Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/917,935

SENSORED FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL IN A POWER TOOL

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Priority
Oct 20, 2023 — provisional 63/591,860 +1 more
Examiner
BOUZIANE, SAID
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
448 granted / 582 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
598
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 582 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement filed on 10/23/2024, 04/10/2025 and 01/28/2026 has been considered. An initialed copy of form 1449 is enclosed herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9, 14- 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. The claims recite the limitation “determine a first feed forward term and a second feed forward term based on a signal from a stator current sensor and the output signals from the one or more position sensors.” It’s not clear how the feed forward term is configured while incorporating signals from the sensors as feedback terms; thus, rendering the claims indefinite, because the claims includes elements and functions not actually disclosed (those encompassed by feed forward term), thereby rendering the claims confusing, vague, and indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1- 6, 9- 15 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nakahara et al. (WO 2021100843 A1) Re. claims 1, 10 and 15, Nakahara discloses a power tool/method (Figs. 1 and 2) comprising: a housing (tool housing); a brushless motor (15) disposed in the housing, the brushless motor including a rotor (13) and a stator (14), the rotor is coupled to a motor shaft arranged to rotate about a longitudinal axis (output shaft 16), the longitudinal axis extending through the motor shaft, the motor shaft arranged to produce a rotational output to a drive mechanism (23); one or more position sensors (motor rotation measuring unit 27) disposed adjacent to the brushless motor (15), the one or more position sensors configured to generate output signals corresponding to a rotational position of the brushless motor (signal 𝜃1); a power switching circuit (inverter circuit 51) configured to provide a supply of power from a battery pack (32) to the brushless motor (15); and an electronic controller (control unit 4) connected to the one or more position sensors (27) and the power switching circuit (51), the electronic controller configured to implement field-oriented control (“FOC”) of the brushless motor (magnetic field components d-axis and q-axis), the electronic controller configured to: receive the output signals from the one or more position sensors (signal 𝜃1), determine a parameter of the brushless motor based on the output signals from the one or more position sensors (𝜃1 and ω1), determine drive parameters (duty cycle CVu1, CVv1 and Cvw1 control signal of the control unit 4 to the inverter circuit 51) for the brushless motor (15) based on the parameter (𝜃1 and ω1) of the brushless motor using FOC (vector control ¶. [0013]), generate drive commands (cid1 and ciq1) based on the drive parameters (ω1), and drive the brushless motor (15) based on the drive commands (cid1 and ciq1). Re. claim 2, Nakahara discloses wherein the parameter of the brushless motor includes at least one of a rotational position, a speed, or an acceleration (optional embodiments, they do not limit the scope of the claim) of the brushless motor (𝜃1 and ω1). Re. claim 3, Nakahara discloses wherein the drive parameter of the brushless motor is a plurality of duty cycles for each phase of the motor (duty cycle CVu1, CVv1 and Cvw1 control signal of the control unit 4 to the inverter circuit 51). Re. claims 4, 11 and 18, Nakahara discloses wherein the electronic controller (4) is further configured to: generate, with a speed regulator (speed control unit 42) and the output signals from the one or more position sensors (ω1), a current command (cid1 and ciq1). Re. claims 5, 12 and 19, Nakahara discloses wherein the electronic controller is further configured to: determine a rotor speed (ω1) based on the output signals from the one or more position sensors (𝜃1); and generate a current command using a speed regulator (a speed control unit 42), the current command (cid1 and ciq1) based on the rotor speed (ω1) and a target speed (cω1). Re. claims 6, 13 and 19, Nakahara ¶. [0049]- [0062] and fig. 3 describe the operating modes and the switching conditions. Re. claims 9 and 14, Nakahara Fig. 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7 and 8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 16 and 17 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAID BOUZIANE whose telephone number is (571)272-7592. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 6:00-15:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at Colon-Santana. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAID BOUZIANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700820
POWER TOOL AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700818
MOTOR DRIVE SYSTEM FOR A HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689317
MIXED CHEMISTRY BATTERY PACK POWER TRANSFER USING A MULTILEVEL T-TYPE INVERTER
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683524
Control method for braking an electric motor, control method for controlling an electric drive unit and computer program product
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676565
POSITION CONTROL OF MECHANICALLY PARALLELED ELECTRICAL DRIVES WITHOUT INTERCOMMUNICATION BUSES
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 582 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month