Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/917,233

LIGHT-EMITTING MODULE AND SMARTPHONE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Examiner
CHIANG, MICHAEL
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Nichia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
281 granted / 401 resolved
+2.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
412
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.8%
+7.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 401 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I in the reply filed on 11/21/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 2 and 14 have been withdrawn from consideration Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zeng, US 2019/0107272 A1. Regarding claim 1, Zeng discloses “A light-emitting module comprising: a substrate (83, Fig. 8); a light source (84, Fig. 8) disposed on the substrate; an electronic component (821, Fig. 8) disposed on the substrate and separated from the light source (seen in Fig. 8); and a first light-transmissive member comprising a first lens (802, Fig. 8) and a first support (801, Fig. 8), and covering the light source and the electronic component (seen in Fig. 8), the first support supporting the first lens and comprising a light diffusing substance (¶ [0094] “The lightshade may be provided with a diffusion layer or an opaque portion above the input terminal structure 821, so as to cover the input terminal structure 821”), wherein a light diffusivity of the first support is higher than a light diffusivity of the first lens (the center portion is transparent, the side portion has a diffusion layer (¶ [0094]), and the first lens overlaps the light source and the first support overlaps the electronic component in a top view (seen in Fig. 8; ¶ [0042]).” Regarding claim 6, Zeng discloses the invention of claim 1, as cited above, and further discloses “the first support overlaps an outer edge of a light emission region of the light source in the top view (seen in Fig. 8, the lampshade is diffusive, and the inner housing is reflective (¶ [0094], thus the first support overlaps an outer edge of the light emission region) .” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zeng in view of Kuhn et al., US 2013/0285081 A1. Regarding claim 3, Zeng discloses the invention of claim 1, as cited above, except “the first support comprises the light diffusing substance inside the first support”. Zeng is silent with regards to the diffusing substance location, and only teaches a diffusion layer (¶ [0094]) but not its specific location with respect to the lens suport. Kuhn discloses an optical element (3, Fig. 1B) where the optical altering materials can be introduced into the layer or on the top or bottom (¶ [0010] “The optical element may be formed of a plane parallel plate, into which reflective or absorptive materials have been introduced or which is provided with such materials on one or two major sides”). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to have the diffusing materials, as taught by Zeng, be incorporated into the layer, such as taught by Kuhn. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to have the diffusive material in the layer for selecting a desired location for the diffusive material in completing the details of the invention. Regarding claim 4, Zeng in view of Kuhn discloses the invention of claim 3, as cited above, and further discloses “the first lens and the first support constitute a formed body in which the first lens and the first support are bonded to each other at an interface between the first lens and the first support (Zeng, seen in Fig. 8, bonded together at interface between 801 and 802).” Regarding claim 5, Zeng in view of Kuhn discloses the invention of claim 4, as cited above, and further discloses “at the interface between the first lens and the first support, the first lens comprises a first joining portion and the first support comprises a second joining portion fitted to the first joining portion (Zeng, seen in Fig. 8, the two are fitted together in shape). Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zeng in view of Okahisa et al., US 2020/0073075 A1. Regarding claim 7, Zeng discloses the invention of claim 1 as cited above, except “the first support comprises an annular projection on at least one of an upper surface or a lower surface of the first support.” Okahisa discloses a lens with support with annular projections (21c, Fig. 1 and 3) on the upper and lower surface of the support. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to include annular projections, such as taught by Okahisa, to the lens support, as taught by Zeng. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to include annular projections for emitting light in a desired direction, such as parallel (Okahisa, ¶ [0058-0059]). Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zeng in view of Kiba et al., US 2022/0146074 A1. Regarding claim 8, Zeng discloses the invention of claim 1 as cited above, except “the first lens is a biconvex lens, and a distance between a surface of the first lens on a light source side and the light source increases as a distance from an optical axis of the first lens increases. Kiba discloses a light module with a lens with support, and the lens (11, Fig. 1B) is a biconvex lens (¶ [0056]) where a distance between a surface of the first lens on a light source side and the light source increases as a distance from an optical axis of the first lens increases (seen in Fig. 2). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to have the lens, as taught by Zeng be a biconvex lens, such as taught by Kiba. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to have the lens be a biconvex lens for selecting an appropriate lens type for emitting a desired light output. Claim(s) 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zeng in view of Yoshida et al., US 2022/0316683 A1. Regarding claim 10, Zeng discloses the invention of claim 1 as cited above, except “ the light source comprises at least one light-emitting part, which comprises: a light-emitting element, a wavelength conversion member disposed above the light-emitting element, and a covering member covering a lateral surface of the light-emitting element and a lateral surface of the wavelength conversion member. Yoshida discloses a light source device with a lens and a support, and the light emitter (12AB, Fig. 1B, 2C) has a wavelength conversion member (11AB, Fig. 1B, 2C) on top and a covering member (13, Fig. 1B, 2C) covering a lateral surface of the light emitting element and the wavelength conversion member. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to include a wavelength conversion member and covering member, such as taught by Yoshida, to the light emitter, as taught by Zeng. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to add a wavelength conversion member on top for emitting a desired wavelength and converting more of the light (Yoshida, ¶ [0100]), and add a covering member for guiding the light emitted toward a predetermined direction (Yoshida, ¶ [0107]). Regarding claim 11, Zeng discloses the invention of claim 1, as cited above, except “the light source comprises a plurality of light-emitting parts, each light-emitting part comprising: a light-emitting element, and a wavelength conversion member disposed above the light-emitting element, and the light-emitting module further comprises a covering member that integrally holds the light-emitting elements and the wavelength conversion members and covers lateral surfaces of the light-emitting elements and lateral surfaces of the wavelength conversion members.” Yoshida discloses a light source device with a lens and a support, and the light emitters (12AB, Fig. 1B, 2C) has wavelength conversion members (11AB, Fig. 1B, 2C) on top and a covering member (13, Fig. 1B, 2C) covering a lateral surface of the light emitting element and the wavelength conversion member. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to include a plurality of light emitters and wavelength conversion members and covering member, such as taught by Yoshida, to the light source, as taught by Zeng. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to add a plurality of light emitters for emitting more light, a wavelength conversion member on top for emitting a desired wavelength and converting more of the light (Yoshida, ¶ [0100]), and add a covering member for guiding the light emitted toward a predetermined direction (Yoshida, ¶ [0107]). Claim(s) 12 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zeng in view of Yamamoto et al., US 2020/0343422 A1. Regarding claim 12, Zeng discloses the invention of claim 1, as cited above, except “the light-emitting module is a flash light source.”’ Yamamoto discloses a light emitting device as a flash module (¶ [0003, 0030]). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to have the flash light source, as taught by Yamamoto, use a light source device of claim 1, such as taught by Zeng. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to use a light source device of Zeng for concealing the electrical modules (Zeng, ¶ [0092]). Regarding claim 13, Zeng discloses the invention of claim 1, as cited above, except “A smartphone comprising: the light-emitting module of claim 1.” Yamamoto discloses a light emitting device as a flash module in a smartphone (¶ [0003, 0030]). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to have the smartphone light source, as taught by Yamamoto, use a light source device of claim 1, such as taught by Zeng. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to use a light source device of Zeng for concealing the electrical modules (Zeng, ¶ [0092]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 9 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 9 recites, inter alia, “A light-emitting module comprising: a substrate; a light source disposed on the substrate; an electronic component disposed on the substrate and separated from the light source; and a first light-transmissive member comprising a first lens and a first support, and covering the light source and the electronic component, the first support supporting the first lens and comprising a light diffusing substance, wherein a light diffusivity of the first support is higher than a light diffusivity of the first lens, and the first lens overlaps the light source and the first support overlaps the electronic component in a top view” and “a second light-transmissive member comprising a second lens, and a second support that supports the second lens, wherein: the second lens overlaps the first lens in the top view, the first support overlaps the substrate in the top view, at least a portion of the second support is located outward of the substrate in the top view, and a light diffusivity of the second support is higher than the light diffusivity of the first lens.” The references of record do not teach or suggest the aforementioned limitations, nor would it be obvious to modify those references to include such limitations. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yoshida et al., US 2022/0252241 A1 discloses a light source with a lens on a support Fournier et al., US 2016/0337564 A1 discloses a smartphone with flash and adjustable diffusion Begley et al., US 2015/0292686 A1 discloses a light device with outer shell with portions of different diffusivity for concealing electronics Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL CHIANG whose telephone number is (571)270-3811. The examiner can normally be reached M to F, 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James R Greece can be reached at 571-272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL CHIANG/Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2875 /TRACIE Y GREEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601463
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL LIGHT SPOT SIZE ADJUSTMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601462
OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR A LIGHTING DEVICE WITH A COLLIMATING LENS WITH A WELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595893
PLANAR ILLUMINATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595894
LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12578079
COLOR-CHANGING LAMPSHADE AND LAMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+22.4%)
1y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 401 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month