Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/917,348

Delivery of Content and Priority Messages

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Examiner
JOHNSON-CALDERON, FRANK J
Art Unit
2425
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Comcast Cable Communications LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allow Rate
127 granted / 222 resolved
-0.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
243
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
67.1%
+27.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 222 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-24 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 18, 20-25, 45, 53, 60-63, 66, 71, 79-80 of U.S. Patent No. 12155911. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the subject matter claimed in the instant application is fully disclosed in the patent and thus is anticipated by the patent. For example, note the following relationship between the instant application claim 1 and patented claim 1 (examiner note: similarities to the patented claims have been underlined.). Instant Application Claims Patent No. 12155911 Claims Claim 1 A method comprising: receiving, by a computing device, a signal indicating that a user device has started to receive a high priority communication message, wherein the high priority communication message comprises first content for output by the user device; causing, by the computing device and based on the signal, pausing of sending second content, to the user device, at a location in the second content; and causing, by the computing device and based on information contained in the high priority communication message, resuming the sending of the second content from the location in the second content. Claim 1 A method comprising: sending, by a computing device and to a user device, first content; receiving, by the computing device, a first signal indicating that the user device has started to receive a high priority communication message, wherein the high priority communication message comprises second content for output by the user device; pausing, by the computing device and based on the first signal, the sending of the first content at a location in the first content; and resuming, by the computing device and based on information contained in the high priority communication message, the sending of the first content from the location in the first content. Using a similar analysis as above claims the following claims have been found to recite similar subject matter: Instant Application Claims Patent No. 10368142 Claims Claim(s) 2 Claim 2 Claim(s) 3 Claim 4 Claim(s) 4 Claim 9 Claim(s) 5 Claim 10 Claim(s) 6 Claim 18 Claim(s) 7 Claim 20 Claim(s) 8 Claim 21 Claim(s) 9 Claim 22 Claim(s) 10 Claim 23 Claim(s) 11 Claim 24 Claim(s) 12 Claim 25 Claim(s) 13 Claim 6 Claim(s) 14 Claim 8 Claim(s) 15 Claim 45 Claim(s) 16 Claim 62 Claim(s) 17 Claim 53 Claim(s) 18 Claim 60 Claim(s) 19 Claim 61 Claim(s) 20 Claim 63 Claim(s) 21 Claim 66 Claim(s) 22 Claim 71 Claim(s) 23 Claim 79 Claim(s) 24 Claim 80 Regarding claims 1-24 of the instant application, they correspond to the of claims of patent 12155911 except the terms “first content” and “second content” are swapped, which does not affect the scope of the invention (e.g., in one first content is primary content and second content is EAS content and in the other first content is EAS content and second content is primary content.) Therefore, instant application 18917348 and Patent 12155911 are not patentably distinct from each other because they recite similar subject matter which is obvious over one another. Claims 1-24 are further rejected on the grounds of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10368142 and claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10638204. Although the claims are not identical, the subject matter of the 10368142 patent and 10638204 patent mirrors that of the instant Application and of the 12155911 patent outlined above (where it is noted that both the 10638204 and 12155911 patents are subject to a Terminal Disclaimer with respect to the 10368142 patent.) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Velazquez et al. (US 20100138858) – (¶0011) encoding an emergency alert message; displaying the multimedia program and the emergency alert message, wherein the emergency alert message overlays a portion of the multimedia program; and receiving a user input for temporarily stopping the displaying of the emergency alert message, wherein in response to the user input, the multimedia program is displayed without the emergency alert message. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FRANK J JOHNSON whose telephone number is (571)272-9629. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00AM-5:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian T. Pendleton can be reached on 571-272-7527. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Frank Johnson/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2425
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597262
DETECTING AND IDENTIFYING OBJECTS REPRESENTED IN SENSOR DATA GENERATED BY MULTIPLE SENSOR SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583386
METHOD FOR DETECTING TARGET PEDESTRIAN AROUND VEHICLE, METHOD FOR MOVING VEHICLE, AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575718
UNIVERSAL ENDOSCOPE ADAPTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574588
Image Selection Using Motion Data
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573219
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR COUNTING AND IDENTIFICATION OF BACTERIAL COLONIES USING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+20.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 222 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month