Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/916,841

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Priority
Nov 08, 2023 — JP 2023-191063
Examiner
HEREDIA OCASIO, ARLENE J
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
409 granted / 541 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
566
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 541 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, “the external additive remaining on the image bearing member adheres to the magnetic carrier in contact with the image bearing member, is carried together with the magnetic carrier into the developer container” must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The Title has been updated according to the amended Specification dated 6/05/2026. The objection to the Title has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitations "the external additive remaining on the image bearing member" and “the magnetic carrier in contact with the image bearing member” in the last wherein clause. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claim. Claim 1 recites inter alia, “wherein, during the second period, the control portion controls the developing bias application portion such that the external additive remaining on the image bearing member adheres to the magnetic carrier in contact with the image bearing member, is carried together with the magnetic carrier into the developer container, and is collected therein”. It is unclear if the recited “external additive remaining on the image bearing member” refers to earlier recited external additive included in the developer contained in the developer container or some other “external additive”. Since an external additive is recited as part of a developer, it is unclear is the external additive remaining on the image bearing member is contained in the developer or not. It is unclear if the recited “magnetic carrier in contact with the image bearing member” refers to earlier recited magnetic carrier included in the developer contained in the developer container or some other “magnetic carrier”. It is unclear if the cited passage is a result of the earlier recited control features or if it requires a separate control feature that takes place during the second period. Claims 1-4 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential elements, such omission amounting to a gap between the elements. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted elements are: structure, means, or method to distinctly ascertain what “the external additive remaining on the image bearing member” refers to. The omitted elements are essential to properly determine the difference, if any, between and additive that is include in the developer and an external additive remaining on the image bearing member. From the recited features of a continuous image forming job, it is unclear when, why, and how external additive remains on the image bearing member. It is also unclear how these features have patentable weight on the structure of the image forming apparatus. Evidence that Applicant regards the omitted matter to be essential to the invention can be found at least in the Remarks dated 06/05/2026, page 16. The issues exposed above are so severe that they preclude a reasonable search over prior art as one skilled in the art cannot determine the metes and bounds of the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 1-4 are not currently subject to a prior art rejection, but allowable subject matter cannot be determined due to the impact that possible amendments relating to rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112 may have on the claim meaning and scope. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 06/05/2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARLENE HEREDIA whose telephone number is (571)272-8393. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephanie Bloss can be reached at (571) 272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Arlene Heredia Ocasio/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 05, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704804
SHEET CONVEYANCE APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699341
HEATING DEVICE, FIXING DEVICE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693616
HEATING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS HAVING A HEATING DEVICE WITH FIRST AND SECOND MODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12681406
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD, THAT CONTROL CHARGING VOLTAGE ACCORDING TO POSITIONS OF DEVELOPING ROLLER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669770
CONTROL METHOD OF IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+3.8%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 541 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month