Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 14, 2026
Application No. 18/917,778

SELF-ADJUSTING SHOCK-ABSORPTION DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Priority
Oct 17, 2023 — CN 202322796497X
Examiner
VIEAUX, GARY C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tilta Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
562 granted / 711 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
72.3%
+32.3% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 711 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Amendment The Response, filed on May 26, 2026, has been received and made of record. In response to the Non-Final Office Action dated April 24, 2026, claims 1, 2, 5, have been amended, no claims have been cancelled, and claims 12 and 13 have been newly added. Response to Amendment Regarding the 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 8, 10 and 11, Applicant submits that “claim 1 has been amended to incorporate a portion of claim 5 that recites allowable subject matter according to the Office.” (Remarks, p. 8). The Examiner notes that only a portion of claim 5 was amended into claim 1, and the amendment did not include the subject matter of intervening claims 2-4. In light of the amendments to the claim, Applicant's arguments have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Chinese Patent Application No. 109798422 to Zhou. Regarding claim 1, Zhou teaches a self-adjusting shock-absorption device, comprising a movable frame (e.g., fig. 3, at least portions of elements 14 and 18; the Examiner notes that the “movable frame” is not required or recited to be a singularly formed, monolithic structure) configured to rotate along at least one pivot (e.g., fig. 3, via pivot of element 171), the movable frame comprises a four-link assembly that comprises a first arm (e.g., fig. 3, portion of element 18 contacting left portion of element 10), a second arm (e.g., fig. 3, portion of element 18 contacting right portion of element 10), a third arm (e.g., fig. 3, portion of element 14 contacting left portion of element 10), and a fourth arm (e.g., fig. 3, portion of element 14 contacting left portion of element 10), and a shock-absorption mechanism, comprising an adjusting component (e.g., fig. 3, unlabeled element attaching element 16 to elements 18 and 171) and an elastic component (e.g., fig. 3, element 16), the adjusting component comprises a first adjusting member (e.g., fig. 3, unlabeled element attaching element 16 to element 171; the Examiner notes that the claim does not require any additional elements or members of the adjusting component), wherein the elastic component is provided within the four-link assembly (e.g., fig. 3), with a first end of the elastic component connected to the first adjusting member (e.g., fig. 3, unlabeled element attaching element 16 to elements 18 and 171), wherein a first end of the first adjusting member (e.g., fig. 3, such as the left side of the unlabeled element attaching element 16 to elements 18 and 171) is movably connected to the movable frame four-link assembly (e.g., fig. 3), and wherein the first adjusting member is configured to change a length of the elastic component in response to a rotation of the four-link assembly (e.g., fig. 3, through static hold/control by first adjusting member and resulting stretch of elastic component in response to vertical rotation). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 12 and 13 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claims 12 and 13, the prior art has not been found by the Examiner to teach or fairly suggest the claimed combination of a self-adjusting shock-absorption device, comprising a movable frame configured to rotate along at least one pivot, the movable frame comprises a four-link assembly that comprises a first arm, a second arm, a third arm, and a fourth arm, and a shock-absorption mechanism, comprising an adjusting component and an elastic component, the adjusting component comprises a second adjusting member, wherein a first end of the second adjusting member is movably connected to the elastic component, a second end of the second adjusting member is movably connected to is movably connected to the third arm, and a third end of the second adjusting member is movably connected to is movably connected to the third arm, and wherein the second adjusting member is configured to change a length of the elastic component in response to a rotation of the four-link assembly. The closest references explicitly fail to teach wherein an adjusting component comprises a second adjusting member, wherein a first end of the second adjusting member is movably connected to an elastic component, a second end of the second adjusting member is movably connected to is movably connected to a third arm, and a third end of the second adjusting member is movably connected to is movably connected to the third arm, and wherein the second adjusting member is configured to change a length of the elastic component in response to a rotation of a four-link assembly. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY C VIEAUX whose telephone number is (571)272-7318. The examiner can normally be reached Increased Flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached at 571-272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY C VIEAUX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677082
IMAGING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669686
CAMERA MODULE WITH REFLECTIVE AND REFRACTIVE MEMBER AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671899
CONTROL APPARATUS, IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665994
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS, LENS APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666132
USER INTERFACES INTEGRATING HARDWARE BUTTONS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+8.6%)
2y 6m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 711 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month