Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/920,052

METHOD FOR REPORTING SENSING RESULT, SENSING-BY-PROXY INITIATOR AND SENSING-BY-PROXY RESPONDER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 18, 2024
Priority
Apr 26, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022089415
Examiner
MADDOX, MICHAEL WAYNE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
97%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 97% — above average
97%
Career Allowance Rate
32 granted / 33 resolved
+37.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -7% lift
Without
With
+-6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
54
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 33 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5, 8, 12, 15, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Dong (US 2025/0175837 A1)(hereinafter “Dong ‘837”). Regarding claim 1, Dong ‘837 discloses a method for reporting a sensing result, applicable to a sensing-by-proxy initiator (Abstract: a communication method for sensing by proxy (SBP), includes: receiving, by an access point (AP), a first SBP request frame from an SBP requesting station, wherein the first SBP request frame comprises a requirement for requesting the AP to initiate a first sensing measurement as a proxy AP), the method comprising: receiving a sensing-by-proxy report frame or a sensing-by-proxy report frame set from a sensing-by-proxy responder, wherein the sensing-by-proxy report frame or the sensing-by-proxy report frame set carries the sensing result (Fig. 7, [0072]: in step 730, the AP may send a message frame to the SBP requesting STA. In an embodiment of this disclosure, the message frame may include a sensing measurement setup ID for the SBP request frame. In other words, according to some embodiments of this disclosure, before sending the message frame, the AP may send a sensing measurement setup request frame to the responder according to the requirement of sensing measurement, where the sensing measurement setup request frame may include the sensing measurement setup ID allocated to the responder. [0075]: according to some embodiments of this disclosure, the message frame in step 730 may be a sensing measurement report frame. For example, when the AP completes the sensing measurement setup with the proper responder and completes the sensing measurement process, it may carry the sensing measurement setup ID while reporting the sensing measurement result to the SBP requesting STA.). Regarding claim 5, Dong ‘837 discloses all features of claim 1 as outlined above. Dong ‘837 also discloses: transmitting an mth sensing-by-proxy report request frame to the sensing-by-proxy responder, wherein the mth sensing-by-proxy report request frame carries a terminate indication, wherein the terminate indication instructs the sensing-by-proxy responder to terminate a sensing measurement upon report of frame data corresponding to an mth sensing-by-proxy report frame (an alternative limitation not given mapping in the claims); transmitting a first sensing-by-proxy termination frame to the sensing-by-proxy responder, wherein the first sensing-by-proxy termination frame instructs the sensing-by-proxy responder to terminate all or part of or at least one of sensing measurements established by the sensing-by-proxy responder on behalf of the sensing-by-proxy initiator ([0065]: Fig. 6, [0066]: in S66, the SBP AP may send a termination frame to the SBP STA, where the termination frame may indicate termination of the sensing measurement for the first SBP request frame.); or receiving a second sensing-by-proxy termination frame transmitted by the sensing-by-proxy responder, wherein the second sensing-by-proxy termination frame instructs the sensing-by-proxy initiator to terminate all or part of or at least one of sensing measurements established by the sensing-by-proxy responder on behalf of the sensing-by-proxy initiator (Fig. 5, [0055]: in step 540, the AP may send a termination frame to the SBP requesting STA. For example, the AP may send the termination frame to the SBP requesting STA if the sensing measurement setup is not completed with a proper responder in step 530. In other words, in case the AP has not set up a sensing measurement that meets the requirement of sensing measurement in the SBP request frame, the AP may send the termination frame to the SBP requesting STA, where the termination frame may indicate termination of the SBP process corresponding to the SBP request frame. [0076]: the communication method shown in FIG. 7 may further include: in case that the AP does not set up a sensing measurement meeting the requirement of sensing measurement, the AP may send a termination frame to the SBP requesting STA, where the termination frame indicates termination of the SBP process corresponding to the SBP request frame.). Regarding claim 8, Lim discloses a sensing-by-proxy initiator (Abstract: a communication method for sensing by proxy (SBP), includes: receiving, by an access point (AP), a first SBP request frame from an SBP requesting station, wherein the first SBP request frame comprises a requirement for requesting the AP to initiate a first sensing measurement as a proxy AP), comprising: a processor and a memory storing at least one program, which when executed by the processor, causes the sensing-by-proxy initiator to ([0008]: according to an exemplary embodiment of this disclosure, an electronic device is provided. The electronic device includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor. The processor is configured to, upon executing the computer program, implement the method as described above.): receive a sensing-by-proxy report frame or a sensing-by-proxy report frame set from a sensing-by-proxy responder, wherein the sensing-by-proxy report frame or the sensing-by-proxy report frame set carries a sensing result (Fig. 7, [0072]: in step 730, the AP may send a message frame to the SBP requesting STA. In an embodiment of this disclosure, the message frame may include a sensing measurement setup ID for the SBP request frame. In other words, according to some embodiments of this disclosure, before sending the message frame, the AP may send a sensing measurement setup request frame to the responder according to the requirement of sensing measurement, where the sensing measurement setup request frame may include the sensing measurement setup ID allocated to the responder. [0075]: according to some embodiments of this disclosure, the message frame in step 730 may be a sensing measurement report frame. For example, when the AP completes the sensing measurement setup with the proper responder and completes the sensing measurement process, it may carry the sensing measurement setup ID while reporting the sensing measurement result to the SBP requesting STA.). Regarding claim 12, Dong ‘837 discloses all features of claim 8 as outlined above. Dong ‘837 also discloses wherein the at least one program, which when executed by the processor, causes the sensing-by-proxy initiator to: transmit an mth sensing-by-proxy report request frame to the sensing-by-proxy responder, wherein the mth sensing-by-proxy report request frame carries a terminate indication, wherein the terminate indication instructs the sensing-by-proxy responder to terminate a sensing measurement upon report of frame data corresponding to an mth sensing-by-proxy report frame (an alternative limitation not given mapping in the claims); transmit a first sensing-by-proxy termination frame to the sensing-by-proxy responder, wherein the first sensing-by-proxy termination frame instructs the sensing-by-proxy responder to terminate all or part of or at least one of sensing measurements established by the sensing-by-proxy responder on behalf of the sensing-by-proxy initiator ([0065]: Fig. 6, [0066]: in S66, the SBP AP may send a termination frame to the SBP STA, where the termination frame may indicate termination of the sensing measurement for the first SBP request frame.); or receive a second sensing-by-proxy termination frame transmitted by the sensing-by-proxy responder, wherein the second sensing-by-proxy termination frame instructs the sensing-by-proxy initiator to terminate all or part of or at least one of sensing measurements established by the sensing-by-proxy responder on behalf of the sensing-by-proxy initiator (Fig. 5, [0055]: in step 540, the AP may send a termination frame to the SBP requesting STA. For example, the AP may send the termination frame to the SBP requesting STA if the sensing measurement setup is not completed with a proper responder in step 530. In other words, in case the AP has not set up a sensing measurement that meets the requirement of sensing measurement in the SBP request frame, the AP may send the termination frame to the SBP requesting STA, where the termination frame may indicate termination of the SBP process corresponding to the SBP request frame. [0076]: the communication method shown in FIG. 7 may further include: in case that the AP does not set up a sensing measurement meeting the requirement of sensing measurement, the AP may send a termination frame to the SBP requesting STA, where the termination frame indicates termination of the SBP process corresponding to the SBP request frame.). Regarding claim 15, Dong ‘837 discloses a sensing-by-proxy responder (Fig. 1, [0034]), comprising: a processor and a memory storing at least one program, which when executed by the processor, causes the sensing-by-proxy responder to ([0008]: according to an exemplary embodiment of this disclosure, an electronic device is provided. The electronic device includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor. The processor is configured to, upon executing the computer program, implement the method as described above.): transmit a sensing-by-proxy report frame or a sensing-by-proxy report frame set to a sensing-by-proxy initiator, wherein the sensing-by-proxy report frame or the sensing-by-proxy report frame set carries a sensing result ((Fig. 7, [0072]: in step 730, the AP may send a message frame to the SBP requesting STA. In an embodiment of this disclosure, the message frame may include a sensing measurement setup ID for the SBP request frame. In other words, according to some embodiments of this disclosure, before sending the message frame, the AP may send a sensing measurement setup request frame to the responder according to the requirement of sensing measurement, where the sensing measurement setup request frame may include the sensing measurement setup ID allocated to the responder. [0075]: according to some embodiments of this disclosure, the message frame in step 730 may be a sensing measurement report frame. For example, when the AP completes the sensing measurement setup with the proper responder and completes the sensing measurement process, it may carry the sensing measurement setup ID while reporting the sensing measurement result to the SBP requesting STA.)). Regarding claim 18, Dong ‘837 discloses all features of claim 15 as outlined above. Dong ‘837 also discloses wherein the at least one program, which when executed by the processor, further causes the sensing-by-proxy responder to: receive an mth sensing-by-proxy report request frame from the sensing-by-proxy initiator, wherein the mth sensing-by-proxy report request frame carries a termination indication, wherein the termination indication instructs the sensing-by-proxy responder to terminate a sensing measurement upon report of frame data corresponding to an mth sensing-by-proxy report frame (an alternative limitation not given mapping in the claims); or receive a first sensing-by-proxy termination frame from the sensing-by-proxy initiator, wherein the first sensing-by-proxy termination frame instructs the sensing-by-proxy responder to terminate all or part of or at least one of sensing measurements established by the sensing-by-proxy responder on behalf of the sensing-by-proxy initiator ([0065]: Fig. 6, [0066]: in S66, the SBP AP may send a termination frame to the SBP STA, where the termination frame may indicate termination of the sensing measurement for the first SBP request frame.); or transmit a second sensing-by-proxy termination frame to the sensing-by-proxy initiator, wherein the second sensing-by-proxy termination frame instructs the sensing-by-proxy initiator to terminate all or part of or at least one of sensing measurements established by the sensing-by-proxy responder on behalf of the sensing-by-proxy initiator (Fig. 5, [0055]: in step 540, the AP may send a termination frame to the SBP requesting STA. For example, the AP may send the termination frame to the SBP requesting STA if the sensing measurement setup is not completed with a proper responder in step 530. In other words, in case the AP has not set up a sensing measurement that meets the requirement of sensing measurement in the SBP request frame, the AP may send the termination frame to the SBP requesting STA, where the termination frame may indicate termination of the SBP process corresponding to the SBP request frame. [0076]: the communication method shown in FIG. 7 may further include: in case that the AP does not set up a sensing measurement meeting the requirement of sensing measurement, the AP may send a termination frame to the SBP requesting STA, where the termination frame indicates termination of the SBP process corresponding to the SBP request frame.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3, 9-10, and 16, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dong ‘837 in view of Trainin et al (US 2023/0009140 A1)(hereinafter “Trainin”). Regarding claim 2, 9, and 16, Dong ‘837 discloses all features of claims 1, 8, and 15 as outlined above. Dong ‘837 also discloses wherein the sensing-by-proxy report frame carries a piece of frame data [0075]: according to some embodiments of this disclosure, the message frame in step 730 may be a sensing measurement report frame. For example, when the AP completes the sensing measurement setup with the proper responder and completes the sensing measurement process, it may carry the sensing measurement setup ID while reporting the sensing measurement result to the SBP requesting STA.). Dong ‘837 does not disclose wherein the piece of frame data is a medium access control management protocol data unit (MMPDU), and the piece of frame data comprises partial data of one measurement result in the sensing result, or all data of the one measurement result, or data of at least two measurement results. However, Trainin discloses wherein the piece of frame data is a medium access control management protocol data unit (MMPDU), and the piece of frame data comprises partial data of one measurement result in the sensing result, or all data of the one measurement result, or data of at least two measurement results [0111]: one of the STAs 804 may operate as the initiator device and use the AP 802 as a proxy to obtain measurement reports from the other STAs 804. For example, in some aspects, a first STA 804 may operate as the initiator device, the second and third STAs 804 may operate as responder devices, and the AP 802 may operate as a proxy for the first STA 804. [0062]: the payload 204 may include a PSDU including a data field (DATA) 214 that, in turn, may carry higher layer data, for example, in the form of medium access control (MAC) protocol data units (MPDUs) or an aggregated MPDU (A-MPDU). [0070]: the frame control field specifies the frame type, for example, a data frame, a control frame, or a management frame.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to send or receive the sensing-by-proxy report frame or the sensing-by-proxy report frame set carrying the sensing result, as taught by Dong ‘837, in which the frame data is a MMPDU unit, as taught by Trainin. Doing so allows for communication between the SBP initiator and the SBP responder to conform the IEEE 802.11 stand to provide for greater interoperability between communication system elements (See Trainin [0079].). Regarding claims 3 and 10, Dong ‘837 in view of Trainin discloses all features of claims 2 and 9 as outlined above. Dong ‘837 does not disclose wherein in a case that at least two pieces of the frame data carry data belonging to a same measurement result, the at least two pieces of the frame data belong to a same aggregate medium access control protocol data unit (A-MPDU). However, Trainin discloses wherein in a case that at least two pieces of the frame data carry data belonging to a same measurement result, the at least two pieces of the frame data belong to a same aggregate medium access control protocol data unit (A-MPDU) ([0062]: the payload 204 may include a PSDU including a data field (DATA) 214 that, in turn, may carry higher layer data, for example, in the form of medium access control (MAC) protocol data units (MPDUs) or an aggregated MPDU (A-MPDU). [0069]: FIG. 4 shows an example PPDU 400 usable for communications between an AP 102 and a number of STAs 104. As described herein, each PPDU 400 includes a PHY preamble 402 and a PSDU 404. Each PSDU 404 may carry one or more MAC protocol data units (MPDUs). For example, each PSDU 404 may carry an aggregated MPDU (A-MPDU) 408 that includes an aggregation of multiple A-MPDU subframes 406. Each A-MPDU subframe 406 may include a MAC delimiter 410 and a MAC header 412 prior to the accompanying MPDU 414, which comprises the data portion (“payload” or “frame body”) of the A-MPDU subframe 406.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to send or receive the sensing-by-proxy report frame or the sensing-by-proxy report frame set carrying the sensing result, as taught by Dong ‘837, in which the frame data is an A-MPDU unit, as taught by Trainin. Doing so allows for greater efficiency for communication between the SBP initiator and the SBP responder by providing for transmitting of multiple measurement results within the same frame. Claims 4, 11, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dong ‘837 in view of Dong (US 2025/0031079 A1)(hereinafter “Dong ‘079’). Regarding claim 4, Dong ‘837 discloses all features of claim 1 as outlined above. Doug ‘837 also discloses transmitting a sensing-by-proxy request frame to the sensing-by-proxy responder (Fig. 7, [0070]: in step 710, the AP may receive an SBP request frame from the SBP requesting STA, where the SBP request frame may include a requirement for requesting the AP to initiate sensing measurement as a proxy AP.). Doug ‘837 does not disclose wherein the sensing-by-proxy request frame carries a requested frequency of the sensing result. However, Dong ‘079 discloses wherein the sensing-by-proxy request frame carries a requested frequency of the sensing result (Fig. 1, [0049]: in step 101, a sensing session establishment initiation message frame sent by an initiator is received. [0069]: in some embodiments, the sensing session establishment initiation message frame includes first parameter information, and the first parameter information includes at least one of the following: [0070]: …period information…. [0071]: the period information indicates the measurement period information of WLAN sensing measurement. Examiner submits that the period information parameter indicative of a measurement period of the WLAN sensing measurement is equivalent to the claimed requested frequency of the sensing result.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to transmit a sensing-by-proxy request frame to the sensing-by-proxy responder, as taught by Dong ‘837, wherein the sensing-by-proxy request frame carries a requested frequency of the sensing result, as taught by Dong ‘079. Doing so allows for more efficient utilization of network resources by providing for scheduling of the sensing measurement at determined intervals. Regarding claim 11, Dong ‘837 discloses all features of claim 8 as outlined above. Doug ‘837 also discloses wherein the at least one program, which when executed by the processor, causes the sensing-by-proxy initiator to: transmit a sensing-by-proxy request frame to the sensing-by-proxy responder (Fig. 7, [0070]: in step 710, the AP may receive an SBP request frame from the SBP requesting STA, where the SBP request frame may include a requirement for requesting the AP to initiate sensing measurement as a proxy AP.). Doug ‘837 does not disclose wherein the sensing-by-proxy request frame carries a requested frequency of the sensing result. However, Dong ‘079 discloses wherein the sensing-by-proxy request frame carries a requested frequency of the sensing result (Fig. 1, [0049]: in step 101, a sensing session establishment initiation message frame sent by an initiator is received. [0069]: in some embodiments, the sensing session establishment initiation message frame includes first parameter information, and the first parameter information includes at least one of the following: [0070]: …period information…. [0071]: the period information indicates the measurement period information of WLAN sensing measurement. Examiner submits that the period information parameter indicative of a measurement period of the WLAN sensing measurement is equivalent to the claimed requested frequency of the sensing result.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to transmit a sensing-by-proxy request frame to the sensing-by-proxy responder, as taught by Dong ‘837, wherein the sensing-by-proxy request frame carries a requested frequency of the sensing result, as taught by Dong ‘079. Doing so allows for more efficient utilization of network resources by providing for scheduling of the sensing measurement at determined intervals. Regarding claim 17, Dong ‘837 discloses all features of claim 15 as outlined above. Doug ‘837 also discloses wherein the at least one program, which when executed by the processor, further causes the sensing-by-proxy responder to: receive a sensing-by-proxy request frame from the sensing-by-proxy initiator (Fig. 7, [0070]: in step 710, the AP may receive an SBP request frame from the SBP requesting STA, where the SBP request frame may include a requirement for requesting the AP to initiate sensing measurement as a proxy AP.). Doug ‘837 does not disclose wherein the sensing-by-proxy request frame carries a requested frequency of the sensing result. However, Dong ‘079 discloses wherein the sensing-by-proxy request frame carries a requested frequency of the sensing result (Fig. 1, [0049]: in step 101, a sensing session establishment initiation message frame sent by an initiator is received. [0069]: in some embodiments, the sensing session establishment initiation message frame includes first parameter information, and the first parameter information includes at least one of the following: [0070]: …period information…. [0071]: the period information indicates the measurement period information of WLAN sensing measurement. Examiner submits that the period information parameter indicative of a measurement period of the WLAN sensing measurement is equivalent to the claimed requested frequency of the sensing result.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to receive a sensing-by-proxy request frame from the sensing-by-proxy initiator, as taught by Dong ‘837, wherein the sensing-by-proxy request frame carries a requested frequency of the sensing result, as taught by Dong ‘079. Doing so allows for more efficient utilization of network resources by providing for scheduling of the sensing measurement at determined intervals. Claims 6-7, 13-14, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dong ‘837 in view of Zhang et al (US 2022/0263758 A1)(hereinafter “Zhang”). Regarding claims 6, 13, and 19, Dong ‘837 discloses all features of claims 1, 8, and 15 as outlined above. Zhang does not disclose wherein the sensing-by-proxy report frame carries a More Cached Report indicating bit, wherein the more cached report indicating bit indicates whether more cached measurement result data needs to be transmitted upon transmission of frame data in an element. However, Zhang discloses wherein the sensing-by-proxy report frame carries a More Cached Report indicating bit, wherein the more cached report indicating bit indicates whether more cached measurement result data needs to be transmitted upon transmission of frame data in an element (Fig. 7, [0246]: Zhang discloses an extension header including a reserved flag field associated with a cache index. The cache index is used to carry an identifier of the cache entry. A length of a cache index is 4 bytes. The cache index may be set when a third flag is set to 1. The cache index may be set to 0 if a third flag is default. [0245]: a length of the third flag may be 1 bit. Accordingly, Zhang discloses a frame that includes a flag of 1 bit that indicates that cached data needs to be transmitted.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to receive or transmit a sensing-by-proxy report frame from the sensing-by-proxy initiator, as taught by Dong ‘837, wherein the more cached report indicating bit indicates whether more cached measurement result data needs to be transmitted upon transmission of frame data in an element, as taught by Zhang. Doing so provides for indicating to the sensing-by-proxy initiator that additional cached measurements are available to be received providing for improved network reliability (see Zhang [0006]). Regarding claim 7, 14, and 20, Dong ‘837 discloses all features of claims 1, 8, and 15 as outlined above. Dong ‘837 does not disclose wherein the sensing-by-proxy report frame carries a report index, wherein the report index indicates a corresponding index of frame data in an element in a cache of the sensing-by-proxy responder. However, Zhang discloses wherein the sensing-by-proxy report frame carries a report index, wherein the report index indicates a corresponding index of frame data in an element in a cache of the sensing-by-proxy responder (Fig. 7, [0246]: Zhang discloses an extension header including a reserved flag field associated with a cache index (“a report index”). The cache index is used to carry an identifier of the cache entry. Accordingly, Zhang discloses a frame that includes a cache index that indicates that a corresponding index of cached data. [0485] The identifier of the first cache entry is used to uniquely identify the first cache entry in a cache of the first proxy node. The identifier of the first cache entry may include a cache index of the first cache entry, and the cache index is used to identify the first cache entry on an interface board of the first proxy node.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to receive or transmit a sensing-by-proxy report frame from the sensing-by-proxy initiator, as taught by Dong ‘837, wherein the sensing-by-proxy report frame carries a report index, wherein the report index indicates a corresponding index of frame data in an element in a cache of the sensing-by-proxy responder, as taught by Zhang. Doing so provides for identifying the cached data to sensing-by-proxy initiator providing for improved network stability, reliability, and robustness (see Zhang [0042]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lim et al. (US 20240049135 A1) – Improved Sensing Procedure – discloses a sensing frame format for communication between an initiator and a responder for performing WLAN sensing. Du et al. (US 20250024386 A1) – Information Transmission Method and Apparatus – discloses a sensing by proxy procedure using a sensing measurement report frame. Hu et al. (US 20240357675 A1) – Measurement Setup Identifier Determining Method and Related Apparatus – discloses that a requesting station requests an AP as a proxy of the requesting station to perform sensing measurement. Suh et al. (US 20230300657 A1) – Sensing Measurement Report Frame Format – discloses transmitting, by an access point or station, a request for a measurement report using a sensing measurement report frame format that includes a category field, a public action field, and at least one measurement set-up identifier field and at least one sensing measurement report element. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL W MADDOX whose telephone number is (571)272-5834. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30am-5:00pm, 1st F 7:30am-4:00pm, 2nd F off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Asad M Nawaz can be reached at 571-272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL WAYNE MADDOX/Examiner, Art Unit 2463 /CHI TANG P CHENG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12720577
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12681122
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ACQUIRING ANGLE OF DEPARTURE (AOD) OF TERMINAL, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676715
METHOD FOR UL WAVEFORM SWITCHING WITH GROUP COMMON DCI
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12652555
MEASUREMENT GAP PRE-CONFIGURATION PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12648002
DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL MONITORING CAPABILITY INDICATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
97%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (-6.7%)
2y 7m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 33 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month