Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/920,121

DENTAL IMPLANT, COMPONENT FOR DENTAL APPLICATIONS, IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR DENTAL APPLICATIONS, METHOD FOR FORMING A PROTECTIVE LAYER ON THE SURFACE OF AN IMPLANTABLE OR IMPLANT COMPONENT, IMPLANTABLE OR IMPLANT COMPONENT HAVING A PROTECTIVE LAYER, AND USE OF A PROTECTIVE LAYER

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 18, 2024
Examiner
NELSON, MATTHEW M
Art Unit
3772
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nobel Biocare Services AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
497 granted / 860 resolved
-12.2% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
906
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.7%
+2.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 860 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 28, 29, 33, 35, and 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 28 recites the limitation "the isoelectric point" in line 2. Claim 29 recites “the total of all alkaline” in line 3. Claim 35 recites “the free surface energy” in line 2. Claim 37 recites “the density” in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 33 recites “an implantable or implant component”, however this limitation has already been established in claim 24 from which it depends. It is unclear if this is meant to refer to the same component or a different component. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 24-38, 40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Denzer (US 2009/0132048). Denver shows a method of forming a protective layer on a surface of an implantable or implant component (abstract), the method comprising a) applying a solution on the surface of the component ([0028] describes the application), the solution having a pH at 25°C of 6.8 or less ([0014] discusses many possible combinations of cations and anions including sodium chloride and sodium nitrate which have pHs of approximately 6.24 and 6 in the disclosed concentration of 0.1M of [0028], respectively); and b) drying the applied solution to form a protective layer on the surface of the component for dental applications ([0028]-[0029] describes the drying step). With respect to claim 25, wherein the solution comprises monovalent inorganic cations other than H+ and H30+ ([0014]) and comprises monovalent, bivalent or trivalent inorganic anions (anions listed in [0014]). With respect to claim 26, wherein the monovalent inorganic cations comprise Na+, K+, or NH4+ ([0014] discloses Na+ and K+ for instance). With respect to claim 27, wherein the solution comprises inorganic bivalent cations ([0014] “bivalent cations”). With respect to claim 28, wherein the pH of the solution at 25°C is below the isoelectric point of the surface on which the protective layer is to be formed, and/or wherein the pH of the solution is 6.5 or less (pH is 6.5 or less as described in regards to claim 24). With respect to claim 29, wherein the solution comprises sodium cations (Na+), and the sodium cations form 30 - 100 mol% of the total of all alkaline and earth alkaline metal cations in the solution ([0013]-[0014] describe the use of a single salt so that the mol% of cations would be 100%, or less in combinations of salts), and wherein the solution comprises phosphate ([0014]), hydrogen phosphate and/or dihydrogen phosphate anions, and the phosphate, hydrogen phosphate and/or dihydrogen phosphate anions form 30 mol% or more of the total of all inorganic anions ([0013]-[0014] describe the use of a single salt so that the mol% of anions would be 100%, or less in combinations of salts). With respect to claim 30, wherein the solution comprises magnesium ions ([0014] discloses inclusion of magnesium [Mg]). With respect to claim 31, wherein the solution does not contain calcium ions ([0014] lists many salt compositions that do not contain calcium ions). With respect to claim 32, wherein the solution has a total concentration of inorganic salts of 1 to 200 mM ([0028] for instance discusses use of 0.01M to 1M, which is equivalent to 10 mM to 1000M; also discusses use of 0.1M which is equivalent to 100mM). With respect to claim 33, wherein the protective layer protects an implantable or implant component during storage against contamination ([0009]). With respect to claim 34, wherein the protective layer preserves the hydrophilicity of the implantable or implant component during storage ([0016]), in that the implantable or implant component exhibits a water contact angle of 0 - 30 both prior to the applying the solution and after rinsing the component with water at 25°C for 2 minutes, followed by the drying ([0003] discusses the range of contact angle for hydrophilic materials such as titanium, and since [0011] discusses no residue left and that the layer prevents compounds in the air from altering the hydrophilicity of the underlying material). With respect to claim 35, further comprising increasing the free surface energy of the implantable or implant component prior to or simultaneous with the applying the solution (hydrophilic surfaces are categorized by high surface energy, so the cleaning of [0027] prior to coating will remove the organic/carbon deposits and increase the surface energy/hydrophilicity). With respect to claim 36, wherein the protective layer preserves an amount of available functional groups of the surface of the implantable or implant component during storage ([0016] discusses how the protective layer protects the ions of the surface). With respect to claim 37, wherein the protective layer is configured to reduce carbon deposition and preserve hydrophilicity and/or the density of free/unbound hydroxyl groups on the surface of the implantable or implant component during dry storage as compared to storage without said protective layer ([0016] discusses this protection from organic/carbon compounds). With respect to claim 38, wherein the implantable or implant component is a dental implant or an abutment (abstract). With respect to claim 40, wherein the implantable or implant component is made from metal or metal alloy ([0001]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW NELSON whose telephone number is (571)270-5898. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 7:30am-5:00pm EDT. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Eric Rosen, at (571) 270-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW M NELSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588968
DENTAL HANDPEICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12564481
PATIENT INDIVIDUAL PHYSICAL TRANSFER KEY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12551318
METHOD, SYSTEM AND MODEL FOR INDIRECT BONDING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12521216
CONNECTOR FOR A DENTAL VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12521209
METHODS OF SEPARATING OCCLUSAL SURFACES WITH REPOSITIONING JAW ELEMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 860 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month