Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/917,973

SPLIT-TYPE MICROPOROUS DIRECT-INJECTION AROMA THERAPY MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Priority
Feb 05, 2024 — CN CN202410164293.0
Examiner
SPAMER, DONALD R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Foshan Nanhai Keri Electronic Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
339 granted / 573 resolved
-0.8% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
599
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
§112
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 573 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in China on 2/5/2024. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the Chinese application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee (US 2022/0314264). With regards to claim 1, Lee teaches a split-type microporous direct-injection aromatherapy machine, comprising a base (104), a shell (106) and an atomizing module (102) arranged between the base and the shell (partially inside both), wherein a connecting mechanism (upper part of 104 with notch) is arranged on the base, and the shell and the base are connected with each other through the connecting mechanism (bottom part of 106 with notch/post; also connect using these through the atomizer 102 which sits on the base); and the base is provided with a slot (opening at top of 104 with a shelf near 118/120 where the atomizing module 102 goes in and sits on), and the atomizing module is detachably inserted into the slot (removable); the atomizing module is electrically connected with the base (using connectors 118 and 120; para [0035])), and the shell can cover a lower part of the atomizing module (covers most of the atomizer and includes covering a lower part when the lower part is so defined as a part that is covered); (fig 2 and 5; abstract). With regards to claim 2, the atomizing module includes a liquid storage bottle (110) and a liquid guide tube (111) that is positioned below and communicated with the bottle (supplies the liquid to the outlet); the base comprises an upper mounting stand (upper compartment of 104 with the slot opening), the slot is arranged in the upper mounting stand (opening at top), and the liquid guide tube can be inserted into the slot (into 108 which sits in the slot) (fig 2). With regards to claim 3, the liquid guide tube comprises a connecting part (upper part of 102 with threads) and a liquid guide part (bottom part of tube 111) which are connected with each other; the liquid guide part protrudes from a side of the connecting part (bottom side), and the connecting part is communicated with the interior of the liquid guide part (connects bottle to tube to outlet); an inner wall of the connecting part is provided with an internal thread (see fig 2), a bottle mouth of the liquid storage bottle is provided with an external thread (see fig 2 showing threads), and the liquid storage bottle is screwed into the connecting part through the external thread (fig 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art is Lee as discussed above. With regards to claim 4, Lee does not teach the snap ring arrangement as claimed. There is no teaching or motivation to arrive at the claimed arrangement within the claim environment. Wit regards to claim 5, Lee does not teach the claimed arrangement of components. There is no teaching or motivation to arrive at the claimed arrangement within the claim environment. Claims 6-8 depend on claim 4 and are indicated for at least the same reasons. With regards to claim 9, Lee teaches the shell (106) and the base (104) with the upper mounting stand both individually attach to the atomizing module (102). This allows the shell to move between an open dispensing position (when protrusion 154 is in groove 156) to a closed position (when in groove 158) while the atomizer remains firmly seated in the base (see corresponding ridges and grooves at bottom of 102/top of 104; fig 5). Claim 9 differs in that it requires the shell directly attaching to the base via protrusion and grooves. This would not allow the taught open and closing function of Lee. There is no teaching or motivation to arrive at the claimed arrangement within the claim environment. Claim 10 depends from claim 9 and is indicated for at least the same reasons. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DONALD R SPAMER whose telephone number is (571)272-3197. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday from 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Marcheschi can be reached at (571)272-1374. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DONALD R SPAMER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734262
IN-VEHICLE STERILIZATION SYSTEM
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729167
Systems, Methods, and Apparatus for Converting a Biosolid to an Enhanced Cylindrical Class A Fertilizer
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714760
STERILIZATION DEVICE
6y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12691187
FAST HARMLESS TREATMENT DEVICE FOR HAZARDOUS FLEXIBLE MATERIAL
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12678002
VACUUM EXHAUST DEODORIZER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+32.2%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 573 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month