Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/918,645

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK AUTHORIZATION OF HOME USER EQUIPMENT AND VISITING USER EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 17, 2024
Priority
Jan 06, 2022 — continuation of 12/150,206
Examiner
DIABY, MOUSTAPHA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
T-Mobile USA Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
521 granted / 622 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
641
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.2%
+16.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 622 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Application, submitted on 10/17/2024, has been received, entered, and made of record. Currently, claims 1-20 remain pending in the application. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/17/2024 was filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner as indicated. However, Applicant has not provided an explanation of relevance of cited document(s). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 4, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Meirosu et al. (hereinafter referred to as Meirosu, US 2021/0091994 A1). Referring to claim 1, Meirosu discloses a method comprising: receiving communication context (fig.1, smart contract 125) from a home distributed ledger node (fig.1, blockchain) in a home network (fig.1, home network 105) and storing the communication context in a visited distributed ledger node (fig.1, blockchain) in a visited network (visited network 103), wherein the home distributed ledger node and the visited distributed ledger node (fig.1, blockchain) comprise a distributed ledger that is shared by the home network and the visited network (fig.1, [0005], and [0038]-[0039]) (Note: the visited network implements smart contract (communication context), accessed from home network, in a blockchain (distributed ledger node) of the visited network; wherein the home network and the visited network share a blockchain (distributed ledger node)); to serve a User Equipment (UE) (fig.1, UE 101) that is visiting from the home network, retrieving the communication context for the home network from the visited distributed ledger node and exchanging network signaling with the home network based on the communication context ([0038]-[0040] and [0046]-[0050]) (Note: to serve UE 101 that is visiting from the home network, the visited network refers to the smart contract associated with the user of the UE 101, in the blockchain, to determine the terms of servicing these transmissions or signaling and exchanges network signaling with the home network); and delivering a wireless data service to the UE that is visiting from the home network in response to the network signaling (fig.2B and [0051]-[0052]) (Note: the UE 101 begins to utilize the resources of the visited network 103 in the same manner as it would operate in the home network 105 based network signaling with the home network). Referring to claim 2, Meirosu discloses the method of claim 1 wherein exchanging the network signaling with the home network based on the communication context comprises authenticating the UE that is visiting from the home network ([0042]-[0043] and [0051]) (Note: exchanging the network signaling with the home network based on the communication context comprises identifying (authenticating) the UE that is visiting from the home network). Referring to claim 4, Meirosu discloses the method of claim 1 wherein delivering the wireless data service comprises: transferring session signaling to a wireless access node (fig.1, RAN 155) based on the network signaling; and wirelessly exchanging user data between the wireless access node and the UE that is visiting from the home network in response to the session signaling to deliver the wireless data service ([0036] and [0051]) (Note: The visited network includes a RAN 155 through which the UE 101 communicates with a visited operator core network (voCN) 159, wherein the UE 101 can utilize 231 the resources of the visited network 103 in the same manner as it would operate in the home network 105). Referring to claim 19, the same ground of rejection provided for claim 1 is applicable herein. Meirosu further discloses a network control system to exchange session signaling with a wireless access node (fig.1, RAN 155) based on the network signaling; and the wireless access node to exchange the session signaling with the network control system and wirelessly exchange user data with the visiting UE to deliver a wireless data service ([0036] and [0051]) (Note: The visited network includes a RAN 155 through which the UE 101 communicates with a visited operator core network (voCN) 159, wherein the UE 101 can utilize 231 the resources of the visited network 103 in the same manner as it would operate in the home network 105). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Meirosu in view of Cook et al. (hereinafter referred to as Cook, US 2009/0282251 A1). Referring to claim 3, Meirosu discloses the method of claim 1, except wherein exchanging the network signaling with the home network based on the communication context comprises authorizing the wireless data service for the UE that is visiting from the home network. However, in the same field of endeavor, Cook discloses a concept wherein exchanging the network signaling with the home network based on the communication context comprises authorizing the wireless data service for the UE that is visiting from the home network ([0079]) (Note: the home network may receive a second service request from the visited network for the mobile station to establish a data service requiring a cryptographic key. The home network determines that a cryptographic key for the mobile station is available at the home network and grants the service request to the mobile station 916). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention by the applicant to modify the method of Meirosu with the concept of Cook to obtain the claimed invention. The suggestion/motivation for doing so would have been to prevent unauthorized access to a service. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C.102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Salkintzis (US 2023/0216852 A1). Referring to claim 18, Salkintzis discloses a method comprising: a security function (fig.2, visited AAA function 215) in a visited network (fig.2, visited network 130) receiving communication context from a home network (fig.2, home network 140) over a distributed ledger (fig.2, blockchain network 164) ([0042]-[0045]); a network function exchanging user signaling with a User Equipment (UE) (fig.2, UE 205) that is visiting from the home network to authenticate and authorize the UE; the network function exchanging network signaling with the security function to authenticate and authorize the UE (fig.2 and [0052]); the security function using the communication context to exchange the network signaling with the home network to authenticate and authorize the UE ([0095]-[0097]) (Note: the VAF, using the smart contract, to exchange the network signaling with the home network to authenticate and authorize the UE); in response to the authentication and authorization, the network function exchanging session signaling with the UE and with a wireless access node (fig.1, access network 120) to deliver a wireless data service to the UE; and the wireless access node receiving the session signaling, and in response, wirelessly exchanging user data with the UE to deliver the wireless data service to the UE ([0097]-[0098]) (Note: Upon successful authentication, the HAF 220 sends an AAA Accept message to the VAF 215, which forward the AAA Accept message to the access network 120 (see signaling 565). The access network 120 transmits a success indication (e.g., an EAP-Success message) to the UE 205. After successful authentication, the UE 205 is connected to the access network 120 and gains access to services in the visited network 130). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-17 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOUSTAPHA DIABY whose telephone number is (571)270-1669. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ABDERRAHIM MEROUAN can be reached at (571) 270-5254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOUSTAPHA DIABY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2683
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707331
NETWORK SESSION PROCESSING BASED ON SLICE LOAD
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707262
METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR AUTHENTICATION USING A USER EQUIPMENT IDENTIFIER
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701411
ACCESS STRATUM SECURITY ANCHOR FOR A WIRELESS NETWORK SERVICE SECURITY ARCHITECTURE
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689958
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROGRAMMABLE AND CUSTOMIZED INTELLIGENCE FOR TRAFFIC STEERING IN 5G NETWORKS USING OPEN RAN ARCHITECTURES
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684332
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEAMLESS MOBILE PLAN SIGNUP AND ACTIVATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 0m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 622 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month