Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/916,841

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Priority
Nov 08, 2023 — JP 2023-191063
Examiner
HEREDIA OCASIO, ARLENE J
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
398 granted / 529 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
560
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
69.9%
+29.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 529 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, applying a development bias - in a case where the humidity detected by the humidity sensor is a second humidity lower than a first humidity - in a case where the humidity detected by the humidity sensor is the first humidity - so that the duty ratio in the second period is larger than the duty ratio in the first period must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: in the 11th line, the word latent is misspelled. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim(s) 1 and 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9,250,563 to Funayama in view of JP 2001166573 to Hamakawa et al. Regarding claim 1, Funayama teaches an image forming apparatus (1, Fig.1) comprising: an image bearing member (11); a charging portion (12) configured to charge the image bearing member to a predetermined charging potential (VH, Fi.4); a latent image forming portion (10) configured to form an electrostatic latent image on the image bearing member charged to the predetermined charging potential by the charging portion; a developer bearing member (14a) configured to bear and feed a developer including toner (T) and an external additive (A) having the same (negative) polarity as a charging polarity of the toner in a developing area where the electrostatic latent image formed on the image bearing member by the latent image forming portion is developed (Fig.3B); and a developing bias application portion (114a. Fig.2) configured to apply a developing bias in which a DC voltage (VD, Fig.4) is superposed with an AC voltage (VA, Fig.4) to the developer bearing member, wherein in a case where in a continuous image forming job in which the image is formed on a plurality of recording materials including a first recording material and a second recording material subsequent to the first recording material, a period from when a leading end of a first electrostatic latent image for the first recording material passes through the developing area until a trailing end of the first electrostatic latent image passes through the developing area is defined as a first period (region S1), and a period from when the trailing end of the first electrostatic latent image passes through the developing area until a leading end of a second electrostatic latent image for the second recording material passes through the developing area, and the latent image forming portion does not form the electrostatic latent image on the image bearing member is defined as a second period (region S2), a peak-to-peak voltage of the AC voltage in the second period (VA1) is larger than a peak-to-peak voltage of the AC voltage in the first period (VA0) (Fig.6); and wherein a polarity of the DC voltage in the first period and a polarity of the DC voltage in the second period are the same polarity of the charging polarity of the toner (e.g., VD0=-500V). Funayama appears silent about changing an absolute value of a difference between the predetermined charging potential and the DC voltage in the first and second periods. Hamakawa teaches an image forming apparatus (1,Fig.1) comprising: an image bearing member (1); a charging portion (2) configured to charge the image bearing member to a predetermined charging potential; a latent image forming portion (14) configured to form an electrostatic latent image on the image bearing member charged to the predetermined charging potential by the charging portion; a developer bearing member (3) configured to bear and feed a developer in a developing area where the electrostatic latent image formed on the image bearing member by the latent image forming portion is developed; and a developing bias application portion (5) configured to apply a developing bias in which a DC voltage is superposed with an AC voltage to the developer bearing member, wherein in a case where in a continuous image forming job in which the image is formed on a plurality of recording materials including a first recording material and a second recording material subsequent to the first recording material, a period from when a leading end of a first electrostatic latent image for the first recording material passes through the developing area until a trailing end of the first electrostatic latent image passes through the developing area is defined as a first period (e.g., T1 to T2), and a period from when the trailing end of the first electrostatic latent image passes through the developing area until a leading end of a second electrostatic latent image for the second recording material passes through the developing area, and the latent image forming portion does not form the electrostatic latent image on the image bearing member is defined as a second period (e.g., T2 to T3), the developing bias application portion applies the developing bias to the developer bearing member so that an absolute value of a difference (V2-V1) between the predetermined charging potential and the DC voltage in the second period is larger than an absolute value of a difference between the predetermined charging potential and the DC voltage in the first period (V2-V5), wherein a polarity of the DC voltage is the same polarity of the charging polarity of the toner and V5<V1 (Fig.5). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the image forming apparatus of Funayama such that (claim 1) the developing bias application portion applies the developing bias to the developer bearing member so that an absolute value of a difference between the predetermined charging potential and the DC voltage in the second period is larger than an absolute value of a difference between the predetermined charging potential and the DC voltage in the first period, (claim 2) wherein a polarity of the DC voltage in the first period and a polarity of the DC voltage in the second period are the same polarity of the charging polarity of the toner, and wherein the absolute value of the DC voltage in the second period is smaller than the absolute value of the DC voltage in the first period for at least the purpose of preventing image density defects. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9,250,563 to Funayama in view of JP 2001166573 to Hamakawa et al., as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of JP 4265899 and US 5,170,210 to Saruwatari. Regarding claim 4, Funayama in view of Hamakawa renders obvious an image forming apparatus according to Claim 1, but appear silent about a humidity sensor and related control thereof. JP 4265899 teaches an electrophotographic apparatus characterized in that the background potential is controlled by a developing bias control means to remove aggregates of additives contained in the toner adhering to the image carrier; the background potential is increased when a surplus rate is high, and decreased when the surplus rate is low. Saruwatari discloses an image forming apparatus comprising a humidity detector 38 and teaches that a charging amount of toner increases and humidity decreases (Fig.3E). Due to the higher charging amount, one skilled in the art would understand that a surplus rate would be higher in a low humidity environment. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure the image forming apparatus according to claim 1 such that it further comprises a humidity sensor configured to detect a humidity, wherein the developing bias application portion applies the developing bias to the developer bearing member so that an absolute value of a difference between the predetermined charging potential and the DC voltage in the second period and in a case where the humidity detected by the humidity sensor is a second humidity lower than a first humidity is larger than an absolute value of a difference between the predetermined charging potential and the DC voltage in the second period and in a case where the humidity detected by the humidity sensor is the first humidity, and so that the peak-to-peak voltage of the AC voltage in the second period and in a case where the humidity detected by the humidity sensor is the second humidity is larger than the peak-to-peak voltage of the AC voltage in the second period and in a case where the humidity detected by the humidity sensor is the first humidity for at least the purpose of accounting for an environment influence on image density. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9,250,563 to Funayama in view of JP 2001166573 to Hamakawa et al., as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of US 6163663 to Shinohara et al. Regarding claim 4, Funayama in view of Hamakawa renders obvious an image forming apparatus according to Claim 1, but appear silent about the claimed duty ratio. Shinohara discloses an image forming apparatus wherein the developer is externally added with additive having a charging polarity opposite from that of the developer and including voltage a control device for controlling the developing voltage so as to change force for directing the additive toward a non-image portion of the image bearing member. Shinohara further discloses that the ratio at which the positive external additive jumps can be controlled by controlling the jumping side area size by controlling either the magnitude of the contrast V or the length of the period T2, or by controlling both (Fig.4, col. 9 lines 14-51). Cleaning of positive external additive was shown to improve with lower jump side area size (Tables 1 & 2). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure the image forming apparatus according to claim 1 such that in a case where a time when, of AC voltage, a voltage having the same polarity as the charging polarity of the toner to the DC voltage is applied is defined as a first application time, a time when, of AC voltage, a voltage having a polarity opposite to the charging polarity of the toner to the DC voltage is applied is defined as a second application time, and a ratio occupied by the first application time of one period which is a sum of the first application time and the second application time is defined as a duty ratio, the developing bias application portion applies the developing bias to the developer bearing member so that the duty ratio in the second period is larger than the duty ratio in the first period for at least the purpose of improving control of an amount of external additive of the photosensitive member. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARLENE HEREDIA whose telephone number is (571)272-8393. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephanie Bloss can be reached at (571)272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Arlene Heredia Ocasio/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638800
IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM PERFORMING TEMPERATURE CONTROL OF SHEET LAMINATOR BASED ON OPERATION MODES OF THE IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632003
CARTRIDGE HAVING A FRAME SUPPORTING A DEVELOPING ROLLER WITH THE FRAME BEING MOVABLE BETWEEN A DEVELOPING POSITION AND A SPACED POSITION
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631997
PRINTING SYSTEM, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625446
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12619175
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+3.9%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 529 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month