Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/920,061

SELF-POWERED, SELF-PROPELLED COMPUTER GRID WITH LOOP TOPOLOGY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 18, 2024
Examiner
KONG, SZE-HON
Art Unit
3657
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Lone Gull Holdings Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
392 granted / 603 resolved
+13.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
627
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 603 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 5, 7-9, and 11-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Davoodi et al. (US 2015/0345726 A1) and Page (US 2011/0057448 A1). For claim 1, Davoodi discloses a production network, comprising: a plurality of floating wave motion to electrical energy converters deployable at a surface of an ocean (Fig. 2, 3, abstract), a navigation system in communication with, and configured to establish positions for, the plurality of floating wave motion to electrical energy converters across the surface of the ocean (Para. 0009, 0010, 0047, 0048, 0055, 0150, where the navigation system receives location from the communication system); and a propulsion system cooperating with said navigation system to propel the plurality of floating wave motion to electrical energy converters to positions established by the navigation system (Para. 0017, 0018, 0080, 0083, 0144, where the navigation system operate the propulsion system to commanded positions). Davoodi does not specifically disclose each said floating wave motion to electrical energy converter having a chemical synthesizing apparatus that is powered by electrical energy converted from wave motion, and configured to produce a chemical through a chemical reaction; and a dedicated vessel for collecting a portion of the chemical and delivering to a remote location. Page in the same field of the art discloses each said floating wave motion to electrical energy converter having a chemical synthesizing apparatus that is powered by electrical energy converted from wave motion, and configured to produce a chemical through a chemical reaction; and a dedicated vessel for collecting a portion of the chemical and delivering to a remote location (Para. 0029, 0076, 0114, 0115, where the energy converters synthesizing at least hydrogen through electrolysis process and a transport vessel can collect and deliver the chemical to land). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present claimed invention to modify the invention of Davoodi to have each said floating wave motion to electrical energy converter having a chemical synthesizing apparatus that is powered by electrical energy converted from wave motion, and configured to produce a chemical through a chemical reaction; and a dedicated vessel for collecting a portion of the chemical and delivering to a remote location, as taught by Page to harvest additional types of energy and collect the energy for use at different locations. For claim 4, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, wherein the navigation system is located on land (Para. 0009, where the operations can be controlled by remote centralized system on land). For claim 5, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, wherein the propulsion system comprises a water jet (Para. 0017, propulsion may be water jet). For claim 7, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, wherein the propulsion system comprises a propeller (Para. 0017, propulsion may be propellers). For claim 8, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1 wherein the propulsion system comprises a rigid sail (Para. 0020, propulsion may be sails). For claim 9, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1 wherein the chemical is hydrogen (Para. 0029, 0076, 0114, 0115, where the energy converters synthesizing at least hydrogen through electrolysis process). For claim 11, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, wherein the dedicated vessel is adapted to collect, store, transport, and offload hydrogen gas (Page - para. 0029, 0076, 0114, 0115, where the energy converters synthesizing at least hydrogen through electrolysis process and a transport vessel can collect and deliver the chemical to land). For claim 12, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, wherein the dedicated vessel is adapted to collect, store, transport, and offload hydrogen gas (Page - para. 0029, 0076, 0114, 0115, where the energy converters synthesizing at least hydrogen through electrolysis process and a transport vessel can collect and deliver the chemical to land), but does not explicitly disclose the vessel is adapted to collect, store, transport and offload liquified ammonia. However, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to prepare the vessel taught by Page to be ready for collect, store, transport and offload any known types of elements, in gas or liquid form and achieve the same and expected result. For claim 13, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, wherein the vessel is autonomous (Para. 0009, 0019, 0037, 0055, 0057, 0073). Claim(s) 2 and 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Davoodi et al. (US 2015/0345726 A1) and Page (US 2011/0057448 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Carroll et al. (6,768,216). For claim 2, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, but does not specifically disclose one of the plurality of floating wave motion to electrical energy converters comprises an oscillating water column. Carroll in the same field of the art discloses one of the plurality of floating wave motion to electrical energy converters comprises an oscillating water column (Fig. 2-4, abstract, col. 1, ln 21-35, col. 2, ln 9-26, col. 7, ln 8-21). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present claimed invention to modify the invention of Davoodi to configure one of the plurality of floating wave motion to electrical energy converters comprises an oscillating water column, as taught by Carroll to employ the known method for harvesting wave energy from the ocean. For claim 3, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, wherein one of the plurality of floating wave motion to electrical energy converters comprises a water-filled tube having an inner wall defining a constriction that is adapted to accelerate water moving within the water-filled tube (Carroll - Fig. 2-4, abstract, col. 1, ln 21-35, col. 2, ln 9-26, col. 7, ln 8-21). Claim 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Davoodi et al. (US 2015/0345726 A1) and Page (US 2011/0057448 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of McIntee (US 2013/0168489 A1). For claim 6, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, but does not explicitly disclose the propulsion system comprises a ducted fan. However, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to employ any known type of propulsion system for motive power for the water vehicles. Even so, McIntee discloses a multifunction vehicle that includes a ducted fan for propulsion (Fig. 1, para. 0009). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present claimed invention to modify the invention of Davoodi to employ ducted fan as propulsion system, as taught by McIntee to select desire types of propulsion system for the vehicles. Claim 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Davoodi et al. (US 2015/0345726 A1) and Page (US 2011/0057448 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Kambara et al. (US 2018/0009661A1). For claim 10, Davoodi, as modified, discloses the chemical production network of Claim 1, but does not explicitly disclose the chemical is ammonia. However, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art any known types of chemicals may be produced based on the teachings of Page using any well-known chemical production methods that would achieve predicted results. Kambara discloses the well-known method of ammonia production using chemical reactions using hydrogen and nitrogen (At least in abstract, para. 0002-0005, 0012). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present claimed invention to modify the invention of Davoodi and produce ammonia as a product, as taught by Kambara for appropriate and energy usage. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. (US 2012/0267949 A1) Sharon et al. discloses a wave energy harvesting transport vessel system that harvest and transport energy to land. (US 2011/0281478 A1) Blumenthal discloses a ship propulsion system that harvest energy and produce hydrogen. (US 2012/0325290 A1) Gizara discloses an ocean power plant that produces energy and hydrogen. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sze-Hon Kong whose telephone number is (571)270-1503. The examiner can normally be reached 9 AM-5 PM Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abby Lin can be reached at (571) 270-3976. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SZE-HON KONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589739
METHOD FOR MONITORING A LANE CHANGE OF A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583449
DRIVER ASSISTANCE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MAINTAINING AND COMPENSATING BRAKING TORQUE IN ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583461
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING DRIVER BEHAVIOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576818
Method and System for Enhanced Braking in a Tractor Unit
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576846
VEHICLE INCREMENTAL MOVEMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+14.8%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 603 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month