Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/916,795

ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Priority
Dec 21, 2023 — JP 2023-215958
Examiner
ORTEGA, JOSEPH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
309 granted / 427 resolved
+12.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
442
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
59.2%
+19.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 427 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nagase (US 11,705,785) In view of Yazaki (US 2022/0316394). Regarding Claim 1, Nagase discloses a rotary electric machine [11] comprising: a stator [10] having a stator core [15] and a coil [40] that is wound around the stator core [15] (FIG. 1-2); a rotor [30] that rotates relative to the stator [10] (FIG. 1); a rotary electric machine case [13] which has an inner portion that accommodates the stator [10] and the rotor and the stator [10] is provided in the inner portion (FIG. 1); and a temperature sensor [70] that is in contact with the coil [70] and determines a temperature of the coil (FIG. 1-2, Claim 7; the temperature sensor is located on an inner side of the first rectilinear portions in the radial direction of the stator core), wherein a recess groove [grooves for each Cv, Cw, Cu] is provided on an outer surface of the coil [40] (FIG. 2), an outside of the temperature sensor [70] is covered by a holding member in a state where the temperature sensor [70] is in contact with an inner surface of the recess groove, and the temperature sensor is attached to the coil via the holding member (as shown in FIG. 2 and more in detail in FIG. 19). Nagase does not disclose a flow path of a cooling liquid for cooling. Yakasi teaches a flow path of a cooling liquid for cooling [The main housing 16 has a substantially cylindrical shape in which a thick side wall extends along a lateral (left-right) direction. A cooling jacket 21 through which a cooling medium flows is formed in the inner portion of the side wall. As a specific example of the cooling medium, there may be cited cooling water, and in this case, the cooling jacket 21 is a water jacket] (¶ [0037]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate Yakasi teachings into Nagase’s rotary electric machine. One would be motivated to do so help cool the rotary electric machine Regarding Claim 2, Nagase in view of Yakasi disclose rotary electric machine according to claim 1, Nagase discloses wherein a holding groove that has a recess shape [shown as S2 or S1] and holds an outer surface of the temperature sensor [70] in a state of being in contact with s or the outer surface of the temperature sensor is formed on the holding member (as shown in FIG. 19). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH ORTEGA whose telephone number is (469)295-9083. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TULSIDAS C. PATEL can be reached at (571)272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH ORTEGA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681041
SOCKET AND INSPECTION SOCKET
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676522
MAGNET RETENTION IN EXTERIOR ROTOR ELECTRIC MACHINES
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671297
NOISE REDUCTION AND SHOCK ABSORPTION STRUCTURE OF TUBULAR MOTOR
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665481
LINEAR MOTOR
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655777
SHIP WASTE HEAT POWER GENERATION SYSTEM UTILIZING WASTE HEAT FROM SHIPS
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+16.1%)
2y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 427 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month