Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/918,091

Method, Apparatus and Device for Determining Boundary of Wireless Fence Based on Progressive Distance Triggering

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 17, 2024
Examiner
WONG, KIN C
Art Unit
2689
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Shenzhen Paileji Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
922 granted / 1100 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1121
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§102
57.2%
+17.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1100 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) (1-10) is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a-1) as being anticipated by Jones (9280559). Regarding claim 8: Jones discloses an apparatus for determining the boundary of a wireless fence/(geofence/rf zoning/range/rf fence) based on progressive distance triggering, wherein the apparatus is a wireless fence product for a pet (as depicted in figure 4 of Jones and see associated descriptions for details, and col. 8, lines 21-36 of Jones) and comprises: a distance detection module used for detecting a real-time distance between a target device and a central point of a wireless fence according to a distance detection period, wherein at least two concentric circles are set with the central point of the wireless fence as a center, and each circle denotes a range radius (col. 14, lines 40-48 of Jones); an action level updating module used for triggering and generating a new device action level when the real-time distance is updated, wherein the new device action level corresponds to the range radius (col. 17, lines 49-60 of Jones); one device action level is set between a minimum range radius and the central point, one device action level is set between every two adjacent range radii, and one device action level is set beyond a maximum range radius (col. 18, lines 4-12 of Jones); the device action levels are in positive correlation with the range radius (col. 18, lines 4-12 of Jones); a state determination module used for determining where there is a current device action that is being performed at present, wherein the current device action corresponds to a current device action level, and one device action level corresponds to one device action (col. 22, lines 24-29 of Jones); the device actions corresponding to the device action levels comprise no action, a sound warning, a sound and vibration warning, and a sound, vibration and current warning in a descending order of an intensity level (col. 18, line 53 to col. 19, line 2 of Jones); and an action performing module used for comparing the new device action level with the current device action level when there is a current device action that is being performed at present, and stopping performing the current device action, not performing a new action and marking the current device action level as the new device action level when the new device action level is lower than the current device action level (col. 18, line 53 to col. 19, line 2 of Jones). Thus, Jones disclosed geofencing for pet/animal thereof. Regarding claim 9: Jones discloses a wireless fence, comprising a processor, a memory, a communication interface and a communication bus, wherein the processor, the memory and the communication interface communicate with each other by means of the communication bus; the memory is used for storing at least one executable instruction, and the executable instruction instructs the processor to perform operations of the method for determining the boundary of a wireless fence based on progressive distance triggering according to any one of claims 1-7 (col. 20, lines 5-28 of Jones). Regarding claim 10: Jones discloses a computer-readable storage medium, wherein at least one executable instruction is stored in the storage medium, and when the executable instruction runs on a device for determining the boundary of a wireless fence based on progressive distance triggering, the device for determining the boundary of a wireless fence based on progressive distance triggering performs operations of the method for determining the boundary of a wireless fence based on progressive distance Abhyanker (8874489), Ehrman et al (11330803), Lazarevic (10863718) and Womble et al (10049278) are cited for geofence boundary managements. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to K. Wong whose telephone number is (571) 272-7566. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, D. Goins can be reached at (571) 272-2957. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K. WONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2689
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602960
RETAIL SECURITY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586433
PACKAGE HAND-OVER APPARATUS, PACKAGE HAND-OVER METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585332
HAPTIC SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586431
SECURE ACCESS TO TRAILER CONNECTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579855
DOOR LOCK WITH LOWER POWER STATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1100 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month