Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/918,875

DROP CHIME SET

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Oct 17, 2024
Priority
Oct 17, 2023 — provisional 63/590,954
Examiner
LOCKETT, KIMBERLY R
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
None recorded (individual inventor: Mindee K. Mohr)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
986 granted / 1195 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1232
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1195 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The phrase “causing each child of the group of children to retrieve the respective at lease on drop chime provided to that child and thereafter to again drop the provided at least one drop chime in the predetermined sequence to play the desired melody again” is vague and fails to disclose the applicant’s invention. Causing a human to make a selection does not constitute a patentable invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over. Goecking (DE 29500179 U1 ) Regarding claim 9, Goecking discloses a drop sound set, comprising: a plurality of balls (5); wherein each of the plurality of drop balls (5) is configured to emit a sound having a musical note when dropped onto a hard surface (the groove) such that when dropped in a pre-determined sequence the drop chimes play a desired melody (see paragraph 0005). Goecking does not disclose the use of a chime. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to modify the device as disclosed in Goecking to include a chime, since the use of chimes producing specific desired sounds in conventional and well known in the art. Regarding claim 10-14, Goecking does not disclose specific hollow shapes or cross sections. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to modify the device as disclosed in Goecking to specific hollow shapes and sounds since the use of hollow shapes and specific cross sections are a matter of design choice and are conventional and well known in the art. Regarding claims 15-18 , Goecking does not disclose the specific use of indicia or colors. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to modify the device as disclosed in Goecking to include a chime, since the use of chimes and percussion device with colors and indica is a well known means of teaching music. Claims 1-8 are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLY R LOCKETT whose telephone number is (571)272-2067. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached at 571-270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIMBERLY R LOCKETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763042
Bent Steel Saddle for S-Style Guitar
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12749468
ELECTRONIC DRUM STAND
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12731562
IMPEDANCE VARIATOR FOR A WIND INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725587
PLECTRUM WITH FOAM PAD ADHESIVE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718782
ACCESSORY TRAY FOR MUSIC INSTRUMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.1%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1195 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month