Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/920,758

SHIFTING, RE-ORIENTING, ORGANIZING, AND/OR ROUTING OBJECTS INCLUDING PARCELS AND PACKAGES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 18, 2024
Examiner
BIDWELL, JAMES R
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
1394 granted / 1556 resolved
+37.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1582
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§102
41.9%
+1.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1556 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The first paragraph of the specification should be updated to show the parent application is now a patent. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 6, 10, 17 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Crandlemire (US 3,812,982) in view of Morioka (JP 62-74854). Crandlemire shows an object orienting mechanism having a pivot assembly 38, first pivoting extension 20, 22 coupled to the pivot assembly, a second pivot extension 44, 46 coupled to the pivot assembly, each pivot assembly has fingers, the first pivoting extension is moved into planar alignment with a surface 28 and the first and second pivoting assemblies are operable to rotate so the fingers lift and move an abject into a second orientation. Not shown is a shifting mechanism which feed the fingers. However, shown by Morioka is such a shifting mechanism 14 which feeds rotating fingers which change the orientation of an object. To include a shifting mechanism on Crandlemire would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention as it would provide an automatic feed and removal of objects which would speed production. Re claim 6, shown by Morioka is the use of belts and rollers for the shifting mechanism. Re claim 10, the first and second pivoting extensions rotate about a common axis so as to move the fingers. Re claim 17, the pivoting extensions are moved into planar alignment with a receiving surface so as to lift and re-orientate an object. Re claim 20, the fingers 20, 22 and 44, 46 are rotatable into a common plane in an alternating sequence. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5, 7-9, 11-16, 18 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES R BIDWELL whose telephone number is (571)272-6910. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8 to 4. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford, can be reached at telephone number (571)272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the USPTO patent electronic filing system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via a variety of formats. See MPEP § 713.01. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/InterviewPractice. /JAMES R BIDWELL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3651 03/18/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600518
CONTAINER TRANSPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSPORTING CONTAINERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595121
Container Transport Facility
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589948
APPARATUS FOR HANDLING PREFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583685
OPERATOR PLATFORM UNITS FOR USE WITH CONVEYORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577066
System and Method for Mounting Fixtures on an Independent Cart
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.3%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1556 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month