/no-code generation containing predefined user interface component used to generate web pages to be populated by UI components. Both are analogous art because they are directed to code generation and therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the teachings of Sipe with the teachings of Goyal to include the claimed features with the motivation to improve generating low-code or no-code templates. As per claim 16, the modified teachings of Sipe with Goyal teaches the setup support system according to claim 1, wherein the database is generated with no-code when the user does not input code in a database language or a programming language (e.g. Goyal, see paragraph [0141], which discloses low-code and/or no-code users might be limited to developing web pages using only static UI components that are deployable using template-based web page editors.); wherein the database is generated with low-code when the user inputs a minimum amount of input code in the database language or the programming language (e.g. Goyal, see paragraph [0141], which discloses low-code and/or no-code users might be limited to developing web pages using only static UI components that are deployable using template-based web page editors.). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. See attached PTO-892 that includes additional prior art of record describing the general state of the art in which the invention is directed to. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FARHAN M SYED whose telephone number is (571)272-7191. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Apu Mofiz can be reached at 571-272-4080. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FARHAN M SYED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2161 February 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 31, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 25, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602674
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOTELY MODIFYING CLOUD-BASED CLIENT APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597071
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF SWITCHING BETWEEN A FIRST EXECUTION MODE AND SECOND EXECUTION MODE FOR MATCH PROCESSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591792
DYNAMICALLY ENRICHING SHARED KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12579470
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISTRIBUTING LAYERS OF SPECIAL MIXTURE-OF-EXPERTS MACHINE LEARNING MODELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579207
LOCATION-BASED SEARCHING USING A SEARCH AREA THAT CORRESPONDS TO A GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF A COMPUTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+23.4%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 829 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month