Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/918,600

CONFIGURATION OF CONTROL CHANNELS IN A MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Oct 17, 2024
Priority
Jan 09, 2007 — EU 07000351.2 +9 more
Examiner
SHIVERS, ASHLEY L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
549 granted / 631 resolved
+27.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
655
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.1%
+11.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 12,156,234, hereinafter referred to as ‘234. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the instant application and those of ‘234 are similar in scope. Regarding claim 1, ‘234 teaches an integrated circuit for controlling a receiving entity comprising: receiving circuitry, which, in operation, receives control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and control circuitry, which is coupled to the receiving circuitry and which, in operation, performs a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 2, ‘234 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 3, ‘234 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 4, ‘234 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 3, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Clam 4). Regarding claim 5, ‘234 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 6, ‘234 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim 6). Regarding claim 7, ‘234 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 7). Regarding claim 8, ‘234 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 8). Regarding claim 9, ‘234 teaches a process controlled by an integrated circuit, the process comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 10, ‘234 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 11, ‘234 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 12, ‘234 further teaches the process according to claim 11, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 4). Regarding claim 13, ‘234 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 14, ‘234 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim 6). Regarding claim 15, ‘234 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein a receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 7). Regarding claim 16, ‘234 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 8). Regarding claim 17, ‘234 teaches a non-transitory computer-readable medium having contents which cause processing circuitry to perform a method, the method comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 18, ‘234 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 19, ‘234 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 20, ‘234 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 19, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 4). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 10,595,308, hereinafter referred to as ‘308. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the instant application and those of ‘308 are similar in scope. Regarding claim 1, ‘308 teaches an integrated circuit for controlling a receiving entity comprising: receiving circuitry, which, in operation, receives control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and control circuitry, which is coupled to the receiving circuitry and which, in operation, performs a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 2, ‘308 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 3, ‘308 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 4, ‘308 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 3, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Clam 4). Regarding claim 5, ‘308 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 6, ‘308 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim6). Regarding claim 7, ‘308 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 7). Regarding claim 8, ‘308 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 8). Regarding claim 9, ‘308 teaches a process controlled by an integrated circuit, the process comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 9), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 9), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 9). Regarding claim 10, ‘308 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 210). Regarding claim 11, ‘308 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 11). Regarding claim 12, ‘308 further teaches the process according to claim 11, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 12). Regarding claim 13, ‘308 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 13). Regarding claim 14, ‘308 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim 14). Regarding claim 15, ‘308 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein a receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 15). Regarding claim 16, ‘308 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 16). Regarding claim 17, ‘308 teaches a non-transitory computer-readable medium having contents which cause processing circuitry to perform a method, the method comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 18, ‘308 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 19, ‘308 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 20, ‘308 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 19, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 4). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 9,338,792, hereinafter referred to as ‘792. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the instant application and those of ‘792 are similar in scope. Regarding claim 1, ‘792 teaches an integrated circuit for controlling a receiving entity comprising: receiving circuitry, which, in operation, receives control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and control circuitry, which is coupled to the receiving circuitry and which, in operation, performs a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 2, ‘792 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 3, ‘792 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 4, ‘792 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 3, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Clam 33). Regarding claim 5, ‘792 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 4). Regarding claim 6, ‘792 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 7, ‘792 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 6). Regarding claim 8, ‘792 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 7). Regarding claim 9, ‘792 teaches a process controlled by an integrated circuit, the process comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 10, ‘792 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 11, ‘792 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 12, ‘792 further teaches the process according to claim 11, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 13, ‘792 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 4). Regarding claim 14, ‘792 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 15, ‘792 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein a receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 6). Regarding claim 16, ‘792 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 7). Regarding claim 17, ‘792 teaches a non-transitory computer-readable medium having contents which cause processing circuitry to perform a method, the method comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 18, ‘792 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 19, ‘792 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 20, ‘792 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 19, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 3). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 9,986,550, hereinafter referred to as ‘550. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the instant application and those of ‘792 are similar in scope. Regarding claim 1, ‘550 teaches an integrated circuit for controlling a receiving entity comprising: receiving circuitry, which, in operation, receives control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and control circuitry, which is coupled to the receiving circuitry and which, in operation, performs a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 2, ‘550 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 3, ‘550 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 4, ‘550 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 3, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Clam 4). Regarding claim 5, ‘550 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 6, ‘550 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 7, ‘550 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 10). Regarding claim 8, ‘550 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 11). Regarding claim 9, ‘550 teaches a process controlled by an integrated circuit, the process comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 10, ‘550 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 11, ‘550 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 12, ‘550 further teaches the process according to claim 11, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 4). Regarding claim 13, ‘550 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 14, ‘550 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 15, ‘550 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein a receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 6). Regarding claim 16, ‘550 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 7). Regarding claim 17, ‘550 teaches a non-transitory computer-readable medium having contents which cause processing circuitry to perform a method, the method comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 18, ‘550 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 19, ‘550 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 20, ‘550 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 19, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 4). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 9,648,606, hereinafter referred to as ‘606. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the instant application and those of ‘792 are similar in scope. Regarding claim 1, ‘606 teaches an integrated circuit for controlling a receiving entity comprising: receiving circuitry, which, in operation, receives control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and control circuitry, which is coupled to the receiving circuitry and which, in operation, performs a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 2, ‘606 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 3, ‘606 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 4, ‘606 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 3, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Clam 3). Regarding claim 5, ‘606 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 4). Regarding claim 6, ‘606 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry, in operation, performs the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 7, ‘606 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 6). Regarding claim 8, ‘606 further teaches the integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 7). Regarding claim 9, ‘606 teaches a process controlled by an integrated circuit, the process comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 10, ‘606 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 11, ‘606 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 12, ‘606 further teaches the process according to claim 11, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 3). Regarding claim 13, ‘606 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is configured by one or both of dedicated control information and common control information, which are transmitted from the transmitting entity (See Claim 4). Regarding claim 14, ‘606 further teaches the process according to claim 9, comprising: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements that is dynamically configured per subframe (See Claim 5). Regarding claim 15, ‘606 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein a receiving entity is a user equipment (UE) (See Claim 6). Regarding claim 16, ‘606 further teaches the process according to claim 9, wherein the transmitting entity is a base station (See Claim 7). Regarding claim 17, ‘606 teaches a non-transitory computer-readable medium having contents which cause processing circuitry to perform a method, the method comprising: receiving control information in one or more control information formats, from a transmitting entity, via a physical control channel mapped to one or more control channel elements (CCEs), wherein one CCE consists of 36 resource elements (See Claim 1), and performing a detection of the physical control channel (See Claim 1), wherein the physical control channel is formed of a number of coded control information bits, the number being an integer (N) multiple of a defined smallest number of coded control information bits and corresponding to the one or more CCEs, wherein N equals a number of the one or more CCEs, and at least two of the control information formats are associated with different numbers of information bits (See Claim 1). Regarding claim 18, ‘606 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of resource elements on which the control information can be mapped (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 19, ‘606 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 17, wherein the method comprises: performing the detection of the physical control channel on a subset of the control information formats (See Claim 2). Regarding claim 20, ‘606 further teaches the non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 19, wherein the subset of the control information formats is configured based on a MIMO transmission mode (See Claim 3). Conclusion Any response to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Hand delivered responses should be brought to: Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASHLEY L SHIVERS whose telephone number is (571)270-3523. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag Shah can be reached at 571-272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASHLEY SHIVERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477 9/30/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772151
CELL CONFIGURATION SCHEMES IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763800
FULL DUPLEX INTERFERENCE MANAGEMENT BASED ON SIDELINK CHANNEL REPORTS
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757143
COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SIGNALING IN NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORKS
4y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750736
CONTROL APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745103
MULTIBEAM NON-GEOSYNCHRONOUS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION WITHOUT ON-BOARD WAVEFORM PROCESSING
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 9m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month