Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/917,002

MOUNTING ACCESSORY FOR ARMOR CARRIERS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Examiner
MUROMOTO JR, ROBERT H
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Point Blank Enterprises Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
56%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
886 granted / 1332 resolved
-3.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -11% lift
Without
With
+-10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1352
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1332 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 9, 11, 14, 15 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by US 8397312 (Crye et al.). Regarding claim 1, ‘312 discloses: a mounting accessory for an armor carrier carrying a ballistic plate donned by a wearer [seen most clearly in fig. 4], comprising: one or more resilient members projecting from an inside surface of the armor carrier [54 and 55; figs. 2 and 4]; wherein the one or more resilient members [54 and 55; figs. 2 and 4] are configured to position the ballistic plate in an aligned disposition with respect to the wearer's torso [figs. 1, 2 and 4; show the spacer pads 54 and 55 do function to affect the position/alignment of the ballistic plate 30 with respect to the torso]. Regarding claim 2, ‘312 discloses: wherein the one or more resilient members [54, 55] include one or more straps [34, 36] for attaching the resilient members to the armor carrier [see annotated figure below]. PNG media_image1.png 494 845 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claims 3 and 4, ‘312 discloses: each one of the one or more resilient members include an attachment device for removably attaching the resilient member to the interior side of the armor carrier per claim 3 and the attachment device comprises a hook and loop fastener per claim 4 [in par. 11, ’312 states, “The pads 54, 55 may be attached to the front sheet 28 in any conventional fashion. In a preferred embodiment the pads are backed with the hook material of a hook and loop fastener material like VELCRO® fastener, to allow the ready attachment and positioning of the pads. The fastening material is not shown in the drawings.”]. Regarding claim 9, ‘312 discloses: the one or more resilient members substantially conform to the wearer's torso [in par. 11, ‘312 states, “The pads may be fabricated of a conventional closed cell compression molded foam, an open cell foam, spacer fabric or any appropriately resilient material.”; open cell foam and resilient material will inherently to at least some degree ‘substantially conform’ to the surface it contacts under the weight of the complete armor carrier and movement forces of the wearer]. Regarding claim 11, ‘312 discloses: the one or more resilient members include at least one abdominal member [54, 55] having a first contoured surface [fig. 4], and wherein the abdominal member is configured to conform to the wearer's abdominal region when making contact under the weight of the armor carrier [in par. 11, ‘312 states, “The pads may be fabricated of a conventional closed cell compression molded foam, an open cell foam, spacer fabric or any appropriately resilient material.”; open cell foam and resilient material will inherently to at least some degree ‘substantially conform’ to the surface it contacts under the weight of the complete armor carrier]. Regarding claims 14 and 15, ‘312 discloses: the one or more resilient members include at least two distinct abdominal members each having a first contoured surface [54, 55; inherently both have a first contoured surface as shown in fig. 4], and wherein each abdominal member is configured to rest upon a portion of the wearer's abdomen and conform to the abdomen of the wearer when making contact under the weight of the armor carrier per claim 14 [Fig. 1 shows the device in use the pads 54 and 55 resting on the wearer’s abdomen and the resilient, open cell foam materials would inherently at least some degree ‘conform’ to the surface it contacts under the weight of the complete armor carrier.]; and wherein the first contoured surface of each abdominal member substantially matches the profile of the wearer's abdominal region [fig. 4 shows pad with a contoured surface that “substantially matches” the profile of the abdomen; further the resilient open cell foam would conform to also “substantially match” the profile of the abdomen; even further humans are of near infinite profile so the fig. 4 pad does “substantially match” the profile of at least one human wearer]. Regarding claim 17, ‘312 discloses: the aligned disposition comprises the ballistic plate being substantially parallel to the wearer's torso [fig.1 shows the device in use with ballistic plate ‘substantially parallel to the wearer’s torso]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5-8, 10, 12, 13, 16, 18-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 8397312 (Crye et al.). Regarding claims 5-8, ‘312 does explicitly fully disclose claim 3 from which claims 5-8 all intervene thereto. ‘312 explicitly states, “The pads 54, 55 may be attached to the front sheet 28 in any conventional fashion. In a preferred embodiment the pads are backed with the hook material of a hook and loop fastener material like VELCRO® fastener, to allow the ready attachment and positioning of the pads. The fastening material is not shown in the drawings.” This recitation shows ‘312 contemplates “any conventional” fastening means and further use of detachable fastening means such as hook and loop type fasteners. ‘312 does not explicitly teach the claimed zip, magnetic, buckle nor snaps; in claims 5-8, respectively. However, it is the Examiner’s position that zip, magnetic, buckle and snap fastening means are widely known and conventionally used mechanically equivalent fastening means to hook and loop type fasteners used for at least the last 100 years in the garment arts to provide simple economic detachable attachment capability to garment sections in need of fastening. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to filing the invention to modify the hook and loop fastening means of ‘312 to any known conventional detachable fastening means including zip, magnetic, buckle and/or snap type fastening means to provide simple economic detachable attachment capability to garment sections in need of fastening. Regarding claims 10 and 12, ‘312 discloses multiple abdominal resilient members each having a first contoured surface, and wherein each abdominal member is configured to rest upon a respective pectoral mass and conform to the respective pectoral mass of the wearer when making contact under the weight of the armor carrier as noted above. ‘312 does not teach these members as pectoral members per claims 10 and 12. ‘312 does further teach, “As shown in FIGS. 1 and 3, it is the belt 46 which supports the component and holds it in position on the wearer 22. For added comfort, foam pads 54, 55 are adhered to the exterior surface of the front sheet 28 of the carrier 26.”. This citation teaches the pads and belt that holds the pads function to support the armor carrier; hold in proper position the armor carrier and provide comfort for the user wearing the armor carrier. ‘312 also shows in fig. 1 the armor carrier is commonly worn with an upper torso and pectoral covering vest armor article. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to filing the invention to modify an upper torso and pectoral covering vest armor article to include a similar spacer pad construction as taught by ‘312 to provide the upper torso and pectoral covering vest armor article with multiple resilient pectoral spacer pads to provide added/enhanced support of the pectoral covering vest armor article; hold in proper position the pectoral covering vest armor article and comfort for the user of the pectoral covering vest armor article. Regarding claim 13, the pads of ‘312 are shown as having first contoured surfaces as noted above that would “substantially match the profile of the wearer’s pectoral mass” further the resilient open cell foam would conform to also “substantially match” the profile of the pectoral mass of the wearer; even further humans are of near infinite profile so the fig. 4 pad does “substantially match” the profile of at least one human wearer. Regarding claim 16, the right side and left side pads 55 shown in fig. 2 of ‘312 are ‘mirror images’ of each other. The modified teachings of ‘312 addressing claims 10 and 12 above would therefore include right and left side pectoral pads that are mirror images of each other. Claim 18 recites the combined limitations of claims 1, 10 and 11; which are fully addressed above. The same rejections are repeated below. ‘312 discloses: a mounting accessory for an armor carrier carrying a ballistic plate donned by a wearer [seen most clearly in fig. 4], comprising: one or more resilient members projecting from an inside surface of the armor carrier [54 and 55; figs. 2 and 4]; wherein the one or more resilient members [54 and 55; figs. 2 and 4] are configured to position the ballistic plate in an aligned disposition with respect to the wearer's torso [figs. 1, 2 and 4; show the spacer pads 54 and 55 do function to affect the position/alignment of the ballistic plate 30 with respect to the torso]. ‘312 discloses: the one or more resilient members include at least one abdominal member [54, 55] having a first contoured surface [fig. 4], and wherein the abdominal member is configured to conform to the wearer's abdominal region when making contact under the weight of the armor carrier [in par. 11, ‘312 states, “The pads may be fabricated of a conventional closed cell compression molded foam, an open cell foam, spacer fabric or any appropriately resilient material.”; open cell foam and resilient material will inherently to at least some degree ‘substantially conform’ to the surface it contacts under the weight of the complete armor carrier]. ‘312 does not teach these members as pectoral members attached at an upper torso area. ‘312 does further teach, “As shown in FIGS. 1 and 3, it is the belt 46 which supports the component and holds it in position on the wearer 22. For added comfort, foam pads 54, 55 are adhered to the exterior surface of the front sheet 28 of the carrier 26.”. This citation teaches the pads and belt that holds the pads function to support the armor carrier; hold in proper position the armor carrier and provide comfort for the user wearing the armor carrier. ‘312 also shows in fig. 1 the armor carrier is commonly worn with an upper torso and pectoral covering vest armor article. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to filing the invention to modify an upper torso and pectoral covering vest armor article to include a similar spacer pad construction as taught by ‘312 to provide the upper torso and pectoral covering vest armor article with multiple resilient pectoral spacer pads to provide added/enhanced support of the pectoral covering vest armor article; hold in proper position the pectoral covering vest armor article and comfort for the user of the pectoral covering vest armor article. Regarding claim 19, ‘312 does disclose the pads 54, 55 as detachably attached to the armor carrier [“The pads 54, 55 may be attached to the front sheet 28 in any conventional fashion. In a preferred embodiment the pads are backed with the hook material of a hook and loop fastener material like VELCRO® fastener, to allow the ready attachment and positioning of the pads. The fastening material is not shown in the drawings.”]. Regarding claim 20, ‘312 does disclose the pads are made of resilient open cell foam material that would “substantially conform” to the surface to which they contact. Regarding claim 21, ‘312 in fig.1 shows the device in use with ballistic plate ‘substantially parallel to the wearer’s torso’. Regarding claim 22, ‘312 does disclose pads 54, 55 as attached to the interior side of the armor carrier in figs. 2 and 4. Claim 23, ‘312 discloses: a mounting accessory for an armor carrier carrying a ballistic plate donned by a wearer [seen most clearly in fig. 4], comprising: one or more resilient members projecting from a lower inside surface of the armor carrier [54 and 55; figs. 2 and 4]; wherein the one or more resilient members [54 and 55; figs. 2 and 4] are configured to position the ballistic plate in an aligned disposition with respect to the wearer's torso [figs. 1, 2 and 4; show the spacer pads 54 and 55 do function to affect the position/alignment of the ballistic plate 30 with respect to the torso]; the one or more resilient members include at least one abdominal member [54, 55] having a first contoured surface [fig. 4], and wherein the abdominal member is configured to conform to the wearer's abdominal region when making contact under the weight of the armor carrier [in par. 11, ‘312 states, “The pads may be fabricated of a conventional closed cell compression molded foam, an open cell foam, spacer fabric or any appropriately resilient material.”; open cell foam and resilient material will inherently to at least some degree ‘substantially conform’ to the surface it contacts under the weight of the complete armor carrier]; wherein the one or more resilient members [54, 55] include one or more straps [34, 36] for attaching the resilient members to the armor carrier [see annotated figure below]; PNG media_image2.png 618 1056 media_image2.png Greyscale and the aligned disposition comprises the ballistic plate being substantially parallel to the wearer's torso [fig.1 shows the device in use with ballistic plate ‘substantially parallel to the wearer’s torso]. ‘312 does not teach these members as pectoral members attached at an upper torso area. ‘312 does further teach, “As shown in FIGS. 1 and 3, it is the belt 46 which supports the component and holds it in position on the wearer 22. For added comfort, foam pads 54, 55 are adhered to the exterior surface of the front sheet 28 of the carrier 26.”. This citation teaches the pads and belt that holds the pads function to support the armor carrier; hold in proper position the armor carrier and provide comfort for the user wearing the armor carrier. ‘312 also shows in fig. 1 the armor carrier is commonly worn with an upper torso and pectoral covering vest armor article. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to filing the invention to modify an upper torso and pectoral covering vest armor article to include a similar spacer pad construction as taught by ‘312 to provide the upper torso and pectoral covering vest armor article with multiple resilient pectoral spacer pads to provide added/enhanced support of the pectoral covering vest armor article; hold in proper position the pectoral covering vest armor article and comfort for the user of the pectoral covering vest armor article. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Numerous references are attached teaching various ballistic vest articles and NPL document is attached teaching the widely known and conventional nature of various detachable fasteners. These references establish the general state of the prior art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT H MUROMOTO JR whose telephone number is (571)272-4991. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 730-1730. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alissa Tompkins can be reached at 571-272-3425. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT H MUROMOTO JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588725
Visor Board For Use With Headgear Brim
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582554
WELDING PROTECTION DEVICE WITH HAPTIC SENSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569016
BODY ENERGY BALANCE ASSEMBLY EMPLOYING EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD AND ASSOCIATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569018
DEVICES, METHOD AND KITS FOR REDUCING TRANSMISSION OF FECAL PATHOGENS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12559871
SHEDDING MACHINE FOR A LOOM AND SHEDDING ASSEMBLY FOR A LOOM COMPRISING A GROUP OF SUCH MACHINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
56%
With Interview (-10.8%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1332 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month